On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Person, Roderick wrote:
> > It claims that /dev/psaux is not a
>> directory (which I agree with :) ). Sorry I didn't mention it
>>
> [Person, Roderick]
> This sound like the you need to make the device, although I have to
>say I never had this proble
> It claims that /dev/psaux is not a
> directory (which I agree with :) ). Sorry I didn't mention it
>
[Person, Roderick]
This sound like the you need to make the device, although I have to
say I never had this problem, with a mouse of having to make the device. I'
On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Person, Roderick wrote:
>I have to say that using the gpm autodetect never worked for me.
>
>Just type in the mouse type and info yourself Just use /dev/psaux for the
>mouse type.
I did that, actually, with no luck. It claims that /dev/psaux is not a
directory (which I agre
Original Message-
> From: Michael Stenner [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 1999 10:11 AM
> To: Debian User Mailing List
> Subject: silly mouse question
>
> At least I hope it's silly
>
> Installing 2.1_r0 and I have a PS/2 mouse (says so on th
At least I hope it's silly
Installing 2.1_r0 and I have a PS/2 mouse (says so on the mouse) plugged
onto the PS/2 port on the box. Problem is, neither gpm nor X seem to be
happy with it (i.e. see it at all)
gpm's "autodetect" promptly rules out ALL possibilities claiming they
have a different "r
5 matches
Mail list logo
