gpg randomly losing keys [was: Re: signature and missing key]

2003-06-24 Thread Pigeon
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:58:49PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:15:09PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:32:14PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: > > | With a dialup, it would be rather useful to be able to do this from the MTA > > | rather than the MUA. >

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-23 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:15:09PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:32:14PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: > | With a dialup, it would be rather useful to be able to do this from the MTA > | rather than the MUA. > > True. > > | Unfortunately /usr/share/doc/exim/spec.txt.gz c

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-18 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:32:14PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: | With a dialup, it would be rather useful to be able to do this from the MTA | rather than the MUA. True. | Unfortunately /usr/share/doc/exim/spec.txt.gz contains no references | to either gpg or pgp. Am I really out of luck for built-in |

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-17 Thread Pigeon
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:51:53PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:09:21AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: > > thank you for the answer!. Do I need to import the public key for > > *each* user? I am asking because many user of this list use this type > > of signature! >

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-17 Thread Jeremy Brooks
Is there a way to get this information via http or shttp? It appears that I am behind a firewall which blocks the command listed above. On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 06:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:57:22AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: > > Hello, > > > > when r

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-17 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:09:21AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: > thank you for the answer!. Do I need to import the public key for > *each* user? I am asking because many user of this list use this type > of signature! Yes, you do. gpg can be configured to do this automatically ('keyserver

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-17 Thread Marcelo Chiapparini
Hi! thank you for the answer!. Do I need to import the public key for *each* user? I am asking because many user of this list use this type of signature! or importing the Linux Kernel Archives key do the task for all users? Thanks again Marcelo On 17.06.03 10:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi!

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-17 Thread eamon-roque
Hi! On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:57:22AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: > Hello, > > when reading some emails with Balsa, I get the following message: > > "The signature could not be verified due to a missing key" > You need to import the public key from the respective user. The Linux Kernel

signature and missing key

2003-06-17 Thread Marcelo Chiapparini
Hello, when reading some emails with Balsa, I get the following message: "The signature could not be verified due to a missing key" what does it mean and how can I fix it? TIA! Marcelo -- Marcelo Chiapparini DFT-IF/UERJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s