Re: Xfree 4.1 Sig 11 (woody)

2002-01-03 Thread Christoph Simon
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:25:46 -0800 (PST) "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Just guessing: Maybe a hardware error? Maybe something related to > > java threads? > > i suppose its possible its a hardware error..(hope not!!) > i don't think i had anything java related running. i was > using

Re: Xfree 4.1 Sig 11 (woody)

2002-01-03 Thread nate
> > Just guessing: Maybe a hardware error? Maybe something related to > java threads? i suppose its possible its a hardware error..(hope not!!) i don't think i had anything java related running. i was using a www-based program called DEMARC(demarc.org) its fully server-side though ..i was doing s

Re: Xfree 4.1 Sig 11 (woody)

2002-01-03 Thread dman
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 06:24:56PM -0200, Christoph Simon wrote: | On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:04:53 -0800 (PST) | "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | > this is odd. its NEVER happened before. i was doing | > normal stuff in X and all of a sudden X crashed. ... | | > Fatal server error: | > Caught si

Re: Xfree 4.1 Sig 11 (woody)

2002-01-03 Thread Christoph Simon
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:04:53 -0800 (PST) "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this is odd. its NEVER happened before. i was doing > normal stuff in X and all of a sudden X crashed. I > make extensive use of X and usually 15-30 virtual desktops > every day and have never had a problem. i last upgrade

Xfree 4.1 Sig 11 (woody)

2002-01-03 Thread nate
this is odd. its NEVER happened before. i was doing normal stuff in X and all of a sudden X crashed. I make extensive use of X and usually 15-30 virtual desktops every day and have never had a problem. i last upgraded my woody dist about 3 weeks ago. my X was not heavily loaded at the time(i usual

Re: sig 11

2001-09-25 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 14:40:33 +0200, Bas van Gils wrote: > I have a sig-11 problem. Now, I know that this usually means: broken RAM. That the most common cause. There are however many other potential causes; see http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11 for the list. HTH, Ray -- Obsig: developing a

sig 11

2001-09-25 Thread Bas van Gils
Hi everyone, I have a sig-11 problem. Now, I know that this usually means: broken RAM. However, I don't think that's the problem with me. Recently, my PC started showing `strange behavior'. So, I went to the computerstore (those of you familiar with it: Com4 in Tilburg, The Nethe

Re: Sig 11 in X4.02 using Matrox G450

2001-02-10 Thread Damon Muller
Quoth Damon Muller, > Quoth Frederik Vanrenterghem, > > This is a link to the Matrox linux users forum. In this forum, you'll find > > many questions regarding the G450 and X4.02. Essentially, it seems to boil > > down to this: sorry, it doesn't work very well yet, wait for a driver > > update. >

Re: Sig 11 in X4.02 using Matrox G450

2001-02-09 Thread Damon Muller
Quoth Frederik Vanrenterghem, > This is a link to the Matrox linux users forum. In this forum, you'll find > many questions regarding the G450 and X4.02. Essentially, it seems to boil > down to this: sorry, it doesn't work very well yet, wait for a driver > update. > > If you do find a way to get

Re: Sig 11 in X4.02 using Matrox G450

2001-02-09 Thread Ramin Motakef
Damon Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi gang, > > After having bought a spanking-new Matrox G540 video card, I'm not able > to get it to use drm/dri for accelerated 3d. This is mildly annoying, as > I went and bought myself an expensive video-card so I could see the cool > OpenGL XScreensav

Re: Sig 11 in X4.02 using Matrox G450

2001-02-08 Thread Frederik Vanrenterghem
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Damon Muller wrote: > > BTW, this is using the mga_drv.o module from the Matrox site (the > standard X4 one does not work with the G450). > http://forum.matrox.com/cgi-bin/mgaforum/forumdisplay.cgi? action=topics&forum=Linux&number=2&DaysPrune=30&LastLogin= This is a link t

Sig 11 in X4.02 using Matrox G450

2001-02-08 Thread Damon Muller
Hi gang, After having bought a spanking-new Matrox G540 video card, I'm not able to get it to use drm/dri for accelerated 3d. This is mildly annoying, as I went and bought myself an expensive video-card so I could see the cool OpenGL XScreensaver hacks! I'm using X4.02 from testing (as of tonight

Re: sig 11 problem when compiling kernel???

1997-10-29 Thread liiwi
>> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >> (regarding hardware problems indicated by failed kernel compiles): >> >> > You can also change the bios setings, adding more wait states or so. >> >> This is a good idea. I forgot to mention that I already >> did that. Hi! Also you *may*

Re: sig 11 problem when compiling kernel???

1997-10-28 Thread Frank Sergeant
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (regarding hardware problems indicated by failed kernel compiles): > You can also change the bios setings, adding more wait states or so. This is a good idea. I forgot to mention that I already did that. -- Frank -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS M

Re: sig 11 problem when compiling kernel???

1997-10-28 Thread Frank Sergeant
Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (ragarding hardware problems indicated by failed kernel compiles): > because you are using K6, make sure that it is made after week 30. K6 > before week 30 will trigger a bug where people cannot compile Linux > kernel if there are more than 32MB in their comput

kernel messages [WAS: Sig 11 problems...]

1997-10-27 Thread Thalia L. Hooker
Hi, I was just noticed in my log files that I have these messages in my /var/adm/kern.log: attempt to access beyond end of device 03:02: rw=0, want 707406379, limit 1433376 This message is repeated several times and ultimately the computer locks up. Does someone have an idea what is causing these

Re: sig 11 problem when compiling kernel???

1997-10-27 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Oct 26, 1997 at 02:36:12PM -0600, Frank Sergeant wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thalia L. Hooker) wrote > > > Anyways, my next step was to 'make zImage'. I kept getting Sig 11 errors > > though not at the same point of compilation: > > gcc: Internal com

Re: sig 11 problem when compiling kernel???

1997-10-26 Thread Lawrence
: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thalia L. Hooker) wrote > > > Anyways, my next step was to 'make zImage'. I kept getting Sig 11 errors > > though not at the same point of compilation: > > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 > ... >

Re: sig 11 problem when compiling kernel???

1997-10-26 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
ge LaTeX compile, again at random places in the > compile. > > I am inclined to believe that the sig 11 and the segmentation > faults are indeed symptoms of bad hardware. Last May, I spent > several days swapping RAM SIMMs around, hoping to get a good > set that would cure th

Re: sig 11 problem when compiling kernel???

1997-10-26 Thread Frank Sergeant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thalia L. Hooker) wrote > Anyways, my next step was to 'make zImage'. I kept getting Sig 11 errors > though not at the same point of compilation: > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 ... > After reading the FAQ, it seemed

Re: sig 11 problem when compiling kernel???

1997-10-24 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Fri, Oct 24, 1997 at 02:14:56PM -0500, Thalia L. Hooker wrote: Hi! For kernel compiling, try using the kernel-package deb file. It is a lot of easier with it, and you avoid common mistakes. For your seg11 problem, try pulling the RAM out and put it in again. Follow the suggestions in the FAQ

sig 11 problem when compiling kernel???

1997-10-24 Thread Thalia L. Hooker
debian web site for the past two days, and haven't been able to do so; connections either time out or I get an empty document. I don't know the exact path of the mailing list archives, which is what I was trying to access. Anyways, my next step was to 'make zImage'. I kept gett