Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-25 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 14:19, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 14:04 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > I used to use nvu. But looks like it has been removed from Debian. I do > > not want to edit any text files. So vim, emacs etc., are not what I am > > looking for. While edi

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-25 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/25/07 11:41, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > On Thursday 25 January 2007 01:12, Marc Shapiro wrote: >> Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > said: >>> Sorry wrong wording on my part. When I said "it should

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-25 Thread Kelly Clowers
On 1/25/07, Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 25 January 2007 01:12, Marc Shapiro wrote: > Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > said: > > Sorry wrong wording on my part. When I said "it should look exactly > > as it would appear

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-25 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
On Thursday 25 January 2007 01:12, Marc Shapiro wrote: > Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > said: > > Sorry wrong wording on my part. When I said "it should look exactly > > as it would appear on the net", I meant the editor to have a WYSIWYG > > way o

Απ: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-25 Thread Nick Demou
2007/1/25, David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wednesday 24 January 2007 19:04, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML > stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex [...] Try Amaya. It comes from w

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-25 Thread David Goodenough
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 19:04, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML > stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS > capabilities are necessary. > > I used to use nvu. But looks like it has been r

Re: Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-24 Thread Marc Shapiro
Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > said: Sorry wrong wording on my part. When I said "it should look exactly as it would appear on the net", I meant the editor to have a WYSIWYG way of editing html pages. HTML editing should be as easy as writing a

Re: texmacs (Re: shopping for an HTML editor)

2007-01-24 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:24:04PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > I used to think vim + latex-suite is the ideal way to edit a complex LaTeX > document. But then I tried texmacs and just love it. Now, all my documents > are in .tm format instead of .tex. If you are a heavy LaTeX user, I s

texmacs (Re: shopping for an HTML editor)

2007-01-24 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 21:39, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > Personally, opening up an HTML document in vi and hacking away at it is > much easier than using a WYSIWYG editor. But then, I think that writing > a LaTeX document in vi is much easier than editing a document in word or > abiword

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-24 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:39:49PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > Sorry wrong wording on my part. When I said "it should look exactly as it > would appear on the net", I meant the editor to have a WYSIWYG way of editing > html pages. > > HTML editing should be as easy as writing a texmac

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-24 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 15:36, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > I used to use nvu. But looks like it has been removed from Debian. I do > > not want to edit any text files. So vim, emacs etc., are not what I am > > looking for

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-24 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 14:03, Glenn Becker wrote: > > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic > > HTML stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no > > complex CSS capabilities are necessary. > > Bluefish or Quanta are nice editors, or there's

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-24 Thread Paul Johnson
Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML > stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex > CSS capabilities are necessary. Amaya sounds like it's what you're looking for. It produces real HTML, as in, someth

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-24 Thread Nyizsnyik Ferenc
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 15:22 -0500, celejar wrote: > On 1/24/07, Glenn Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML > > > stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex > > > CSS > > > capabilities ar

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-24 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > I used to use nvu. But looks like it has been removed from Debian. I do not > want to edit any text files. So vim, emacs etc., are not what I am looking > for. While editing the page, it should look exactly as it would appe

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-24 Thread Glenn Becker
Bluefish does WYSIWYG ? I thought it is "merely" an HTML editor. you are correct, my inner filter made me leap right over WYSIWYG. sorry. gb +-+ Glenn Becker - [EMAIL PROTECTED] SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org +-

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-24 Thread celejar
On 1/24/07, Glenn Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML > stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS > capabilities are necessary. Bluefish or Quanta are nice editors, or there's html-helpe

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-24 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 14:04 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > I used to use nvu. But looks like it has been removed from Debian. I do not > want to edit any text files. So vim, emacs etc., are not what I am looking > for. While editing the page, it should look exactly as it would appear on the

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-24 Thread Greg Folkert
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 14:04 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML > stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS > capabilities are necessary. > > I used to use nvu. But looks like it has been

Re: shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-24 Thread Glenn Becker
Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS capabilities are necessary. Bluefish or Quanta are nice editors, or there's html-helper-mode in Emacs. If you like real basic, there's one cal

shopping for an HTML editor

2007-01-24 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS capabilities are necessary. I used to use nvu. But looks like it has been removed from Debian. I do not want to edit any text files. So vim, ema