On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 02:22:35PM +0900, John Crawley wrote:
> On 06/02/2019 03.17, ghe wrote:
> > On 2/5/19 9:19 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > > Have you tried replacing "-" with \45 yet? That's the ascii equivalent
> > > for "-'.
> >
> > Excellent idea. But:
> >
> > root@sbox:~# systemctl unma
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 02:04:54AM -0800, Rusi Mody wrote:
> I seem to be missing something...
> Is -.mount literally a thing?
> Or -- more likely -- are shell's arcane quoting/interpolating rules garbling
> something quite into a "-" unit?
Perhaps you're better off looking into the systemd
co
I seem to be missing something...
Is -.mount literally a thing?
Or -- more likely -- are shell's arcane quoting/interpolating rules garbling
something quite into a "-" unit?
On 06/02/2019 03.17, ghe wrote:
On 2/5/19 9:19 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Have you tried replacing "-" with \45 yet? That's the ascii equivalent
for "-'.
Excellent idea. But:
root@sbox:~# systemctl unmask \45.mount
Unit 45.mount does not exist, proceeding anyway.
(Same with quotes.)
You mi
On 2/5/19 2:05 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> I still think that that massive effort might have been better spent
>> fixing init. Handling threads, tightening some methods and regulations,
>> tidying up init.d and its buds, [...]
>
> Start here: https://jdebp.eu/FGA/system-5-rc-problems.html
Yup. T
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 02:00:12PM -0700, ghe wrote:
> I still think that that massive effort might have been better spent
> fixing init. Handling threads, tightening some methods and regulations,
> tidying up init.d and its buds, [...]
Start here: https://jdebp.eu/FGA/system-5-rc-problems.html
On 2/5/19 12:01 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>>From man systemctl:
>
>mask NAME...
>Mask one or more units, as specified on the command line. This will
>link these unit files to /dev/null, making it impossible to start
>them. This is a stronger version of d
sts.debian.org
> Subject: Re: shell script problem
> Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 18:18:34 + (UTC)
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> On 2/5/19 9:19 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
> > Have you tried replacing "-" with \45 yet? That's the ascii
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:51:42AM -0700, ghe wrote:
> I'd still like to know what 'mask' means in systemd.
>From man systemctl:
mask NAME...
Mask one or more units, as specified on the command line. This will
link these unit files to /dev/null, making it impossible t
On 2/5/19 9:12 AM, john doe wrote:
> What message
Never mind. It quit complaining. No changes to the scripts. Maybe a
systemd update -- there are several updates to lots of code with testing.
Thanks for the responses.
> In general, ignoring error messages is a recipe for disaster.
You'd think s
On 2/5/2019 7:17 PM, ghe wrote:
> On 2/5/19 9:19 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
>> Have you tried replacing "-" with \45 yet? That's the ascii equivalent
>> for "-'.
>
> Excellent idea. But:
>
> root@sbox:~# systemctl unmask \45.mount
> Unit 45.mount does not exist, proceeding anyway.
>
> (Same with q
On 2/5/19 9:19 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Have you tried replacing "-" with \45 yet? That's the ascii equivalent
> for "-'.
Excellent idea. But:
root@sbox:~# systemctl unmask \45.mount
Unit 45.mount does not exist, proceeding anyway.
(Same with quotes.)
--
Glenn English
On 2/5/2019 4:43 PM, ghe wrote:
> Buster
>
> A shell script has begun to throw errors I can't seem to get rid of.
> Didn't used to -- it started in the past few days.
>
> I have access to a couple Internet connections: a slow but extremely
> reliable T1 I've been with for years, and a Comcast resid
Buster
A shell script has begun to throw errors I can't seem to get rid of.
Didn't used to -- it started in the past few days.
I have access to a couple Internet connections: a slow but extremely
reliable T1 I've been with for years, and a Comcast residential cable
WiFi that's odd, but very fast.
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 07:14:03PM +0200, Jörg Johannes wrote:
| > Hm.
| >
| > If
| > ./col2row.sh
| > gives "Keine Berechtigung", but this one works:
| > sh ./col2row.sh
| >
| > then you most likely put the script on a filesystem that has been
| > mounted with the "noexec" attribute. Som
> Hm.
>
> If
> ./col2row.sh
> gives "Keine Berechtigung", but this one works:
> sh ./col2row.sh
>
> then you most likely put the script on a filesystem that has been
> mounted with the "noexec" attribute. Sometimes people mount /tmp this
> way. Another test of this would be to copy /bin/l
16 matches
Mail list logo
