Ok, looks like I had to create the qdisc first before I can create a filter.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Podrigal, Aron
wrote:
> After looking a bit more, it looks to me that this is what was happening
> (correct me if I'm wrong). looks like those filter types are now statically
> linked in
After looking a bit more, it looks to me that this is what was happening
(correct me if I'm wrong). looks like those filter types are now statically
linked into tc. But if the parameters given to tc could not be understood
using any statically linked algorithms, tc tries to dynamically load other
I am trying to do traffic shaping using tc, however I can't add any filters
and am getting this generic error message
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
We have an error talking to the kernel
A simple strace shows that the problem is that it can't find the required
filter type libraries in /us
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:21:28PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Joel Roth [2014-11-12 10:08 -1000]:
>
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> >
> >
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:40:55PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2014-11-12 22:03 +0100, Joel Roth wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:35:34PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> On 2014-11-12 21:08 +0100, Joel Roth wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'm running sid. For the first time in many months, I'm
> >>
* Joel Roth [2014-11-12 10:08 -1000]:
>
> Hi list,
>
>
>
> I'm running sid. For the first time in many months, I'm
> trying to build
On 2014-11-12 22:03 +0100, Joel Roth wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:35:34PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2014-11-12 21:08 +0100, Joel Roth wrote:
>>
>> > I'm running sid. For the first time in many months, I'm
>> > trying to build a package from source. After compiling I'm
>> > getting l
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:35:34PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2014-11-12 21:08 +0100, Joel Roth wrote:
>
> > I'm running sid. For the first time in many months, I'm
> > trying to build a package from source. After compiling I'm
> > getting library-not-found errors, for example:
> >
> > apt-g
On 2014-11-12 21:08 +0100, Joel Roth wrote:
> I'm running sid. For the first time in many months, I'm
> trying to build a package from source. After compiling I'm
> getting library-not-found errors, for example:
>
> apt-get source ntfs-3g
>
> debuild -b -uc -us
>
> Which eventually triggers a lib
Hi list,
I'm running sid. For the first time in many months, I'm
trying to build a package from source. After compiling I'm
getting lib
quot;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu" to
> the PATH but got the same error message.
>
> Any ideas? Thanks
>
>
>
> $ ./reflash
> ./reflash: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> $ ls -l
- Original Message -
>> I'm beginning to suspect "reflash" is a 32-bit program. Could
> this be the reason? Thanks
>
> I guess you're right.
>
> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=730884
Yes, it is a 32-bit app, "# aptitude install lib32ncurses5 libgtk2.0-0
ia32-libs-g
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 19:51 -0700, T Elcor wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: Ralf Mardorf
> >
> > # ldconfig
>
> # ldconfig -v | grep -i libgtk-x11-2
> ldconfig: Path `/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' given more than once
> ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' given more than once
>
- Original Message -
> From: Ralf Mardorf
>
> # ldconfig
# ldconfig -v | grep -i libgtk-x11-2
ldconfig: Path `/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' given more than once
ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' given more than once
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 -> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10
I'm beginn
# ldconfig
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1350614002.1112.131.camel@localhost.localdomain
hanks
$ ./reflash
./reflash: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
$ ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Aug 6 12:30
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 -> lib
On Monday 14 February 2011 09:56:55 Glyn Astill wrote:
> "lvm: error whilst loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open
> shared object file: no such file or directory"
Sounds like something got way too aggressive when removing packages. Can you
get into the system env
Hi Guys,
I've just had an attempt at upgrading a machine from lenny to squeeze, however
this machine as an lvm root volume.
Upon booting I now see the message:
"lvm: error whilst loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open shared
object file: no such file or directory"
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:18 AM, David Fox wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Aniruddha wrote:
>> I try to install a 32-bit program in 64-bit Debian but I get the
>> following message: 'error while loading shared libraries:
>
> Have you installed the 32-b
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Aniruddha wrote:
> I try to install a 32-bit program in 64-bit Debian but I get the
> following message: 'error while loading shared libraries:
Have you installed the 32-bit compatibility libraries?
Anytime you manually install a library (and really,
I try to install a 32-bit program in 64-bit Debian but I get the
following message: 'error while loading shared libraries:
libopenal.so.0'. To fix this I downloaded
libopenal1_1.4.272-2_i386.deb and extracted 'libopenal.so.1' and
'libopenal.so.1.4.272 'to /usr/
Hi Andrzej,
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 03:34 +0200, Andrzej wrote:
> I just installed Lenny 64 and have problem with UPS software. There is no
> debs, but script for so called other distros. I run it and seems to be ok. But
> when I tried to run it i receive errror: "upsm: error while
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:34, Andrzej wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed Lenny 64 and have problem with UPS software. There is no
> debs, but script for so called other distros. I run it and seems to be ok. But
> when I tried to run it i receive errror: "upsm: error
On 2009-04-28 03:34 +0200, Andrzej wrote:
> I just installed Lenny 64 and have problem with UPS software. There is no
> debs, but script for so called other distros. I run it and seems to be ok. But
> when I tried to run it i receive errror: "upsm: error while loading shared
> l
Hi,
I just installed Lenny 64 and have problem with UPS software. There is no
debs, but script for so called other distros. I run it and seems to be ok. But
when I tried to run it i receive errror: "upsm: error while loading shared
libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object fil
ad
> http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-libraries.html,
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html and some
> other articles however I don't understand: Why packages in
> testing/unstable require the newer shared libraries ?
>
> Thanks,
> Boris
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 13:00, Boris Toloknov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eugene,
> Thank you for the answers. Now it's more clear to me. I wish every package
> was in backports or at least packages which can be put there easily because
> typical home user ( including me ) doesn't want to wait for
Eugene,
Thank you for the answers. Now it's more clear to me. I wish every
package was in backports or at least packages which can be put there
easily because typical home user ( including me ) doesn't want to wait
for the next release or to compile everything.
Boris
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote
packages in testing/unstable
> require the newer shared libraries ?
Packages in testing or unstable require newer shared libraries because they are
newer. Not much point in releasing a new version of Debian without new versions
of programs. *It is brand new and improved! It just happens to have exactly
Boris Toloknov wrote:
> Will my system be broken after upgrading libc6* along with locales,
> tzdata and binutils from testing(lenny) repository ?
It probably won't. Lenny is in freeze for several months now.
> If not then it
> means that other programs ( for example bash ) are able to work with
>
Hi All,
I have debian stable (etch). Sometimes I want to install the newest
versions of some packages from testing/unstable. Typically I can only
install some package with the newer version of the shared libraries it
depends on. For example dash (0.5.3-7) from etch depends on libc6
<h
On 07/04/2008, Haines Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Joost Witteveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> > ldd /usr/bin/gmfsk
> >>
> >>
> >> $ ldd /usr/bin/gmfsk | grep libstdc
> >> libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb738e000)
> >>
> >> So, since I had libstsdc++.s
"Joost Witteveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > ldd /usr/bin/gmfsk
>>
>>
>> $ ldd /usr/bin/gmfsk | grep libstdc
>> libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb738e000)
>>
>> So, since I had libstsdc++.so.6 installed, and this is what it needs,
>> why would installation of libstdc
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 06:48:37AM -0400, Haines Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
>> "Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Where did you get that copy of gmfsk from?
>>
>> A couple years ago I had to compile it from source, but I n
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 06:48:37AM -0400, Haines Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> "Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Where did you get that copy of gmfsk from?
>
> A couple years ago I had to compile it from source, but I now see that
> it is a deb package. The package is wh
> > ldd /usr/bin/gmfsk
>
>
> $ ldd /usr/bin/gmfsk | grep libstdc
> libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb738e000)
>
> So, since I had libstsdc++.so.6 installed, and this is what it needs,
> why would installation of libstdc++.so.5 enabled it to work?
If it were to happen to me
fine. But when I go to run it, I get, as either root or user:
>>
>> gmfsk: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
>> open shared object file: No such file or directory
>>
>> The application uses libstdc++6 >= 4.1.0, but the error sugges
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The application uses libstdc++6 >= 4.1.0, but the error suggests it is
>> turning instead to libstdc++.so.5.
>
> What is the application you are talking about? How are you sure it uses only
> libstdc++6? Is libstdc++6 installed on your machine?
On 04/06/2008 08:45 PM, Haines Brown wrote:
This a common error message, but a search on line didn't resolve it.
I'm running debian etch. I installed an application, gmfsk, deb, which
went fine. But when I go to run it, I get, as either root or user:
gmfsk: error while load
Haines Brown wrote:
> This a common error message, but a search on line didn't resolve it.
>
> I'm running debian etch. I installed an application, gmfsk, deb, which
> went fine. But when I go to run it, I get, as either root or user:
>
> gmfsk: error while loadi
This a common error message, but a search on line didn't resolve it.
I'm running debian etch. I installed an application, gmfsk, deb, which
went fine. But when I go to run it, I get, as either root or user:
gmfsk: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
o
"- Tong -" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: mplayer
> Version: 1:1.0-rc1svn20070225-0.3
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
Hi,
> I have always been using mplayer from debian-multimedia repo. But
> today when I use mplayer, I get:
>
> $ mplayer
>
Please do not top post.
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:11:26 +0300, bUg. wrote:
>> $ mplayer
>> mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libGL.so.1: cannot open
>> shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> please give your xorg.conf.
not relevant.
>
while loading shared libraries: libGL.so.1: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
$ apt-cache policy mplayer
mplayer:
Installed: 1:1.0-rc1svn20070225-0.3
Candidate: 1:1.0-rc1svn20070225-0.3
Version table:
*** 1:1.0-rc1svn20070225-0.3 0
600 http://debian
gt; mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libGL.so.1: cannot open
> shared object file: No such file or directory
>
...
>
> I think it is mplayer's packaging problem. To overcome it, what is
> the name of OpenGL(?) package should I install?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-
Package: mplayer
Version: 1:1.0-rc1svn20070225-0.3
Severity: normal
Hi,
I have always been using mplayer from debian-multimedia repo. But
today when I use mplayer, I get:
$ mplayer
mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libGL.so.1: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:02:25AM +0200, Krzysztof Luba??ski wrote:
From: Krzysztof Luba??ski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian-user list
Subject: Re: linphone: error while loading shared libraries:
libosipparser2.so.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:02:25AM +0200, Krzysztof Luba??ski wrote:
From: Krzysztof Luba??ski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian-user list
Subject: Re: linphone: error while loading shared libraries:
libosipparser2.so.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 23:45 +0200, Gerard Robin wrote:
> I had reinstalled libosip2-3 but the result was the same.
> I just downgrad to libosip2-3 (2.2.2-3.1) instead libosip2-3 (3.0.3-2)
> and now linphone starts witout complain,
I have downloaded both versions of the package and the contents
(
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 11:08:36PM +0200, Krzysztof Luba??ski wrote:
From: Krzysztof Luba??ski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian-user list
Subject: Re: linphone: error while loading shared libraries:
libosipparser2.so.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 19:49 +0200, Gerard Robin wrote:
> >Do you have the relevant library package installed
>
> if it's libosip2-3, yes.
>
> ldd /usr/bin/linphone | grep libosipparser2.so.3
> libosipparser2.so.3 => not found
> libosipparser2.so.3 => not found
>
> apt-cache pol
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:07:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Luba??ski wrote:
From: Krzysztof Luba??ski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian-user list
Subject: Re: linphone: error while loading shared libraries:
libosipparser2.so.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 15:29 +0200, Gerard Robin wrote:
> linphone: error while loading shared libraries:
> libosipparser2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> bug or not bug ?
Hello.
Do you have the relevant library package installed?
http://package
Hello,
with sid (amd64) linphone worked fine and now I get:
linphone: error while loading shared libraries:
libosipparser2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
bug or not bug ?
Thanks
--
Gérard
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 07:09:31PM +0200, Gilles Sadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> > One thing you could try would be something like this as root:
> >
> > strace -o /tmp/ls.strace -f su - "Broken" -c ls
> >
> > and then send ls.strace here.
> >
>
> # strace -o ls.strace -f su
Hi.
[Sorry for starting a new thread (I deleted the wrong copy of the mail).]
>
> It would be interesting to see an strace of, e.g., ls trying to run
> as a broken user. You might have to get a statically linked strace
> to do this, though :-(.
>
> One thing you could try would be somethin
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:15:07PM +0200, Gilles Sadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> > (I suspect it's more likely an environment
> > variable -- the packaging system shouldn't mess with permissions on these
> > directores -- but it would be nice to rule out any weirdness like that)
>
ot 4712 Jun 9 22:50 /lib
drwxr-xr-x 193 root root 71448 Jun 14 19:27 /usr/lib
"Broken" user:
$ ls -dl /lib /usr/lib
ls: error while loading shared libraries: librt.so.1: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
[All basic utilities exhibit the problem...]
> What about
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:20:15AM +0200, Gilles Sadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> > that its for shure an acces denied, try creating a new user and do the same
> > and chek
> > if the problem persist, if it does, then this might be a bug.
>
> I created a new user account and this
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> How come that the search path is different for different user?
Is LD_LIBRARY_PATH set? Other possibilities would be any of the LD_*
variables. What does this show? If you find any variables, unset
them, find where they are set and remove them. Does that fix things?
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:20:15 +0200
Gilles Sadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > $ ldd $(which ls)
> > > /bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open
> > > shared object file: No such file or directory
> >
> >
> > $ ldd $(which ls)
> > /bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open
> > shared object file: No such file or directory
> > /bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries: libdl.so.2: cannot open
> > shared object file: No
> >
> >After upgrading, I have the following problem when trying to execute some
> >programs, e.g. "ls":
> >
> >$ ls
> >ls: error while loading shared libraries: librt.so.1: cannot open shared
> >object file: No such file or directory
> >
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7de4000)
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f77000)
> libattr.so.1 => /lib/libattr.so.1 (0xb7de0000)
> libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb7ddb000)
> libsepol.so.1 => /lib/libsepol.so.1 (0xb7d9b000)
>
>
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7dfb000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7de4000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f77000)
libattr.so.1 => /lib/libattr.so.1 (0xb7de)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb7ddb000)
libsepol.so.1 => /lib/l
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
After upgrading, I have the following problem when trying to execute some
programs, e.g. "ls":
$ ls
ls: error while loading shared libraries: librt.so.1: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
[Same problem with many other program
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:25:08 +0200
Gilles Sadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > After upgrading, I have the following problem when trying to execute some
> > > programs, e.g. "ls":
> > >
> > > $ ls
> > > ls
> >
> > After upgrading, I have the following problem when trying to execute some
> > programs, e.g. "ls":
> >
> > $ ls
> > ls: error while loading shared libraries: librt.so.1: cannot open shared
> > object file: No such file or directory
>
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:54:51 +0200
Gilles Sadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> After upgrading, I have the following problem when trying to execute some
> programs, e.g. "ls":
>
> $ ls
> ls: error while loading shared libraries: librt.so.1: cann
Hello.
After upgrading, I have the following problem when trying to execute some
programs, e.g. "ls":
$ ls
ls: error while loading shared libraries: librt.so.1: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
[Same problem with many other programs ("locate", &qu
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:00:33PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > not an expert on this but, on the mad64 machine I have
>^
> mad? :)))
yeah well allowed to be mad some times 8)
>
> Regards,
> Andrei
> --
> If yo
Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> not an expert on this but, on the mad64 machine I have
^
mad? :)))
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 07:26:02PM -0700, stevem wrote:
> On Friday 11 May 2007, Joe Hart wrote:
> > While the 64-bit processors can run 32 bit code, the way it works, AFAIK
> > will not allow one to mix 32 bit code and 64 bit code in the same
> > userspace. That is why 32 bit libraries don't work
On Friday 11 May 2007, Joe Hart wrote:
> While the 64-bit processors can run 32 bit code, the way it works, AFAIK
> will not allow one to mix 32 bit code and 64 bit code in the same
> userspace. That is why 32 bit libraries don't work. They work fine if
> the program that is calling them is 32 bi
How does one get this less-powerful, but cooler-sounding, 54 bit processor?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 08:54:48AM +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> SteveM wrote:
> > All the machines on my network mount /usr/local/lib/... using NFS. This
> > has
> > worked well for me until I added 64 bit boxen. 64bit perl chokes on 32bit
> > c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SteveM wrote:
> All the machines on my network mount /usr/local/lib/... using NFS. This has
> worked well for me until I added 64 bit boxen. 64bit perl chokes on 32bit
> compiled libraries.
>
> I feel there must be a simple solution. How have oth
All the machines on my network mount /usr/local/lib/... using NFS. This has
worked well for me until I added 64 bit boxen. 64bit perl chokes on 32bit
compiled libraries.
I feel there must be a simple solution. How have others solved this problem?
thx,
stevem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Hi,
Setting up kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 (2.4.27-10sarge1) ...
/bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries: libdl.so.2: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
Failed to create initrd image.
dpkg: error processing kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 (--configure):
subprocess post
(2.0.10) ...
Setting up kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 (2.4.27-10sarge1) ...
/bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries: libdl.so.2: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
Failed to create initrd image.
dpkg: error processing kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 (--configure):
subprocess
Anton Piatek wrote:
> Hi,
> I had some hardware die, and now having replaced it all I seem to have a
> corrupted system.
>
> % cp
> cp: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x24
>
> I have no idea why this is happening, and searching the
Yeah, everything except the disk was replaced, but it booted fine
afterwards... except without cp I cannot install much new...
Anton
Nicolas Pillot wrote:
> 2006/11/7, Anton Piatek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I had some hardware die, and now having replaced it
>> all I seem to have a corrupted sys
2006/11/7, Anton Piatek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I had some hardware die, and now having replaced it
all I seem to have a corrupted system.
Did you replace the motherboard ? I have already replaced everything
other than the mb itself (ram,cpu & co included), my debian was still
fine.
A friend did
Hi,
I had some hardware die, and now having replaced it all I seem to have a
corrupted system.
% cp
cp: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x24
I have no idea why this is happening, and searching the internet has
revealed nothing similar (maybe I am being too
ChadDavis wrote:
> I see that there's some application specific subdirectories in those
> shared library locations. Should I make a subdirectory, such as
> /usr/lib/oracleInstnatClient/, and put the shared objects in there?
> And then just dump the executables into /usr/bin?
For your own sanity,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ChadDavis wrote:
> Oracle gives just gives you a zip with some executables and shared
> libraries in it. I guess they figure you know where to put them.
>
> I see that there's some application specific subdirectories in those
Oracle gives just gives you a zip with some executables and shared
libraries in it. I guess they figure you know where to put them.
I see that there's some application specific subdirectories in those
shared library locations. Should I make a subdirectory, such as
/usr/lib/oracleInstnatC
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:32:00PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> ChadDavis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm installing an application, oracle's instant client actually,
> > and I need to know where to put the shared libaries ( .so ). I'm
> > pretty unfamiliar with development on Unix/Linux so I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ChadDavis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm installing an application, oracle's instant client actually,
> and I need to know where to put the shared libaries ( .so ). I'm
> pretty unfamiliar with development on Unix/Linux so I don't
> exactly know how things
Hello,
I'm installing an application, oracle's instant client actually, and I
need to know where to put the shared libaries ( .so ). I'm pretty
unfamiliar with development on Unix/Linux so I don't exactly know how
things work. I suppose there's some sort of path variable for
locating shared lib
Hi,
I am using Fedora Core 4 and I have the same problem...when opening xine
I get the same error. I was wondering if you have already solved the
problem and more important...HOW?? I did the trick cd /usr/lib
# ln -s libcrypto.so.0.9.7 libcrypto.so.4
# ln -s libssl.so.0.9.7 libssl.so.4, but it did
d probably make an ext2 floppy and include
> > major
> > binaries such as
> > - bash
> > - login
> > - mount
why those binaries ???
- you will need to know why and which binaries
to include
login is not needed ... since you're trying
t image
> But I don t know how to do
> I should probably make an ext2 floppy and include
> major
> binaries such as
> - bash
> - login
> - mount
> but I have also to include shared libraries .so
> and I think I can't only copy them from hdd to the
> floppy
>
hello
I am trying to make my own floppy root image
But I don t know how to do
I should probably make an ext2 floppy and include
major
binaries such as
- bash
- login
- mount
but I have also to include shared libraries .so
and I think I can't only copy them from hdd to the
floppy
I
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:13:07 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Please excuse the OTness of this post. Since I am writing a library
> to be included in Debian, I feel that I should not be slaughtered
> for bothering you and hoping for your time and knowledge.
>
It wouldn't be OT if y
Hi there,
Please excuse the OTness of this post. Since I am writing a library
to be included in Debian, I feel that I should not be slaughtered
for bothering you and hoping for your time and knowledge.
I have a question about shared libraries. Even though I did search
the web, I could not find a
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:03:23PM -0400, David Meiser wrote:
> Mark C wrote:
> >On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 20:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin/netscape-installer# ./netscape-installer
> >>./netscape-installer-bin: error while loading sha
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 03:32, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> Hi List
>
> Just upgraded my packages for Xwindows to unstable and downgraded them
> again. Gnome 1.4 started fine with Startx.
>
> Gnome 2.2 gives me:
>
> error while loading shared libraries: libXmuu.so.1:
> when I
Hi List
Just upgraded my packages for Xwindows to unstable and downgraded them
again. Gnome 1.4 started fine with Startx.
Gnome 2.2 gives me:
error while loading shared libraries: libXmuu.so.1:
when I do startx
~/.xsession-errors tells me:
xrdb: error while loading shared libraries
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 04:43:11PM -0700, Craig Maloney wrote:
> > my first thought was that the .2 was g++ 2.95, .2.3 was g++ 3.0, and
> > .2.3.1 was g++ 3.1.
>
> Look more carefully and you'll see that three of those are just symlinks
> to the fourth.
Doh!... my bad.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
