On Tue, 28 May 2013, Andreas Meile wrote:
> I tried that out on a lab system where I replaced pam_unix.so into
> pam_unix2.so inside both common-auth and common-password config
> files.
>
> Result: The system nows recognizes all $2a$ (Blowfish) password
> hashes but does not longer accepts $6$ (SH
Hello Recoverym4n
Thanks for your hint.
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: /etc/shadow password hash format (migration from SuSE 9.3 to
Debian Wheezy)
Install 'libpam-unix2' package. Configure PAM as outlined
in /usr/share/
On Mon, 27 May 2013 16:23:20 +0200
"Andreas Meile" wrote:
> A "apt-cache search blowfish" shows me a lot of Blowfish related packages.
> So is there one on it which extends the login authentication routine also to
> process Blowfish hashes in /etc/shadow or is that a much more complicate
> pro
On 05/27/2013 04:23 PM, Andreas Meile wrote:
> Hello Chris
>
> - Original Message - From: "Chris Davies"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 2:54 PM
> Subject: Re: /etc/shadow password hash format (migration from SuSE 9.3
> to Debian Wheezy)
>
>
&g
Hello Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Davies"
To:
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: /etc/shadow password hash format (migration from SuSE 9.3 to
Debian Wheezy)
man 3 crypt contains a NOTES section that identifies the ID and describes
Andreas Meile asked about /etc/shadow:
> Is there a good overview WWW link about all these
> $$[$] formats?
man shadow says of the encrypted password field, "Refer to crypt(3)
for details on how this string is interpreted."
man 3 crypt contains a NOTES section that identifies the ID and describe
Hello Debian users
I recently migrated an old SuSE Linux 9.3 box to Debian 7 Wheezy. There I
backuped the /etc/shadow file to import the existing passwords from my users
to the new Debian environment using a "vipw -s" command as part of the
migration.
Result: Classic UNIX hashes (format [0-9A-Za
A few month ago I had the same problem, and a lot of people here solved
all my doubts... there are the abstract of the 'Samba Passwords Amazing
History':
Situation:
1. Samba allows the use of PAM (aka shadow passwords if you
configure it) and authentification through smbpasswd.
I am trying to set up Samba to share a printer on my network. I am using Potato
2.2r2.
I can see the Linux computer from Win98 but cannot enter the required password.
I notice from /var/log/samba that there is a problem with no
/etc/samba/smbpasswd entry for user 'default'. There is no /etc/sa
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:33:17PM -0400, Chris Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:04:32PM -0400, Chris Gray wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 04:48:16PM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > > sorry, but i'm trying to write some tools for beowulf administration.
> > >
> > > consider the prog
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:04:32PM -0400, Chris Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 04:48:16PM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > sorry, but i'm trying to write some tools for beowulf administration.
> >
> > consider the program:
> > printf("Usage: encrypt salt password\n");
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 04:48:16PM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> sorry, but i'm trying to write some tools for beowulf administration.
>
> consider the program:
> printf("Usage: encrypt salt password\n");
> strncpy(password, crypt(argv[1], salt), 49);
argv[
sorry, but i'm trying to write some tools for beowulf administration.
consider the program:
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char password[50];
char salt[50];
if (argc != 3) {
On Sun, 26 Jul 1998, Cheng Dien Yiu Anthony wrote:
: When I installed hamm 2.0, at first, I choose to turn off shadow password
: system. Now I want to turn on the shadow password system. How do I do it?
Type 'shadowconfig on' as root.
-Remco
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscr
When I installed hamm 2.0, at first, I choose to turn off shadow password
system. Now I want to turn on the shadow password system. How do I do it?
Thanks
Anthony
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
I want to compile qpopper2.4 with the shadow passwords.
The INSTALL file explain that i have to define a AUTH variable in the
Makefile but at the compile there is a error, in pop_pass.c ,with
pw_encrypt
--
Julien Ortega -- EXTERN
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
what is the advantage comparing
to dis in shadowing password?
kusuma
There are shadow packages in project/experimental. We plan authentication
support (not just shadow) for 1.3 .
Thanks
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key.
PGP fingerprint = 88 6A 15 D0 65 D4 A3 A6 1F 89 6A 76 95 24 87 B3
--
I have just upgraded a system from 1.1 + shadow password packages
to 1.2. Unfortunately it converted my shadow system to a non
shadow system (BUG: it also left /etc/password readable by root
only).
I'm just wondering what is the current shadow support in
debian 1.2? And what are the plan
> > >
> > > root:x:0:root,"your loginname"
> > > ...
> > I don't like that. It seems unsafe to me. There's gotta be
> > a better solution
> >
> > Currently, I am putting in special users in /etc/suauth
> > but I only know the syntax for making su ask for the current
> > users passwd, and not ro
On Mon, 25 Nov 1996, Roger Endo wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Nov 1996, Fundamental wrote:
> >
> > > I recently intsalled the shadow password packages to my system, everything
> > > seems to be going well accept for one minor hassle, my "normal" account
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
r u in the "wheel" group?
/ayn
On Tue, 26 Nov 1996, Fundamental wrote:
> I recently intsalled the shadow password packages to my system, everything
> seems to be going well accept for one minor hassle, my "normal" account cant
> b
On Tue, 26 Nov 1996, Fundamental wrote:
> I recently intsalled the shadow password packages to my system, everything
> seems to be going well accept for one minor hassle, my "normal" account cant
> become super-user. When i try i get the message that i do not have
> permis
I recently intsalled the shadow password packages to my system, everything
seems to be going well accept for one minor hassle, my "normal" account cant
become super-user. When i try i get the message that i do not have
permission to do so. How do i get the permission?
thank
Has anyone "debianized" the shadow password suite?
| This is OFFICIAL *WRITTEN* notification that I want to be *REMOVED* |
| from *ALL* of your mailing lists. *EVERY* message sent from this |
| account has had this request posted. ALL UNSOLICITED ADVERTISEMENTS |
| SE
In reply to the honourable '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' who said:
> Im sick of solaris x86, we want to migrate or user machine from solaris x86
> to debian. The only problem is, i dont want to have to convert 500
> passwd/shadow entries into debian passwd entries.
>
> Can debian (a package perhaps?) hand
Enough packages have been built with "shadow" passwords so that you can
run them. They are available in the project/experimental directory on our
FTP archive. The encryption should be the same.
Thanks
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" t
*argh*
Im sick of solaris x86, we want to migrate or user machine from solaris x86
to debian. The only problem is, i dont want to have to convert 500
passwd/shadow entries into debian passwd entries.
Can debian (a package perhaps?) handle shadow? and is the solris encryption
the same as the debi
28 matches
Mail list logo
