* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030211 12:04]:
> also sprach Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.11.0624 +0100]:
> > from your hard drive to any or all recipients from your address book.
> > But it only happens about once a month or so, so it's okay. Just keep on
> > using it.
>
> huh
also sprach Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.11.0624 +0100]:
> from your hard drive to any or all recipients from your address book.
> But it only happens about once a month or so, so it's okay. Just keep on
> using it.
huh?
> AFAICT, mutt can't do this ... yet. Try dropping the attache
* Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030210 23:06]:
> Try dropping the attached patch in your debian/patches.
Woops. I mean, of course, the attached patch.
good times,
Vineet
diff -urN mutt-1.5.3.orig/pgp.c mutt-1.5.3/pgp.c
--- mutt-1.5.3.orig/pgp.c 2002-12-16 07:27:26.0 -0800
+++
from your hard drive to any or all recipients from your address book.
But it only happens about once a month or so, so it's okay. Just keep on
using it.
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030201 05:33]:
> When I sign a message with mutt and GPG, the GPG signature's MIME part
> is introduced li
also sprach Derrick 'dman' Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.02.0345 +0100]:
> No. The problem with outhouse is that it doesn't do what the MIME
> headers say. The band-aid is to not use MIME. Hence the
> pgp_create_traditional option. I prefer the longer-term solution of
> not using broken s
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:16:06PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
| Also, does the above possibly give more of a clue to Outlook Express
| readers, who receive GPG signed email in two attachments to an empty
| message?
No. The problem with outhouse is that it doesn't do what the MIME
headers say.
also sprach Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.01.1817 +0100]:
> There is an option or two in man muttrc that are along the lines
> 'set Outlook_compat' or something - I think that's what you're looking
> for. It changes the way that the message is signed so that some broken
> mailers can
This one time, at band camp, martin f krafft said:
> When I sign a message with mutt and GPG, the GPG signature's MIME part
> is introduced like so in the message source:
>
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> A friend using Ximian Evolution can sign his
When I sign a message with mutt and GPG, the GPG signature's MIME part
is introduced like so in the message source:
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
A friend using Ximian Evolution can sign his emails with the following
MIME header:
Content-Type: applicat
9 matches
Mail list logo
