Hi.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:32:25AM +0200, Stefan K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today i tried it, but it didn't work:
> on my nfs-test system I use the 2x1GB interfaces
> showmount -e
> and
> showmount -e
> shows me the exports
> so now i mount the nfs-share on a server with 10G Interfaces(bond
2): Device or
resource busy"
Did I something wrong?
best regards
Stefan
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juni 2018 um 09:07 Uhr
> Von: Reco
> An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: session trunking with NFS
>
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 08:57:25AM
Hi.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 08:09:48AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:07:28AM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > Personally I'd rather use conventional network bonding on NFS server,
> > and be done with it.
>
> Conventional network bonding doesn't speed up a single stream,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:07:28AM +0300, Reco wrote:
Personally I'd rather use conventional network bonding on NFS server,
and be done with it.
Conventional network bonding doesn't speed up a single stream, which is
why people have been looking for alternatives.
Mike Stone
Hi.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 08:57:25AM +0200, Stefan Krueger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> so far as I know Debian stretch is shipped with NFS-Version 4.2. The RFC[1]
> said NFSv4.1 has the capability for sessiontrunking to speed up the
> performance/throughput, so my question is how can I archiv
Hello,
so far as I know Debian stretch is shipped with NFS-Version 4.2. The RFC[1]
said NFSv4.1 has the capability for sessiontrunking to speed up the
performance/throughput, so my question is how can I archiv this? How to
configure the NFS-server and how to mount it on the client-side? There i
6 matches
Mail list logo
