Hello Jonathan,
On Monday, September 03, 2001 at 3:11:40 PM,
you wrote (at least in part):
> you can get kernel 2.4 support in potato (I use this on production
> workstations), but adding this to /etc/apt/sources.list:
> #kernel 2.4 stuff
> deb http://people.debian.org/~bunk/debian potato main
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 04:50:55PM +1000, Sam Varghese wrote:
:On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:24:30PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
:i've already got a server running potato with 2.2.17. I figured
:woody was stable enough to be used on a server by now.
You can still get bit hard by a stray typo, but I've
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 04:50:55PM +1000, Sam Varghese wrote:
> just a question of been there, done that, with potato. thought
> i could get a shot at configuring iptables, that's why i
> thought of 2.4.
Now you are clear why you are asking this. I agree woody seems satble
enough if one migraded a
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:24:30PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> General rule of Linux:
>
> Server, use older mature platform.
> Client, have fun with latest thing but expect some glitch.
>
> So you should install potato with Kernel 2.2.
i've already got a server running potato with 2.2.17. I fig
General rule of Linux:
Server, use older mature platform.
Client, have fun with latest thing but expect some glitch.
So you should install potato with Kernel 2.2.
I have woody box (SMP/woody) but my server is 486/DX2 50MHz 20MB
running Kernel 2.2 /Potato (here)
Mail server (exim) + DNS ser
i need to set up a server for my home lan and am
thinking of using woody - if the hardware at hand
is good enough - with a 2.4 series kernel.
the hardware i have is an amd 486/100 with a 408 mb hard drive
and 40 meg of ram. i would need to run a mail and web server
besides a caching only nameserve
6 matches
Mail list logo
