Re: sendmail or perl: which is the bad one..

2001-09-30 Thread Robert Waldner
>> >>Yup, perl is to old to understand character classes >> >> >> >>> sendmail is "8.11.3+8.12.0.Beta7-8". >How about: > 1) mkdir > 2) cd > 3) apt-get source sendmail/unstable > 4) cd sendmail* > 5) dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us > 6) dpkg --install ../*.deb <...

Re: sendmail or perl: which is the bad one..

2001-09-19 Thread Robert Waldner
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 01:56:40 +0200, Robert Waldner writes: >On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:04:40 EDT, Richard A Nelson writes: >>On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Robert Waldner wrote: >Yup, perl is to old to understand character classes >> >>> sendmail is "8.11.3+8.12.0.Beta7-8". >> >>I corrected that problem in a la

Re: sendmail or perl: which is the bad one..

2001-09-18 Thread Robert Waldner
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:04:40 EDT, Richard A Nelson writes: >On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Robert Waldner wrote: > >> Just wanted to do a minor tweak to my sendmail-config at home, whilst >> stumbling into: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/mail# sendmailconfig >> Configure sendmail with the existing /etc/mail/

sendmail or perl: which is the bad one..

2001-09-17 Thread Robert Waldner
Hi! Just wanted to do a minor tweak to my sendmail-config at home, whilst stumbling into: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/mail# sendmailconfig Configure sendmail with the existing /etc/mail/sendmail.mc? [Y] Updating sendmail environment ... Character class syntax [: :] is reserved for future extensions