On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 17:07, nate wrote:
> > If I'm running Debian testing, and if security updates aren't really
> > applicable to a testing/unstable system, then is there any point in
> > having
> >
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free deb
>
>
> no, since 's
[snip]
> for a short
> time debian did maintain a 'testing' security update site at
> security.debian.org (I think it started after the semi-recent SSH stuff
> that came out), but I don't know if they still are doing it(I would expect
> them to not be doing it).
That would explain my confusion a
> If I'm running Debian testing, and if security updates aren't really
> applicable to a testing/unstable system, then is there any point in
> having
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free deb
no, since 'stable' and 'testing' are different trees. for a short
tim
If I'm running Debian testing, and if security updates aren't really
applicable to a testing/unstable system, then is there any point in having
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
in
4 matches
Mail list logo
