On 2014-10-01, Curt wrote:
>
> Here's a howto about the RPi as a surveillance camera that seems decent
> (I've read that all French nuclear power plants have switched to RPi
> surveillance due to budget limitations*).
>
>:-)
>
> *maybe that's why those Greenpeace people parachute in so easily.
>
On 10/1/2014 10:57 AM, ken wrote:
> On 10/01/2014 09:08 AM Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 10/1/2014 8:19 AM, ken wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2014 03:49 AM Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 01/10/14 17:42, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 30 sep 14, 21:01:52, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 9/30/2014 7:11 PM, Andr
On 10/1/2014 10:55 AM, John Aten wrote:
>
> On Oct 1, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>
>> The RPi is a cheap toy, but that's about all it's good for. The ones I
>> evaluated are now in the landfill. There are much better ones out there
>> for very little more.
>
> Could you give some r
On 2014-10-01, ken wrote:
>
> As for Raspbian not really being Debian, if true, how would that be
> relevant to how well the RPi functions for this purpose?
>
Here's a howto about the RPi as a surveillance camera that seems decent
(I've read that all French nuclear power plants have switched to
On 10/01/2014 09:08 AM Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 10/1/2014 8:19 AM, ken wrote:
On 10/01/2014 03:49 AM Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 01/10/14 17:42, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 30 sep 14, 21:01:52, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 9/30/2014 7:11 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 27 sep 14, 05:23:29, ken wrot
On Oct 1, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
> The RPi is a cheap toy, but that's about all it's good for. The ones I
> evaluated are now in the landfill. There are much better ones out there
> for very little more.
Could you give some recommendations?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On 10/1/2014 8:19 AM, ken wrote:
> On 10/01/2014 03:49 AM Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 01/10/14 17:42, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>> On Ma, 30 sep 14, 21:01:52, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 9/30/2014 7:11 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 27 sep 14, 05:23:29, ken wrote:
>>
>> What other che
On 10/1/2014 8:19 AM, ken wrote:
> On 10/01/2014 03:49 AM Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 01/10/14 17:42, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>> On Ma, 30 sep 14, 21:01:52, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 9/30/2014 7:11 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 27 sep 14, 05:23:29, ken wrote:
>>
>> What other che
On 10/01/2014 03:49 AM Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 01/10/14 17:42, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 30 sep 14, 21:01:52, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 9/30/2014 7:11 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 27 sep 14, 05:23:29, ken wrote:
What other cheap devices devices were you referring to that
would better h
On 01/10/14 17:42, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 30 sep 14, 21:01:52, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 9/30/2014 7:11 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>> On Sb, 27 sep 14, 05:23:29, ken wrote:
What other cheap devices devices were you referring to that
would better handle the load?
>>>
>>> ht
On Ma, 30 sep 14, 21:01:52, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 9/30/2014 7:11 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Sb, 27 sep 14, 05:23:29, ken wrote:
> >>
> >> What other cheap devices devices were you referring to that would better
> >> handle the load?
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/RaspberryPi
>
> You've
On 9/30/2014 7:11 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 27 sep 14, 05:23:29, ken wrote:
>>
>> What other cheap devices devices were you referring to that would better
>> handle the load?
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/RaspberryPi
>
> Kind regards,
> Andrei
>
You've never actually tried a RPi with a c
On Sb, 27 sep 14, 05:23:29, ken wrote:
>
> What other cheap devices devices were you referring to that would better
> handle the load?
https://wiki.debian.org/RaspberryPi
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
ht
On 09/26/2014 04:17 AM Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Vi, 26 sep 14, 09:05:32, Paul Lewis wrote:
In this case I have a Trendnet IP camera which will write to an NFS
share. I was looking for a server device that would be quieter and
consume less power than a conventional machine that I might be able t
On 26/09/14 17:44, ken wrote:
> On 09/25/2014 11:03 PM Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 26/09/14 01:48, Rob Owens wrote:
>>> >- Original Message -
>>From: "Scott Ferguson"
>>
>>I've been using motion for a few years and highly recommend it.
>>Lightweight[*1], simple, and reli
On Vi, 26 sep 14, 09:05:32, Paul Lewis wrote:
>
> In this case I have a Trendnet IP camera which will write to an NFS
> share. I was looking for a server device that would be quieter and
> consume less power than a conventional machine that I might be able to
> run in a headless configuration.
On 26/09/14 08:28:02, ken wrote:
> From what I've read, some have set up such a system on a Raspberry
> Pi
>
> running a version of Debian called "Raspbian". An RPi can be had in
> the US for $30-40 and a camera which plugs into a dedicated port on
> the
> card for about $50 (though I haven'
On 09/25/2014 11:03 PM Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 26/09/14 01:48, Rob Owens wrote:
>- Original Message -
>>From: "Scott Ferguson"
>>
>>I've been using motion for a few years and highly recommend it.
>>Lightweight[*1], simple, and reliable.
>>
>>Minimal configuration required (snapshot mod
From what I've read, some have set up such a system on a Raspberry Pi
running a version of Debian called "Raspbian". An RPi can be had in
the US for $30-40 and a camera which plugs into a dedicated port on the
card for about $50 (though I haven't checked prices for months). The
Raspberry Pi
On 26/09/14 01:48, Rob Owens wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Scott Ferguson"
>>
>> I've been using motion for a few years and highly recommend it.
>> Lightweight[*1], simple, and reliable.
>>
>> Minimal configuration required (snapshot mode):- Point your camera
>> at the zone t
- Original Message -
> From: "Scott Ferguson"
>
> I've been using motion for a few years and highly recommend it.
> Lightweight[*1], simple, and reliable.
>
> Minimal configuration required (snapshot mode):-
> Point your camera at the zone to be monitored.
> Take a picture.
> Edit the pi
On 24/09/14 23:43, Rob Owens wrote:
> I need to set up a couple usb cameras to record video based on motion
> detection. I prefer ease of setup to a large feature set, since this
> is expected to be only temporary. I want to only record when there
> is motion, so I don't have hours of footage to
- Original Message -
> From: "Bob McGowan"
>
> On 9/24/14, 6:43 AM, "Rob Owens" wrote:
>
> >I need to set up a couple usb cameras to record video based on motion
> >detection. I prefer ease of setup to a large feature set, since this is
> >expected to be only temporary. I want to only
On 9/24/14, 6:43 AM, "Rob Owens" wrote:
>I need to set up a couple usb cameras to record video based on motion
>detection. I prefer ease of setup to a large feature set, since this is
>expected to be only temporary. I want to only record when there is
>motion, so I don't have hours of footage t
I need to set up a couple usb cameras to record video based on motion
detection. I prefer ease of setup to a large feature set, since this is
expected to be only temporary. I want to only record when there is motion, so
I don't have hours of footage to search through.
A quick search shows rec
So libraries aren't my problem. The MxEasy software is a security camera
management and DVR software.
It starts and runs just fine, except there is no video. It keeps a running
count of the frames/sec coming in, so I know it's seeing the video, but when I
open a window in front of it and bri
On Tuesday 10 May, 2011 08:43:19 Bob McGowan wrote:
> You want to use:
>
> $ ldd filename # or libfilename.so or /full/path/lib/libfilename.so
Begorrah! It worked. All libraries are installed, but still no video.
# ldd MxEasy
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fff753ff000)
libmxm.so
On 05/09/2011 05:19 AM, cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote:
> On Sunday 8 May, 2011 08:27:27 godo wrote:
>> it's happened sometimes that some package missing in testing or sid but
>> from my experience it will come in few days or week.
>>
>> If you are in hurry try with sid version and if there is not t
And the kicker is that libsdl1.2debian (no -all) which I have
installed, has these exact files with these exact names as well. So
I think the software is looking for the package name with -all, and
when it doesn't find it it fails. I overrode dependencies and
installed it anyway, but inexplic
On Sunday 8 May, 2011 08:27:27 godo wrote:
> it's happened sometimes that some package missing in testing or sid but
> from my experience it will come in few days or week.
>
> If you are in hurry try with sid version and if there is not to much
> dependencies I think it wont be a problem.
I've
I looked for libsdl1.2debian-all in Debian's packages and found it in
Squeeze and Sid, but not Testing. Technically this MxEasy package is
for Ubuntu, but I've never had a problem like this before.
I know there is a way to check an app to find out what libs it's
calling for, but I can't rememb
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 07:35:56AM -0700, cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote:
>
> I am trying to install Mobotix's MxEasy security camera software, but it's
> refusing for dependency:
>
[cut]
>
> I know there is a way to check an app to find out what libs it's cal
I am trying to install Mobotix's MxEasy security camera software, but it's
refusing for dependency:
# dpkg -i /home/bill/dl/MxEasy_1.3.2-ubuntu-10.10_amd64.deb
Selecting previously deselected package mxeasy.
(Readin
33 matches
Mail list logo