On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:56:40 +, Chris Davies wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> In brief, for:
>> - Server managing purposes (SSH)
>> - File transfers for system users with shell access (SFTP)
>> - Remote/external file transfers with no shell access (FTPS)
>
> Also file transfers for system users,
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:50:16 -0500, Robert Blair Mason Jr. wrote:
> Quick question for those of us running anonymous ftp: Is it possible to
> configure vsftpd to allow unencrypted anonymous sessions, but require
> encryption for all user sessions? I've looked at the configuration but
> all of the
Camaleón wrote:
> In brief, for:
> - Server managing purposes (SSH)
> - File transfers for system users with shell access (SFTP)
> - Remote/external file transfers with no shell access (FTPS)
Also file transfers for system users, without shell access (SFTP). There
is a surprising amount of flexib
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:20:26 -0500
shawn wilson wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2011 12:27 PM, wrote:
> >
> > Hello Jason,
> >
> > From: Jason Hsu
> > Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:56:32 -0600
> > > What is your favorite alternative and why? Implicit FTPS? SFTP? FTP
> over SSH? Or something else?
> >
>
From: shawn wilson
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:20:26 -0500
> Ok, my gut tells me that plain text protocols might be faster than encrypted
> ones. However, I have no data to back this up and have never noticed
> 'significant' differences between rsync and rsync+ssh. Do you have this
> benchmark o
On Mar 10, 2011 12:27 PM, wrote:
>
> Hello Jason,
>
> From: Jason Hsu
> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:56:32 -0600
> > What is your favorite alternative and why? Implicit FTPS? SFTP? FTP
over SSH? Or something else?
>
> Another possibility is to firewall your LAN and use an ftp
> with satisfac
Hello Jason,
From: Jason Hsu
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:56:32 -0600
> What is your favorite alternative and why? Implicit FTPS? SFTP? FTP over
> SSH? Or something else?
Another possibility is to firewall your LAN and use an ftp
with satisfactory features. You will find that plain FTP
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:56:32 -0600, Jason Hsu writes:
> I understand that regular FTP has inferior security due to the lack of
> encryption. So I'm looking for an alternative to use on my home
> server.
>
> What is your favorite alternative and why? Implicit FTPS? SFTP? FTP
> over SSH? Or something
my favorite alternative to ftp? YES! all, everything, anything. hell,
dropbox is better than ftp.
but, just fire up your ssh server and out of the box, you've got tons of
features - including file transfer.
here's another suggestion: don't, under any circumstances, ever use ftp. for
clients on no
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:56:32 -0600, Jason Hsu wrote:
> I understand that regular FTP has inferior security due to the lack of
> encryption. So I'm looking for an alternative to use on my home server.
An alternative to FTP can be SSH. But you can still secure your FTP
server by adding TLS (most
I understand that regular FTP has inferior security due to the lack of
encryption. So I'm looking for an alternative to use on my home server.
What is your favorite alternative and why? Implicit FTPS? SFTP? FTP over
SSH? Or something else?
--
Jason Hsu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Thanks! I think that is what I need...
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Rob VanFleet wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 12:17:40PM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 06:58:35AM -0500, Alexander Wallace wrote:
> > > Hello there, is there an alternative to regular ftp server? does it
> > >
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 12:17:40PM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 06:58:35AM -0500, Alexander Wallace wrote:
> > Hello there, is there an alternative to regular ftp server? does it
> > require special client? Any sugestions???
>
> Provided that you have ssh installed on bot
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 06:58:35AM -0500, Alexander Wallace wrote:
> Hello there, is there an alternative to regular ftp server? does it
> require special client? Any sugestions???
Provided that you have ssh installed on both sides, check out hsftp.
It's not _really_ ftp, but it gives you an ftp-l
Hello there, is there an alternative to regular ftp server? does it
require special client? Any sugestions???
Thanks!
Hi there.
Until recently, I was running wu-ftpd as my FTP daemon. But I don't
want to use it anymore for security reasons (it has a lot of security
holes, which are easily exploitable). So I'm looking for some other
secure FTP daemon. I tried bsd-ftpd, and proftpd, both were fine
Arcady Genkin wrote:
>
> Is sftp not available as a Debian package? Couldn't find it in
> dselect.
>
> In any case, what are you folks using as a replacement for unsecure
> FTP protocol? I need a solution that would also provide my Windows
> users a viable method to transfer files to my server.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 06:38:09PM -0500, Arcady Genkin wrote:
:Is sftp not available as a Debian package? Couldn't find it in
:dselect.
I don't see it for "stable" either, though it is showing up on my
"unstable" boxen.
You could get the source and recompile against you're installed
libraries.
locutus:/usr/src# apt-cache show sftp
Package: sftp
Priority: optional
Section: non-US
Installed-Size: 56
Maintainer: Gergely Madarasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.9.5-1
Depends: ssh, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libncurses5, libreadline4 (>= 4.1)
Filename: dists/woody/non-US/main/binary
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arcady Genkin wrote:
> > Is sftp not available as a Debian package? Couldn't find it in
> > dselect.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>dpkg -p sftp
> Package: sftp
> Priority: optional
> Section: non-US
> Filename: dists/woody/non-US/main/binary-i386/sftp_0.9.5-1.d
Arcady Genkin wrote:
> Is sftp not available as a Debian package? Couldn't find it in
> dselect.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>dpkg -p sftp
Package: sftp
Priority: optional
Section: non-US
Installed-Size: 56
Maintainer: Gergely Madarasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.9.5-1
Depends: ssh,
Is sftp not available as a Debian package? Couldn't find it in
dselect.
In any case, what are you folks using as a replacement for unsecure
FTP protocol? I need a solution that would also provide my Windows
users a viable method to transfer files to my server.
Now that I've wrapped POP3 and IMA
xport, that leaves Canada and
virtually everywhere else in the world free to develop crypto. the
RSA patent is now expired. so what i am wondering, is there now a
project somewhere (Canada, the Netherlands etc) to build a secure ftp
replacement that is more in line with how ftp works (no need for a
If you're working on a workstation with X, GFTP (the recent version) can use
sftp for
secure, guix ftp. Just make a connection with ssh to get the key, and then
select
the ssh protocol in GFTP.
brian moore wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 05:41:46PM -0700, Tal Danzig wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 05:41:46PM -0700, Tal Danzig wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2000 17:24:23 -0700, brian moore said:
>
> : On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 01:18:08PM -0700, Tal Danzig wrote:
> : > Hi all,
> : >
> : > If you have ssh2 installed there is sftp2.
> :
> : If you have openss
Hello,
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000 17:24:23 -0700, brian moore said:
: On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 01:18:08PM -0700, Tal Danzig wrote:
: > Hi all,
: >
: > If you have ssh2 installed there is sftp2.
:
: If you have openssh installed, there is 'sftp', even available as a deb
: of the same name.
:
Th
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 01:18:08PM -0700, Tal Danzig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If you have ssh2 installed there is sftp2.
If you have openssh installed, there is 'sftp', even available as a deb
of the same name.
--
Brian Moore | Of course vi is God's editor.
Sysadmin, C/P
Hi all,
If you have ssh2 installed there is sftp2.
Tal
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000 13:32:56 -0500, Herbert Ho said:
: i use scp and they're no extra software to install. you can get
: directory listings and everything. though you
: can't browse.
:
: *shrug*
:
:
: herbert
:
: On Mon, Sep
i use scp and they're no extra software to install. you can get
directory listings and everything. though you
can't browse.
*shrug*
herbert
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 01:44:28PM -0400, Brian Stults wrote:
> _ is to ncftp, as ssh is to telnet.
>
> Is there a secure method of ftp? I use ssh
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 01:44:28PM -0400, Brian Stults wrote:
> _ is to ncftp, as ssh is to telnet.
>
> Is there a secure method of ftp? I use ssh instead of telnet between my
> home and work computers, but figured that's not all that great if I use
> ftp just as much and it isn't as secure
_ is to ncftp, as ssh is to telnet.
Is there a secure method of ftp? I use ssh instead of telnet between my
home and work computers, but figured that's not all that great if I use
ftp just as much and it isn't as secure. I really like ncftp, though,
so I would hate to give it up. What w
31 matches
Mail list logo
