Re: apt-secure / apt-get update gpg signature invalid

After upgrading aptly to newest version (0.9.7), the error disappear. The only changes I noticed are the inclusion of the SHA512 sums in the files and the creation of the content-arch.gz Original Message Subject: apt-secure / apt-get update gpg signature invalid Local Time

apt-secure / apt-get update gpg signature invalid

Hello, After setting up a new apt repository with aptly, signing the repository and adding the public gpg key to the apt keyring, I encounter a failure during the `apt update` command: Err:3 http://#REPO_URL#/#NAME# #DISTRIBUTION# InRelease The following signatures were invalid: #KEY_ID# Hit:4

Re: how secure is secure apt?

On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 08:53:20PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > hello, > > i just wanted to poll the debian community on whether they think that > using secure apt to upgrade/install packages over coffee shop wifi is > any more or less secure than doing the same via a home

how secure is secure apt?

hello, i just wanted to poll the debian community on whether they think that using secure apt to upgrade/install packages over coffee shop wifi is any more or less secure than doing the same via a home connection over say roadrunner? as i see it, there is an increased chance of a middleman (at

Re: gpg keys, secure apt

On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 17:17 -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > It appears that you have debsig-verify installed. Unless you have some > reason to be wanting dpkg to check internal gpg signatures of packages, > which are not widely or consistently used in debian, you can remove it. > This has nothing to do

Re: gpg keys, secure apt

Glenn English wrote: > dpkg: error > processing /var/cache/apt/archives/anjuta-common_1.2.4a-2_all.deb > (--unpack): > Verification on > package /var/cache/apt/archives/anjuta-common_1.2.4a-2_all.deb failed! > Authenticating /var/cache/apt/archives/anjuta_1.2.4a-2_i386.deb ... > debsig: Origin Sig

gpg keys, secure apt

OK. I give up. My apt keys are all screwed up. I think. 'apt-get install anjuta anjuta-common' says: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Suggested packages: libgtk2.0-dev libgtkmm2.0-dev libgnome2-dev libgnomemm2.0-dev devhelp-books glade-2 glade-gnom

Re: [ANNOUNCE] using secure apt with the testing security archive

Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Joey, > > Because this is of interest to a very large portion of Debian's user base, > this posting might have been better posted on debian-user-announce. I know > that mail to that list should be minimal, but a proper announcement of this On http://lists.d

Re: [ANNOUNCE] using secure apt with the testing security archive

It works great ! Thanks! Joey Hess wrote: Jerome BENOIT wrote: wget http://secure-testing.debian.net/ziyi-2005-7.asc -O - | sudo apt-key add - I have just tried it, and I got a `404 Not found' : Have I missed something ? I forgot that secure-testing.debian.net is a round robin and som

Re: [ANNOUNCE] using secure apt with the testing security archive

Joe Smith wrote: > Because this is of interest to a very large portion of Debian's user base, > this posting might have been better posted on debian-user-announce. I know > that mail to that list should be minimal, but a proper announcement of > this to that group (to which ALL debian users real

Re: [ANNOUNCE] using secure apt with the testing security archive

Jerome BENOIT wrote: > >wget http://secure-testing.debian.net/ziyi-2005-7.asc -O - | sudo apt-key > >add - > > > > I have just tried it, and I got a `404 Not found' : > > Have I missed something ? I forgot that secure-testing.debian.net is a round robin and some of the mirrors do not have that

Re: [ANNOUNCE] using secure apt with the testing security archive

Joey Hess wrote: -- Debian Testing Security Annoucement November 1st, 2005 secure-testing-team@lists.alioth.debian.org Joey Hess http://secure-testing-master.debian.net/

Re: [ANNOUNCE] using secure apt with the testing security archive

Joey, Because this is of interest to a very large portion of Debian's user base, this posting might have been better posted on debian-user-announce. I know that mail to that list should be minimal, but a proper announcement of this to that group (to which ALL debian users really should be subs

[ANNOUNCE] using secure apt with the testing security archive

-- Debian Testing Security Annoucement November 1st, 2005 secure-testing-team@lists.alioth.debian.org Joey Hess http://secure-testing-master.debian.net/ -

Re: secure apt

On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:48:25AM +1000, David Pastern wrote: > On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 13:19 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Hi Eric, > > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 07:16:08AM -0500, Eric wrote: > > > I recently upgraded testing and receive the new apt (version 0.6.41). > > > I have not been

Re: secure apt

On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 13:19 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 07:16:08AM -0500, Eric wrote: > > I recently upgraded testing and receive the new apt (version 0.6.41). > > I have not been able to get it to stop nagging. > > > "apt-key add /usr/share/apt/debian-arc

Re: secure apt

Hi Eric, On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 07:16:08AM -0500, Eric wrote: > I recently upgraded testing and receive the new apt (version 0.6.41). > I have not been able to get it to stop nagging. > "apt-key add /usr/share/apt/debian-archive.gpg" > but that returns > "gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found >