Re: Changing default search engine systemwide

2022-01-29 Thread didier gaumet
Le samedi 29 janvier 2022 à 20:30:05 UTC+1, pk a écrit : > Hello didier, > > Does the policies.json mechanism you are referring to allow users to > customize the search engine back to Google? > > Thanks Sorry, I'm no admin and don't use these policies, so I don't know

Re: Changing default search engine systemwide

2022-01-29 Thread pk
Hello didier, Does the policies.json mechanism you are referring to allow users to customize the search engine back to Google? Thanks

Re: Changing default search engine systemwide

2022-01-29 Thread didier gaumet
Hello, A possible way to do what you want seems to be described here: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/customizing-firefox-using-policiesjson and here (look at "SearchEngines -> Default"): https://github.com/mozilla/policy-templates/blob/master/README.md

Changing default search engine systemwide

2022-01-29 Thread pk
I want to set DuckDuckGo as the default search engine for new users, and allow each user to switch back to Google, if desired. But .mozilla/firefox/.default-esr/prefs.js hard-codes browser.urlbar.placeholderName to Google, so setting it in /etc/firefox-esr/my_settings.js won't work. Th

Replacement for askSam / Treepad--combination of a database, search engine, tree control, and my choice of editor

2016-06-26 Thread rhkramer
In my ongoing quest to find a Linux program to replace the functionality of AskSam (essentially a free format database with good search capability) that I used to use on Windows, I've come across Treepad for Linux. It isn't perfect, but I'd like to descibe it briefly / partially and ask if anyo

Skype, Yahoo, ICQ, MSN Messenger search engine tip

2012-09-09 Thread search-im
search-im is a brand new, user contributed Skype, Yahoo, AIM, ICQ, MSN Messenger search engine community created to help messenger users connect with each other based on their profession, hobbies, and other interests(not their name). Please feel free to have a try and add yourself, your service

Re: How to change search engine in IceApe/SeaMonkey?

2010-09-15 Thread godo
I think the location bar search facility is handled by "keyword.URL" value in "about:config" section. Greetings, That was it. Thanks! -- Bye, Goran Dobosevic Hrvatski: www.dobosevic.com English: www.dobosevic.com/en/ Registered Linux User #503414 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-re

Re: How to change search engine in IceApe/SeaMonkey?

2010-09-15 Thread Camaleón
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:19:37 +0200, godo wrote: > I was changed google.com with ixquick.com and when i press "Search" > button everything works how it should; but if I type anything in url > field and hit "enter" or "go" button it open result with google.com. > > Same thing in IceApe and SeaMonke

How to change search engine in IceApe/SeaMonkey?

2010-09-15 Thread godo
Hi all, I was changed google.com with ixquick.com and when i press "Search" button everything works how it should; but if I type anything in url field and hit "enter" or "go" button it open result with google.com. Same thing in IceApe and SeaMonkey in Squeeze and Sid. Does anyone have a solut

Re: Search engine for documentation indexing?

2010-02-11 Thread John Magolske
* Ian Zimmerman [100210 22:53]: > Olly> But as others have said, recoll is probably a better choice for > Olly> a Xapian-based solution for a desktop situation anyway. > > Well, but I'm not running a typical desktop, at least not if by that is > meant a Gnome or KDE stacked system. The fact that

Re: Search engine for documentation indexing?

2010-02-11 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:23:06 -0800 Ian Zimmerman wrote: ... > Well, but I'm not running a typical desktop, at least not if by that is > meant a Gnome or KDE stacked system. The fact that recoll is bound to a > particular GUI is definitely a disadvantage. So no orphaning omega > please! :-) Re

Re: Search engine for documentation indexing?

2010-02-10 Thread Ian Zimmerman
Olly> Automatically uncompressing gzipped files for indexing isn't hard Olly> to do, but what can you link to for them in the search results? Olly> Of the four web browsers I just tried, only w3m showed the Olly> contents of file:///usr/share/doc/coreutils/README.gz rather than Olly> downloading i

Re: Search engine for documentation indexing?

2010-02-10 Thread Olly Betts
Ian Zimmerman writes: > 3. xapian-omega. This seems to be the one modern apps are migrating to, > I heard of the Gnus mail/newsreader acquiring a xapian based search > function. But, out of the box it cannot index gzipped files (and most > documents in /usr/share/doc other that HTML pages are gzi

Re: Search engine for documentation indexing?

2010-02-09 Thread Celejar
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:05:26 -0600 Michael Iatrou wrote: > When the date was Tuesday 09 of February 2010, Wayne > wrote: > > > Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > > I'd like to build an index of the documentation in /usr/share/doc, [...] > > > I can't be the only one looking for this, so what do other deb

Re: Search engine for documentation indexing?

2010-02-09 Thread Michael Iatrou
When the date was Tuesday 09 of February 2010, Wayne wrote: > Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > I'd like to build an index of the documentation in /usr/share/doc, [...] > > I can't be the only one looking for this, so what do other debianists > > do? > > I use recoll and dwww but rely on recoll more and

Re: Search engine for documentation indexing?

2010-02-09 Thread Wayne
Ian Zimmerman wrote: I'd like to build an index of the documentation in /usr/share/doc, but I am quite unhappy with the options I have tried so far: 1. dwww has a built in cgi for searching an index built by swish++. Unfortunately swish++ indexing seems to take forever (it's described as "lighti

Search engine for documentation indexing?

2010-02-08 Thread Ian Zimmerman
I'd like to build an index of the documentation in /usr/share/doc, but I am quite unhappy with the options I have tried so far: 1. dwww has a built in cgi for searching an index built by swish++. Unfortunately swish++ indexing seems to take forever (it's described as "lighting fast" on the upstre

Re: Package search engine pb ?

2003-12-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:43:30PM +0100, FB wrote: > the search engine at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_packages > seems not to be working from a long time. http://www.debian.org/News/2003/20031121 Some services, including packages.debian.org, have yet to be restored.

Re: Package search engine pb ?

2003-12-16 Thread Nunya
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:43:30PM +0100, FB wrote: > the search engine at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_packages > seems not to be working from a long time. > Is there any plan to make this search engine working back ? > Do we have to use an other search engine ? >

Package search engine pb ?

2003-12-16 Thread FB
the search engine at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_packages seems not to be working from a long time. Is there any plan to make this search engine working back ? Do we have to use an other search engine ? I have tried rpmseek.com which is presented as the new search engine. All the

HOWTO install a multilingual search engine

2003-02-10 Thread Emma Jane Hogbin
The HOWTO is finally written. It's very long (21K of HTML ... and there's not that much HTML). Here's the URL for those of you who are interested. I'd love to get some feedback on it. I know it still needs at least a little bit of cleaning up...but I've been working on it for over 2 hours (plus y

search engine

2002-03-14 Thread Johann Spies
I am trying to set up mnogosearch with php-front-end as a search engine for our ftp-site. I have used the template config file (ftpsearch) as indexer.conf. After running the indexer on the ftp-archive of more than 270G I tried out the searching. Everything seems to work fine except that I do

Re: Search engine on lists.debian.org broken?

2001-08-10 Thread ktb
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:06:12AM -0700, Herbert Pirke wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone had any problems searching the user mailing > archive recently? Since several days, I always get 0 > results whatever I enter as search string. > > Is it broken or am I just too stupid? Another one. I haven't us

Re: Search engine on lists.debian.org broken?

2001-08-10 Thread dman
s search string. | > | > Is it broken or am I just too stupid? | | You can use - | http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/Debian-Linux/199/0/ I don't like geocrawler's interface. I think google actually has the best search engine for this sort of thing. It's really too bad

Re: Search engine on lists.debian.org broken?

2001-08-10 Thread ktb
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:06:12AM -0700, Herbert Pirke wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone had any problems searching the user mailing > archive recently? Since several days, I always get 0 > results whatever I enter as search string. > > Is it broken or am I just too stupid? You can use - http://www.g

Re: Search engine on lists.debian.org broken?

2001-08-10 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On 10 Aug 2001 02:06:12 -0700, Herbert Pirke wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone had any problems searching the user mailing > archive recently? Since several days, I always get 0 > results whatever I enter as search string. > > Is it broken or am I just too stupid? > I've read on www.debianplanet.org

Re: Search engine on lists.debian.org broken?

2001-08-10 Thread Johnny Ernst Nielsen
I have had the same problem for an entire day a couple of days ago. I have not made any searches since then, and I have no access to proper try a search right this second. So I can not check to see if I stell have the problem. Best regards Johnny :o) >Hi, > >Has anyone had any problems searching

Search engine on lists.debian.org broken?

2001-08-10 Thread Herbert Pirke
Hi, Has anyone had any problems searching the user mailing archive recently? Since several days, I always get 0 results whatever I enter as search string. Is it broken or am I just too stupid? __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as l

Free libre internet search engine.

2001-02-18 Thread Roberto Diaz
ybe is not that bad while freedom be respected).. I would like to propose the following: (and maybe it exist already if so tell me please and sorry!). We need a free, libre, Internet Search Engine.. we should coordinate this from all the international LUG's.. this Internet search engine sh

Re: We need a _Freaking_ Search Engine! Was: We need a FAQ. Don't you think we need a FAQ?

2000-08-23 Thread Daniel E. Baumann
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, s. keeling wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 08:19:47PM -0600, montefin wrote: > > > [yada yada snip] > > > > When every other site worth a damn has a basic, simple, > > clear-up-the-obvious, Search Engine, http://www.debian.org/search > >

Re: We need a _Freaking_ Search Engine! Was: We need a FAQ. Don't you think we need a FAQ?

2000-08-23 Thread s. keeling
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 08:19:47PM -0600, montefin wrote: > [yada yada snip] > > When every other site worth a damn has a basic, simple, > clear-up-the-obvious, Search Engine, http://www.debian.org/search > complains it has not found a Search Engine worthy of itself. I don&

Re: We need a Search Engine! Was: We need a FAQ.

2000-08-23 Thread Will Trillich
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 08:35:20PM -0600, montefin wrote: [snip] > When every other site worth a damn has a basic, simple, > clear-up-the-obvious, Search Engine, http://www.debian.org/search > complains it has not found a Search Engine worthy of itself. [snip] > Put an even so-so Sear

Re: We need a Search Engine! Was: We need a FAQ.

2000-08-22 Thread Nate Amsden
d to adopt Debian for my firewall. > >> > >> Over SuSE. Over FreeBSD. Over OpenBSD. And, my God yes, over Red Hat! > >> > >> This list has proven to be The_Only_Source_Of_Good_Debian_Input. But, it > >> has an enormously high volume, which it needn't have. >

Re: We need a Search Engine! Was: We need a FAQ.

2000-08-22 Thread montefin
ecided to adopt Debian for my firewall. > > > > Over SuSE. Over FreeBSD. Over OpenBSD. And, my God yes, over Red Hat! > > > > This list has proven to be The_Only_Source_Of_Good_Debian_Input. But, it > > has an enormously high volume, which it needn't have. > >

Re: We need a Search Engine! Was: We need a FAQ.

2000-08-22 Thread John Griffiths
. >> >> Why? >> >> When every other site worth a damn has a basic, simple, >> clear-up-the-obvious, Search Engine, http://www.debian.org/search >> complains it has not found a Search Engine worthy of itself. >> >> Not found a Search Engine worthy o

Re: We need a Search Engine! Was: We need a FAQ.

2000-08-22 Thread Nate Amsden
y_Source_Of_Good_Debian_Input. But, it > has an enormously high volume, which it needn't have. > > Why? > > When every other site worth a damn has a basic, simple, > clear-up-the-obvious, Search Engine, http://www.debian.org/search > complains it has not found a Search

We need a Search Engine! Was: We need a FAQ.

2000-08-22 Thread montefin
other site worth a damn has a basic, simple, clear-up-the-obvious, Search Engine, http://www.debian.org/search complains it has not found a Search Engine worthy of itself. Not found a Search Engine worthy of itself!?!! With the Best-Of-The-Best developing for Debian? Give me a break! Even I could

Free Shares in a new Search Engine

2000-06-07 Thread RegisterNow65
Hi, A new search engine is about to be launched on the internet. It promises to promote your web site in more ways than any other search engine currently available. As part of our launch we are giving away shares in the company. Register on our mailing list by sending a blank e.mail to [EMAIL

Re: search engine for the Guide

2000-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
On Fri, 5 May 2000, w trillich wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > So far, from the personal replies to me, htdig is the best solution > > > > given > > > > that we stuff many anchors in the text so you could jump directly to the > > > > right paragraph. > > > > > >

Re: search engine for the Guide

2000-05-06 Thread w trillich
Stas Bekman wrote: > > > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > So far, from the personal replies to me, htdig is the best solution given > > > that we stuff many anchors in the text so you could jump directly to the > > > right paragraph. > > > > can't we have a filter script that yanks the source html and > >