Re: screen rocks (was Re: potato on 486)

2001-10-31 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Brian May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011014 01:03]: > > "Karsten" == Karsten M Self writes: > > Karsten> $ man screen $ screen -x > > Ok, Thanks. I looked up "man screen", but couldn't find anything. -x > seems to be what I was looking for. > > I am still not quite sure how you allow d

Re: screen rocks (was Re: potato on 486)

2001-10-14 Thread Brian May
> "Karsten" == Karsten M Self writes: Karsten> $ man screen $ screen -x Ok, Thanks. I looked up "man screen", but couldn't find anything. -x seems to be what I was looking for. I am still not quite sure how you allow different unix users access to the screen though (see ACL command

Re: screen rocks (was Re: potato on 486)

2001-10-12 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 06:00:12PM +1000, Brian May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > "Karsten" == Karsten M Self writes: > > Karsten> It's not the same thing as virtual terminals, though it's > Karsten> got certain similarities. The real bonus is > Karsten> detachability -- you can

Re: screen rocks (was Re: potato on 486)

2001-10-12 Thread Brian May
> "Karsten" == Karsten M Self writes: Karsten> It's not the same thing as virtual terminals, though it's Karsten> got certain similarities. The real bonus is Karsten> detachability -- you can launch a screen session, detach Karsten> from it, connect later (or from another loc

screen rocks (was Re: potato on 486)

2001-10-12 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 01:13:26AM -0400, dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Actually, that's linux kernel specific. Sun Solaris boxes sorely lack > that. (Hence applications like 'screen' that I have yet to try) screen rocks! It's not the same thing as virtual terminals, though it's got certai