Am 25.04.2024 schrieb David Mehler :
> Since changing systems to Debian 12.5 I can't send, though checking
> the password with a manual login to Dovecot works fine.
Sending mails is SMTP and therefore postfix on your machine.
It can use PAM for auth. Do you use PAM?
Hello,
I have a quick question. Can Debian, and/or it's
Postfix/Dovecot/MySQL/MariaDB packages support the argon2 password
hashing scheme? I had a previously-working e-mail setup on a *BSD
system, utilizing the argon2ID scheme with Dovecot, Postfix, and MySQL.
Since changing syste
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:22:10 -0800
Gary Roach wrote:
> On 02/15/2016 09:59 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:39:26 -0800 Gary Roach
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Ever since I switch to Stretch I have been having a problem with
> >> the color sche
On 02/15/2016 09:59 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:39:26 -0800 Gary Roach
wrote:
Ever since I switch to Stretch I have been having a problem with the
color scheme of various applications. I get a lot of black lettering
on a black background, white on white and dark blue on
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:39:26 -0800 Gary Roach
wrote:
> Ever since I switch to Stretch I have been having a problem with the
> color scheme of various applications. I get a lot of black lettering
> on a black background, white on white and dark blue on black
> background (imposs
Hi all;
Ever since I switch to Stretch I have been having a problem with the
color scheme of various applications. I get a lot of black lettering on
a black background, white on white and dark blue on black background
(impossible to read). I've tried to fiddle with the colors at th
Martin T wrote:
> for some reason, I do not see those partitions with gdisk:
> http://i.imgur.com/4BlDQx7.jpg On the other hand, I'm also using older
> version(0.8.5 vs 0.8.8) of gdisk than you.. Or is there some other
> reason?
No. If gdisk does not show any special boot partition then there is
t;bios_grub" or "EFI system" partitions
>> located inside the GPT scheme, i.e. inside the first ~16KiB of the
>> disk and it is not seen with gdisk? In addition, if this small area
>> after the last partition is also for alignment purposes, then where is
>>
Martin T wrote:
> I see. Thanks! Are those "bios_grub" or "EFI system" partitions
> located inside the GPT scheme, i.e. inside the first ~16KiB of the
> disk and it is not seen with gdisk? In addition, if this small area
> after the last partition is also for a
Sven,
I see. Thanks! Are those "bios_grub" or "EFI system" partitions
located inside the GPT scheme, i.e. inside the first ~16KiB of the
disk and it is not seen with gdisk? In addition, if this small area
after the last partition is also for alignment purposes, then where is
t
Martin T wrote:
> 2) Am I correct that boot loaders use their code on this area after
> the primary GPT and before the first partition?
No.
Bootloaders store their code in a special "bios_grub" partition (type
EF02) when using the CSM/BIOS boot mode or inside a EFI System
partion when using EFI
Hi,
DebianInstaller shows "FREE SPACE" before the first partition and
after the last partition if GPT scheme is used:
http://i.imgur.com/qjNrdAx.jpg While there is nothing wrong with that
as there is indeed some free space before the first partition and
after the last partition(http://i
Hello,
I'm running Wheezy and see that there is no support for BLF-CRYPT
scheme for storing passwords in dovecot.
I've found bcrypt package for sid, but that is not what we need.
Otoh, I wonder if it would be possible to get blowfish hashed passwords
in Dovecot by using libpam
Wally Lepore writes:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:38 AM, lee wrote:
>> Wally Lepore writes:
>>
>> Thank you for putting up your questions in such a well made way!
>
>
> I appreciate that. Takes me forever to reply to all posts because I
> need to make sure my questions are 'somewhat' clear. :-)
ed through this section therefore I do
not know what questions will arrive next. I don't want to mess this
up. I will be installing debian-squeeze to its own hard disk (sdb) in
a dual boot set-up.
The installer ask you, if you want to keep your Win-installation.
My partition scheme (that
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:43 AM, lee wrote:
> Wally Lepore writes:
>
>> In order to be sure that Debian installs successfully, I also have a
>> USB stick that has the required debian firmware files loaded in the
>> event the debian installer asks for it during set-up.
>
> I needed that once and f
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:42 AM, lee wrote:
> Wally Lepore writes:
>
>> I forgot to add this additional information. I am installing Debian
>> netinst file titled: debian-6.0.6-i386-netinst.iso (32 bit)
>
> Isn't it better to go 64bit and to use the life installer CD? It might
> make more sense
wever, it's been a long time that I used IDE
> disks, so I don't know for sure.
Ok thank you. Lisi kindly explained this in detail earlier in this thread.
>> My partition scheme (that I have not set-up yet and based somewhat on
>> the above link) will be as follows:
>>
one being /boot. This is not a
prerequisite for the booting scheme to work but a preference, like
having /var on a separate partition. GRUB will find its files whether
they are on / or /boot. But, as I implied above, it's of no great
consequence.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Lisi wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 October 2012 09:41:28 Brian wrote:
>> For the use you will put the OS to I'd stick to your plan.
>
> Sorry, Wally. I had obviously forgotten something you had said. My bad!
no problem :-) Thank you
wally
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
orking with file folders. Not an issue. Been
doing this for years. :)
Just not sure how the installer or partition manager knows where and
how to place files when I set up any given partition scheme such as:
example #1
/boot
/
/home
swap
example #2
/
swap
example #3
/boot
/
/user
/temp
Swap
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Brian wrote:
> You will want to be sure you are partitioning the correct drive. Usually
> it is easy to distinguish between them because the drive containing
> Windows will probably have an NTFS filesystem on it. You should also
> double-check what the drive design
On 10/10/2012 01:33 PM, Wally Lepore wrote:
On 10/10/2012 03:22 AM, Wally Lepore wrote:
Based on the above, can a directory/partition be named /usr/local ?
and /var/mail ? I thought a directory can have only one name (i.e.
/usr -or- /local -or- /var -or- /mail).
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2
On 10/10/2012 07:33 PM, Wally Lepore wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 03:22 AM, Wally Lepore wrote:
>>> Based on the above, can a directory/partition be named /usr/local ?
>>> and /var/mail ? I thought a directory can have only one name (i.e.
>>> /usr -or- /local -or- /var -or- /mail).
>
> On Wed, Oct
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Lisi wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 October 2012 23:41:40 Wally Lepore wrote:
>> An interesting side note: Both identical drives are 'Enhanced IDE'
>> drives (EIDE). However for some reason during the debian set-up, the
>> installer identified them as SCSI drives and label
On 10/10/2012 03:22 AM, Wally Lepore wrote:
>> Based on the above, can a directory/partition be named /usr/local ?
>> and /var/mail ? I thought a directory can have only one name (i.e.
>> /usr -or- /local -or- /var -or- /mail).
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Linux-Fan wrote:
> You can hav
Lisi writes:
> Wally, I really do think that you should just stop worrying and install. It
> doesn't matter if you make mistakes, you can just reinstall.
That's probably what he is trying to avoid. Having to re-install isn't
really fun; it's a waste of time and shouldn't be needed, so why
enc
Wally Lepore writes:
> space I have allocated to each partition? As you can see I have an 80
> gig drive (total) that I'm installing debian too. Should I leave some
> 'free space' in the event I want to add another directory in the
> future?
Sooner or later, you might add more disks and then you
Wally Lepore writes:
> I have 1 gig of DDR RAM. Thus your suggesting I make the swap 2 gigs?
> I do let my system hibernate. Also, if I set the swap to 2 gigs, then
> the Appendix section 'C3' says,
>
> On some 32-bit architectures (m68k and PowerPC), the maximum size of a
> swap partition is 2GB
Wally Lepore writes:
> In order to be sure that Debian installs successfully, I also have a
> USB stick that has the required debian firmware files loaded in the
> event the debian installer asks for it during set-up.
I needed that once and found I had to unpack these drivers on the
stick. With
Wally Lepore writes:
> I forgot to add this additional information. I am installing Debian
> netinst file titled: debian-6.0.6-i386-netinst.iso (32 bit)
Isn't it better to go 64bit and to use the life installer CD? It might
make more sense to go 64bit when you do programming. And I've seen
Int
;m at now) with no issues.
That should be ok. However, it's been a long time that I used IDE
disks, so I don't know for sure.
> My partition scheme (that I have not set-up yet and based somewhat on
> the above link) will be as follows:
>
> 1st Partition -- Boot Partition
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 09:41:28 Brian wrote:
> For the use you will put the OS to I'd stick to your plan.
Sorry, Wally. I had obviously forgotten something you had said. My bad!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Hi, Wally!
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 02:22:38 Wally Lepore wrote:
> Based on the above, can a directory/partition be named /usr/local ?
> and /var/mail ? I thought a directory can have only one name (i.e.
> /usr -or- /local -or- /var -or- /mail).
Directories usually have subdirectories.
ailable directories such as:
> dev, lib, opt, var, usr, sys --- etc. Please see the list of
> additional directories:
> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apcs02.html.en
>
> Question #3 please:
> I am not sure if I need to include 'any' of these additional
> directories
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 23:41:40 Wally Lepore wrote:
> An interesting side note: Both identical drives are 'Enhanced IDE'
> drives (EIDE). However for some reason during the debian set-up, the
> installer identified them as SCSI drives and labeled them as follows
>
> SCSI1 (0,0,0) (sda) -80.0 GB
me and my system?
I think having more swap is not a problem. The only problem occurs if
you are going to use this swap because you run out of ram. Then the
system will slow down a lot.
> Not to get 'over-partitioned' here but after reading the appendix
> section titled,
> C.3.
or IDE channels.
The kernel will balance swap usage between multiple swap partitions,
giving better performance. -end-
Not sure if this applies to me and my system?
Not to get 'over-partitioned' here but after reading the appendix
section titled,
C.3. Recommended Partitioning Scheme
http
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Wolf Halton wrote:
> Wally,
> looks like an ok partitioning scheme. Having /home on its own partition
> means you can keep its contents even if you change the linux installed.
> Personally, I don't use a /boot partition; I just use / and /home.
Hi
well.
Wolf
PS make sure you Reply All or your email goes off-list.
Wolf Halton
http://sourcefreedom.com
Apache developer:
wolfhal...@apache.org
On Oct 9, 2012 8:13 PM, "Wally Lepore" wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Wolf Halton wrote:
> > Wally,
> > looks like
Wally,
looks like an ok partitioning scheme. Having /home on its own partition
means you can keep its contents even if you change the linux installed.
Personally, I don't use a /boot partition; I just use / and /home.
Wolf Halton
http://sourcefreedom.com
Apache developer:
wolfhal...@apache.o
). Doing
> so, will allow me to view a menu at start-up asking which operating
> system I want to boot (Windows or Debian). This will be accomplished
> by changing the boot order in my BIOS to boot the 2nd hard disk (sdb).
> I already tested this procedure using two hard disks each with windo
previously
described, I successfully booted to the 2nd hard disk (sdb). This 2nd
hard disk (sdb) is set to 'slave' on the same 40 pin ribbon cable as
the 1st hard disk (sda).
My partition scheme (that I have not set-up yet and based somewhat on
the above link) will be as follows:
1st Par
On 28/07/12 00:30, Adrian Fita wrote:
>
> How does one configure a theme's color settings for gtk3? :S
Fixed. It turns out I was editing the wrong file.
gtk3 colors are defined in the gtk.css file of the theme. I just copied
the whole theme's gtk-3.0 directory contents into ~/.config/gtk-3.0 and
Hi. I'm trying to set the selected items background color for gtk3
themes, but it doesn't seem to work.
I put the following in ~/.config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini, but it doesn't
make any difference:
gtk-color-scheme = "selected_bg_color:#44;selected_fg_color:#00"
I
On 03/08/2012 04:37 PM, Stayvoid wrote:
The one which suits your needs :p
Could you point me to the guide that actually explains this?
Every guide I read says something like: "do foo because foo is the right way."
It doesn't make any sense.
You're the only one who knows what you need. When you
On Jo, 08 mar 12, 17:35:38, Stayvoid wrote:
> > You really, really should read
> > http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html first (this applies to all
> > your other questions as well).
> I read it some time ago.
Well, maybe you should read it again. I'm not kidding, I've read it
myself seve
> The one which suits your needs :p
Could you point me to the guide that actually explains this?
Every guide I read says something like: "do foo because foo is the right way."
It doesn't make any sense.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
> You really, really should read
> http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html first (this applies to all
> your other questions as well).
I read it some time ago.
Sorry for zillions of questions, but I really want to hear some
thoughts on these topics. The guide is outdated and I hope it'll hel
On Jo, 08 mar 12, 16:49:15, Stayvoid wrote:
>
> What partition scheme is the best for a VPS (MTA + web server)?
The one which suits your needs :p
(SCNR)
You really, really should read
http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html first (this applies to all
your other questions as well).
Hello.
What partition scheme is the best for a VPS (MTA + web server)?
According to the guide [1] I should use something like this:
/home
/tmp
/var/tmp/
/var
/opt
/var/mail
[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch3.en.html
Cheers
P.S. Sorry for those who already seen
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:25:41 +0200, Arno Schuring
wrote:
>
> I stand corrected. Then your sector alignment should be a multiple of
> 8. I didn't know newer disks were all advanced format, even the smaller
> models.
>
I don't know, if all are. I just upgraded my laptop to 750 GB hard drive.
yudi v (yudi@gmail.com on 2011-10-18 00:09 +1000):
> > But the drive in question was 600GB (iirc). Too large for an SSD and
> > too small for advanced format...
> >
> It's an Advance format, check the fdisk output posted above.
I stand corrected. Then your sector alignment should be a multiple
Am Montag, 17. Oktober 2011 schrieb Arno Schuring:
> Virgo Pärna (virgo.pa...@mail.ee on 2011-10-17 08:50 +):
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:16:02 +0200, Arno Schuring
> >
> > wrote:
> > > yudi v (yudi@gmail.com on 2011-10-16 15:20 +1000):
> > >> Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boun
> Or alternatively, install wicd. It seems to be far less temperamental.
> Thanks.
>
I will need to install the network tool from the ISO image I got, I should
be able to mount it and install software from there, right?
I remember doing exactly the same with Fedora once.
Certainly, you are correct :)
> As general advice, 8 sectors is better because of advanced format. But
> then you also have to account for modern SSDs, which have erase block
> sizes between 128 and 512kB (256 or 1024 sectors), and for partitioning
> hw-raid devices you need to know the stripe siz
On Monday 17 October 2011 14:46:55 Ralf Jung wrote:
> As for network-manager, just install it with apt - alongside with the gnome
> applet or the KDE plasma widget or whatever frontend you plan to use.
Or alternatively, install wicd. It seems to be far less temperamental.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Virgo Pärna (virgo.pa...@mail.ee on 2011-10-17 08:50 +):
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:16:02 +0200, Arno Schuring
> wrote:
> > yudi v (yudi@gmail.com on 2011-10-16 15:20 +1000):
> >> Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries
> > This is not necessary. Menu X, D will allow you to chan
Hi,
> I unwittingly went for the bare bones install as last time I installed lot
> of junk checking quite a few options, now some of the essential tools I am
> used to are missing, I cannot connect to the internet as network manager is
> not installed, is there any other way I can connect to mobi
Installed Debian i386, will leave 64bit for the next time.
Once again, at boot and shut down, the order in which it looks for LVM
volumes is incorrect.
At boot time,
it looks for LVM volumes before opening up the LUKS container.
and at shut down, the order is in reverse.
I unwittingly went for th
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 22:16 +1000, yudi v wrote:
> > By default Squeeze installs grub2
> >
> > Cool, I always get confused with GRUB and GNOME.
>
> Is it worth trying amd64 install. I tried this long ago and wasted lot of
> time trying to get it working. Whats the current status?
Yes, it works fi
> By default Squeeze installs grub2
>
> Cool, I always get confused with GRUB and GNOME.
Is it worth trying amd64 install. I tried this long ago and wasted lot of
time trying to get it working. Whats the current status?
On 17/10/11 22:16, yudi v wrote:
>
>
>
> Also Sqeeze only installs GRUB legacy by default
By default Squeeze installs grub2
> --
> Kind regards,
> Yudi
>
$ dpkg --get-selections | grep grub
grub-common install
grub-pc
>
> > Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries
> This is not necessary. Menu X, D will allow you to change this to 1.
> The 2048 value is just wasteful (an overly safe default). Whether you
> care about losing that 2MB is your call...
>
True I can start at 8, not a big deal.
>
> > To
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:16:02 +0200, Arno Schuring
wrote:
> yudi v (yudi@gmail.com on 2011-10-16 15:20 +1000):
>> Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries
> This is not necessary. Menu X, D will allow you to change this to 1.
> The 2048 value is just wasteful (an overly safe defaul
yudi v (yudi@gmail.com on 2011-10-16 15:20 +1000):
> Could someone using GPT on a BIOS system confirm if I got the GPT
> partitioning right on a BIOS system
>
[..]
> Partition table scan:
> MBR: protective
> BSD: not present
> APM: not present
> GPT: present
>
> Found valid GPT with p
Could someone using GPT on a BIOS system confirm if I got the GPT
partitioning right on a BIOS system
I followed the documentation from http://www.rodsbooks.com/gdisk/
This is the out put after partitioning the HDD using Ubuntu 11.10 live CD
root@ubuntu:/home/ubuntu# gdisk /dev/sda
GPT fdisk (gd
>Le 26/09/2010 21:02, Celejar wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:29:28 +0200
>> Aniruddha wrote:
>>
>> Here's my opinion:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> * I think encryption is not well suited for a desktop system, unless
>> you have some special need for it (e.g. laptop). It creates extra
>> overhead, meaning it
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:29:28 +0200
Aniruddha wrote:
> Here's my opinion:
...
> * I think encryption is not well suited for a desktop system, unless
> you have some special need for it (e.g. laptop). It creates extra
> overhead, meaning it is a lot slower then a normal file system + it
> makes d
B) [encrypted, RAID1]
> /var (20 GB) [encrypted, RAID1]
> /tmp (500 MB) [encrypted, RAID1]
> /usr (rest of space) [encrypted, RAID1]
> swap (4 GB) [encrypted] (I have 4 GB of RAM)
>
> My mirrored 500GB with contain the following,
> /home (500GB) [encrypted, RAID1]
>
&
thermore I prefer a simple partion scheme: mine is:
/dev/sda1 swap 1 GB
/dev/sda2 / 100 GB
/dev/sda3 /home 889 GB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.de
ction, so these are my "constraints" while I planned the scheme.
Any comments on whether I'll regret doing the following would be
appreciated since I'm led to believe that the encryption phase of big
disks can take a very long time if you do it properly (so I'd rather
minim
ample a section won't
> grow beyond its limits (inhibiting other pieces of the system to
> operate correctly), and also some speed reasons are argued as well,
> :)...
>
> Well, The following scheme is proposed (from what I read btoh from
> openBsd
example a section won't
> grow beyond its limits (inhibiting other pieces of the system to
> operate correctly), and also some speed reasons are argued as well,
> :)...
>
> Well, The following scheme is proposed (from what I read btoh from
> openBsd and Debia
Hi,
Here is my laptop partition, with sizes and the amount that is
free.
,
| FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
| /dev/mapper/spark_vg-root_lv
| 4.0G 554M 3.2G 15% /
| /dev/mapper/spark_vg-home_lv
|24G 7.4G 16G
As Eduardo suggested, LVM is a good bet since it alows you to resize
partitions. This is my partition scheme for my desktop (which i intend
to reinstall soon):
deb64:~# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 23G 6.4G 16G 30% /
tmpfs
ate partition is also interesting for the same reason (and /opt, if
you install software there).
It may also be interesting to use LVM, this makes resizing partitions
easier.
My scheme would be something like:
/ - 10Gb should be more than enough
/boot - 500Mb, if it must be separate
swap - depends, 1 o
On Fri,24.Oct.08, 23:02:51, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> Well, The following scheme is proposed (from what I read btoh from
> openBsd and Debian reference guide):
>
> Partition Suggested Size (openBsd)
>
> / 150 M
> /usr
me speed reasons are argued as well,
:)...
Well, The following scheme is proposed (from what I read btoh from
openBsd and Debian reference guide):
Partition Suggested Size (openBsd)
/ 150 M
/usr6 G
/var
On Friday, 22 Sep 2006 09:10:22 -0700, Bob McGowan wrote:
>> I recently upgrade a perfectly functional sarge laptop to etch. It has
>> one standard internal IDE hard drive. Now, about half the time it
>> boots up as hda, and the other half the time it boots up as hde. After
>> the initramfs stage,
Resending -- this didn't appear to go through properly the first time.
Kevin Mark wrote:
> > I recently upgrade a perfectly functional sarge laptop to etch. It has
> > one standard internal IDE hard drive. Now, about half the time it boots
> > up as hda, and the other half the time it boots up as
I can't help with the why, but I may have a 'fix'.
I had similar issues with a mixed ATA/SCSI system. The BIOS and Grub
would see the controllers and disks in one order, the kernel in a
different order.
I fixed my problem by using the disk label based identification feature.
This works for
Kevin Mark wrote:
> > I recently upgrade a perfectly functional sarge laptop to etch. It has
> > one standard internal IDE hard drive. Now, about half the time it boots
> > up as hda, and the other half the time it boots up as hde. After the
> > initramfs stage, if the drive is identified as hde, i
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 08:41:29PM -0400, Adam Rosi-Kessel wrote:
> I recently upgrade a perfectly functional sarge laptop to etch. It has
> one standard internal IDE hard drive. Now, about half the time it boots
> up as hda, and the other half the time it boots up as hde. After the
> initramfs sta
Adam Rosi-Kessel wrote:
I recently upgrade a perfectly functional sarge laptop to etch. It has
one standard internal IDE hard drive. Now, about half the time it boots
up as hda, and the other half the time it boots up as hde. After the
initramfs stage, if the drive is identified as hde, it fails
I recently upgrade a perfectly functional sarge laptop to etch. It has
one standard internal IDE hard drive. Now, about half the time it boots
up as hda, and the other half the time it boots up as hde. After the
initramfs stage, if the drive is identified as hde, it fails to boot
unless I create a
My installation of Sarge has a problem that I would like to fix:
When I run aptitude in a gnome-terminal window, most of the text
is rendered in dark grey on a black background. I find this
difficult to read. Is there some configuration file, like .muttrc
for mutt that I can use to try to fix the p
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 12:25:50PM +0100, Markus Grunwald wrote:
> Hello,
Hi
> How do I patch my 2.6 kernel with the new (four numbers) kernel version
> scheme ? Cound't find that in the archives ( or was too dumb to use the cor=
> rect
> search terms...).
>
> To be
Hello,
How do I patch my 2.6 kernel with the new (four numbers) kernel version
scheme ? Cound't find that in the archives ( or was too dumb to use the cor=
rect
search terms...).
To be concrete: which patch do I need to get from 2.6.13.4 to 2.6.14 ?
TIA
--
Markus Grunwald
Registered
On Monday 24 October 2005 12:10, Andy Streich wrote:
>On Sunday 23 October 2005 10:20 pm, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> > AFAIK, there is not a single vendor of PC's that provides a robust
>> > system out of the box that includes a ready-to-go backup/recovery
>> > procedure. It's always something left to th
On Sunday 23 October 2005 10:20 pm, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > AFAIK, there is not a single vendor of PC's that provides a robust system
> > out of the box that includes a ready-to-go backup/recovery procedure.
> > It's always something left to the user. It's like selling a car
> > without a spare an
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 05:50:46PM +0100, Bob Alexander wrote:
> I would like to transition from the "monopartition" to one with
> independent /, /home, /var, /tmp and /usr.
>
> Was about to make a mistake by using Partition magic to slice the
> current /dev/hda7 since it would have changed the
Situation:
1) running "monopartition" Debian on /dev/hda8
2) similar size spare partition on /dev/hda7 that can be sliced at will
3) /dev/hda5 FAT32 partition used as Windows XP "data partition"
First question:
I would like to transition from the "monopartition" to one with
independent /, /home, /
Once upon a time Henry Lenzi said...
>
> I am currently running Woody and I created a chrooted sid partition.
> Here's my current partition scheme for sid:
If sid is in a chroot, it does not have a partitioning scheme. It lives
on the filesystem on which woody was installed.
Hello --
I am currently running Woody and I created a chrooted sid partition.
Here's my current partition scheme for sid:
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2 4806080 4711892 0 100% /
/dev/hda5 38445841
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 19:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Introductory Computer Science should not be taught with C++ anyhow...
> CS should be introduced with Scheme. It's a superior teaching language.
>
> http://www.htdp.org/
> http://www.teach-scheme.org/
>
>
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 15:51 -0500, cecil wrote:
> He says we will only use Ansi C++
Introductory Computer Science should not be taught with C++ anyhow...
CS should be introduced with Scheme. It's a superior teaching language.
http://www.htdp.org/
http://www.teach-scheme.org/
The intr
Karsten M. Self ix.netcom.com> writes:
>
> Updated at http://twiki.iwethey.org/Main/NixPartitioning
>
Thanks for updating your info. Partitioning tends to confuse recent Windows
converts or those, like me, who started experimenting with Linux using a simple
two-partition configuration (root an
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:54:05 +, Mark wrote:
> Can you mix lvm and RAID?
Yes. RAID-5 at least three SCSI disks, and partition the RAID
with LVM2.
> Does it make sense?
Yes.
> Would it be just too much complexity?
Not quite.
--
Leandro GuimarÃes Far
on Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 06:10:11PM -0500, Al Davis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Friday 13 February 2004 02:49 pm, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > You've also left off a recovery partition. ?I keep a 256 MiB - 512
> > MiB partition on which a relatively minimal installation is kept.
>
> I would go fa
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
