Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:23:04PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
dpkg is one of those packages that has a lot of bugs but by and large
works pretty well. Looking purely at the number of bugs and ignoring the
fact that it's mostly very solid, tested code is n
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:23:04PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >dpkg is one of those packages that has a lot of bugs but by and large
> >works pretty well. Looking purely at the number of bugs and ignoring the
> >fact that it's mostly very solid, tested code is not really rati
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 08:26:28AM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
anyway, I guess I'll just be careful restarting WM and hope it'll get
fixed eventually... considering the number of old bugs (few years old)
it doesn't seem to make any sense to file bugs... are they
re-impplementi
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 08:26:28AM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> anyway, I guess I'll just be careful restarting WM and hope it'll get
> fixed eventually... considering the number of old bugs (few years old)
> it doesn't seem to make any sense to file bugs... are they
> re-impplementing most/all of
Craig Dickson wrote:
>
> Erik Steffl wrote:
>
> > looks like a bug in update-alternatives (dpkg), right? Is there any
> > way to verify what happened? I mean is there any history of changes or
> > something that I can check AFTER the fact (obviously, I cannot check
> > before since I don't know
Erik Steffl wrote:
> looks like a bug in update-alternatives (dpkg), right? Is there any
> way to verify what happened? I mean is there any history of changes or
> something that I can check AFTER the fact (obviously, I cannot check
> before since I don't know it's goingto happen, and even if
Jerome Acks Jr wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 03:09:33AM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
not sure when it happened, I guess it was during dist-upgrade, but
suddenly sawfish was the x-window-mananger (I definitely did not run
update-alternatives).
is this a bug or intented behaviour? If it's a "fe
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 03:09:33AM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> not sure when it happened, I guess it was during dist-upgrade, but
> suddenly sawfish was the x-window-mananger (I definitely did not run
> update-alternatives).
>
> is this a bug or intented behaviour? If it's a "feature, can it
not sure when it happened, I guess it was during dist-upgrade, but
suddenly sawfish was the x-window-mananger (I definitely did not run
update-alternatives).
is this a bug or intented behaviour? If it's a "feature, can it be
disabled?
This is pretty annoying, while it's not that hard to
9 matches
Mail list logo
