On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 01:43:36AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > Why? It might change, and you don't need it. apt-get --print-uris
> > gives you the URI and the filename. Since you have both, you can
> > either use wget's -O to put it in the right place when downloading,
> > or rename things to
> Why? It might change, and you don't need it. apt-get --print-uris
> gives you the URI and the filename. Since you have both, you can
> either use wget's -O to put it in the right place when downloading,
> or rename things to the correct filename afterwards.
In http://jidanni.org/comp/apt-offl
Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps someone can resubmit http://bugs.debian.org/231776 so the
> strategy behind
> $ man apt-get
>--print-uris
> can get documented somewhere.
Why? It might change, and you don't need it. apt-get --print-uris
gives you the URI and the filename.
Perhaps someone can resubmit http://bugs.debian.org/231776 so the
strategy behind
$ man apt-get
--print-uris
Note that the file name to write to will not always match the file
name on the remote site!
can get documented somewhere.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 09:36:50AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Say, apt-get dist-upgrade --print-uris makes lines with URL FILE SIZE MD5.
> What are the bad things that might happen if I just use wget to get
> the URLs, without using the FILEname? I intend to use
> dpkg-scanpackages later.
>
> H
Say, apt-get dist-upgrade --print-uris makes lines with URL FILE SIZE MD5.
What are the bad things that might happen if I just use wget to get
the URLs, without using the FILEname? I intend to use
dpkg-scanpackages later.
Hopefully the URLs are OK on Windows and CDROMs too, which I might
need to
6 matches
Mail list logo
