Re: getting ssh -X to work. (Was: sane access for non-root user)

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:28:18PM -0500, Brad Sawatzky wrote: > > > > A quick workaround to initialize an up-to-date login environment is to > > 'ssh -X localhost' from within a local shell... > > I just tried that on my sarge system., whose ssh

Re: getting ssh -X to work. (Was: sane access for non-root user)

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:02:04PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:28:18PM -0500, Brad Sawatzky wrote: > > > > A quick workaround to initialize an up-to-date login environment is to > > 'ssh -X localhost' from within a local shell... > > I just tried that on my sarge

Re: getting ssh -X to work. (Was: sane access for non-root user)

> Evidently, something more is needed than just ssh -X localhost. > some additional package maybe? Enable X11Forwarding in /etc/ssh/sshd_config (server). Regards. -- Homepage : http://geocities.com/arhuaco The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to

getting ssh -X to work. (Was: sane access for non-root user)

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:28:18PM -0500, Brad Sawatzky wrote: > > A quick workaround to initialize an up-to-date login environment is to > 'ssh -X localhost' from within a local shell... I just tried that on my sarge system., whose ssh documentation does mention ssh. But in the new shell env

Re: sane access for non-root user

On 12/14/05, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 13 December 2005 at 20:53:09 -0500, Darryl Clarke wrote: > > On 12/13/05, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 13 December 2005 at 14:01:06 -0500, Darryl Clarke wrote: > > > > > > > > udev isn't setting permis

Re: sane access for non-root user

On Tuesday, 13 December 2005 at 20:53:09 -0500, Darryl Clarke wrote: > On 12/13/05, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 13 December 2005 at 14:01:06 -0500, Darryl Clarke wrote: > > > > > > udev isn't setting permissions properly on the device, I would imagine. > > > > > > I for

Re: sane access for non-root user

On Tuesday, 13 December 2005 at 18:42:38 -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > There's the 'newgrp' command if you want to avoid losing your X session > and can stand winning just one shell at a time. 'sg' is somewhat > analagous to 'su', though at atomic number 106. I think that was Rf when I was a

Re: sane access for non-root user

Quoting Darryl Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 12/13/05, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday, 13 December 2005 at 14:01:06 -0500, Darryl Clarke wrote: > On 12/13/05, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > Installed xsane > > and can only access it as root. Added mysel

Re: sane access for non-root user

on Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 04:49:46PM -0500, Paul Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > %% Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> You may have to log out of your Xsession and log in again to get > >> shells spawned using the new/updated group assignments. (Is there > >> a more efficient

Re: sane access for non-root user

On 12/13/05, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 13 December 2005 at 14:01:06 -0500, Darryl Clarke wrote: > > On 12/13/05, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > > Installed xsane > > > and can only access it as root. Added myself to scanner group, but > > > still

Re: sane access for non-root user

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Richard Lyons wrote: > On Tuesday, 13 December 2005 at 14:28:18 -0500, Brad Sawatzky wrote: > > > On 12/13/05, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > > > Installed xsane > > > > and can only access it as root. Added myself to scanner group, but > > > > still xsa

Re: sane access for non-root user

%% Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> You may have to log out of your Xsession and log in again to get >> shells spawned using the new/updated group assignments. (Is there >> a more efficient way to do this? This seems really inelegant.) rl> More than that, I logged out and ba

Re: sane access for non-root user

Brad Sawatzky wrote: Are you sure that the group change (ie. adding yourself to 'scanner') has been applied to the shell you're running xsane from? (Check the output of 'groups' or 'id -Gn'). You may have to log out of your Xsession and log in again to get shells spawned using the new/updated g

Re: sane access for non-root user

On Tuesday, 13 December 2005 at 14:01:06 -0500, Darryl Clarke wrote: > On 12/13/05, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > Installed xsane > > and can only access it as root. Added myself to scanner group, but > > still xsane finds 'no devices available' as ordinary user. Can someone

Re: sane access for non-root user

On Tuesday, 13 December 2005 at 14:28:18 -0500, Brad Sawatzky wrote: > > On 12/13/05, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > > Installed xsane > > > and can only access it as root. Added myself to scanner group, but > > > still xsane finds 'no devices available' as ordinary user. > >

Re: sane access for non-root user

> On 12/13/05, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've just spent over an hour googling in vain. And I am sure I should > > know the answer to this... > > > > New sid install (on a not-new Dell Inspiron 8200 FWIW). Installed xsane > > and can only access it as root. Added myself to sca

Re: sane access for non-root user

On 12/13/05, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just spent over an hour googling in vain. And I am sure I should > know the answer to this... > > New sid install (on a not-new Dell Inspiron 8200 FWIW). Installed xsane > and can only access it as root. Added myself to scanner group,

sane access for non-root user

I've just spent over an hour googling in vain. And I am sure I should know the answer to this... New sid install (on a not-new Dell Inspiron 8200 FWIW). Installed xsane and can only access it as root. Added myself to scanner group, but still xsane finds 'no devices available' as ordinary user.