Re: samba-common = 3.0.23d-4 but 3.0.24-2 is installed

2007-02-06 Thread Justin Hartman
Actually ignore my email below. I ran the apt-get -f install again and get no more errors. It looks like your solution worked and my package is now upgraded. Thanks for the help. I really do appreciate it! On 2/7/07, Justin Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok now we're getting somewhere. I ad

Re: samba-common = 3.0.23d-4 but 3.0.24-2 is installed

2007-02-06 Thread Justin Hartman
Ok now we're getting somewhere. I added the symbolic link and this fixed up a lot of the errors but I still get one. See my output as follows: debian:/home/justin# cd /etc/rc2.d/ debian:/etc/rc2.d# ln -sf ../init.d/samba K09samba debian:/etc/rc2.d# apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done

Re: samba-common = 3.0.23d-4 but 3.0.24-2 is installed

2007-02-06 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 00:44:21 +0200, Justin Hartman wrote: > On 2/7/07, Florian Kulzer wrote: > >Just to be sure: Comment out the rest of the script, i.e. add a "#" > >character at the beginning of every remaining line. > > Done but still get same error when apt-get -f install It seems like th

Re: samba-common = 3.0.23d-4 but 3.0.24-2 is installed

2007-02-06 Thread Justin Hartman
On 2/7/07, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just to be sure: Comment out the rest of the script, i.e. add a "#" character at the beginning of every remaining line. Done but still get same error when apt-get -f install If you still get the complaint from invoke.rc-d then we have to lo

Re: samba-common = 3.0.23d-4 but 3.0.24-2 is installed

2007-02-06 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 23:59:17 +0200, Justin Hartman wrote: > On 2/6/07, Florian Kulzer wrote: > >"samba.prerm" might work even better... > > Yes that indeed does work better. I added the exit 0 below the > #!/bin/sh but running the apt-get -f install still returns the same > errors. Is this a b

Re: samba-common = 3.0.23d-4 but 3.0.24-2 is installed

2007-02-06 Thread Justin Hartman
On 2/6/07, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "samba.prerm" might work even better... Yes that indeed does work better. I added the exit 0 below the #!/bin/sh but running the apt-get -f install still returns the same errors. Is this a bug or is it something just with my system? -- Regard

Re: samba-common = 3.0.23d-4 but 3.0.24-2 is installed

2007-02-06 Thread Justin Hartman
On 2/6/07, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think you are misunderstanding the output of your "apt-get -f install" command: It wants to replace samba 3.0.23d-4 with version 3.0.24-2. This is a normal upgrade attempt. The problem is that the pre-removal script of the package fails for s

Re: samba-common = 3.0.23d-4 but 3.0.24-2 is installed

2007-02-06 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 22:37:42 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote: [...] > /var/lib/dpkg/info/sambe.prerm ^^^ "samba.prerm" might work even better... -- Regards, Florian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: samba-common = 3.0.23d-4 but 3.0.24-2 is installed

2007-02-06 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 22:06:20 +0200, Justin Hartman wrote: > I'm trying to figure this out but apt is telling me that samba-common > installed on my machine is 3.0.24-2 but the new updated version it > wants to upgrade to is 3.0.23d-4 which is lower. How is this possible? I think you are misund

samba-common = 3.0.23d-4 but 3.0.24-2 is installed

2007-02-06 Thread Justin Hartman
I'm trying to figure this out but apt is telling me that samba-common installed on my machine is 3.0.24-2 but the new updated version it wants to upgrade to is 3.0.23d-4 which is lower. How is this possible? I now can't upgrade, install, remove or anything using apt because of this error and I'm