Re: runq missing

1997-05-01 Thread Rick Jones
Yea. I found it a few hours ago. I never checked my root crontab since I never added anything to it, but smail did when it was installed and never removed it when it was removed. Another guy told me to check daemon and uucp crontabs. While I was looking I checked my root crontab and there it w

Re: runq missing

1997-05-01 Thread Craig Sanders
On Thu, 1 May 1997, Rick Jones wrote: > I updated to frozen bo and now I get email from cron saying > > /bin/sh: runq: command not found > > Anybody have this problem? > > When I did the upgrade I swithced from smail to sendmail. runq is a part of smail, not sendmail. with sendmail, just run '

runq missing

1997-05-01 Thread Rick Jones
I updated to frozen bo and now I get email from cron saying /bin/sh: runq: command not found Anybody have this problem? When I did the upgrade I swithced from smail to sendmail. Cron experiences this error every 20 min's. 0,20,40 min's in the hour. I checked crontab, daily, wee

Re: Runq missing from cron package ?

1996-08-22 Thread Ronald van Loon
|" |" |"> a small question: after a successful install of Debian by FTP, the cron |"> process generates a lot of output along the lines of "runq: command not |"> found". I could not find it either. Is this a bug or a feature ? :-) |" |"What kind of mail-transport agent are you using. On my system

Re: Runq missing from cron package ?

1996-08-22 Thread Erick Branderhorst
> a small question: after a successful install of Debian by FTP, the cron > process generates a lot of output along the lines of "runq: command not > found". I could not find it either. Is this a bug or a feature ? :-) What kind of mail-transport agent are you using. On my system runq is part of

Runq missing from cron package ?

1996-08-22 Thread Ronald van Loon
Hello Debian-world, a small question: after a successful install of Debian by FTP, the cron process generates a lot of output along the lines of "runq: command not found". I could not find it either. Is this a bug or a feature ? :-) -- Ronald van Loon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])