On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 23:55:09 +0200, martin f krafft writes:
>
>RIP, HELLO, OSPF, BGP, EGP, SPREAD
>
>all these are routing protocols. RIP, HELLO, and EGP are
>distance/vector based, OSPF and SPREAD are link-state based, but what
>exactly do these mean? do you have a comprehensi
otocol.
OTOH OSPF is a link-state protocol which does take bandwidth and speed
into account (in fact it takes the link type into account). I forgot
to mention that OSPF was link-state.
Almost all routing protocols give you the ability to assign weights to
routes so that one is preferred over t
* Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.10.10 17:08:15-0500]:
> We're way off topic here. Any decent networking with IP text will
> answer these questions.
again, sorry. i panicked. much more chilled this morning. thanks for
your reply. please excuse the abuse of debian-user, it's your own
bl
* Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 11:55:09PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > RIP, HELLO, OSPF, BGP, EGP, SPREAD
> >
> We're way off topic here. Any decent networking with IP text will
> answer these questions.
...
> > EGP: also similar, but used bet
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 11:55:09PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> RIP, HELLO, OSPF, BGP, EGP, SPREAD
>
> all these are routing protocols. RIP, HELLO, and EGP are
> distance/vector based, OSPF and SPREAD are link-state based, but what
> exactly do these mean? do you have a compre
RIP, HELLO, OSPF, BGP, EGP, SPREAD
all these are routing protocols. RIP, HELLO, and EGP are
distance/vector based, OSPF and SPREAD are link-state based, but what
exactly do these mean? do you have a comprehensive webpage?
am i right:
RIP: routers communicate between each other to inform each
6 matches
Mail list logo
