On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 11:22 PM Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 06:46:20PM -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> > I have been working out how to have my server setup with OSPF routing.
>
> I have no operational experience of OSPF nor FRR. I do what yo
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 11:57 PM Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 06:54:10PM -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> > I changed the default gateway config to:
> > ### Configure Static IP addresses and default gateway's.
> > auto eth0
> > iface eth0 inet static
> > address 10.1
Timothy M Butterworth <
>> timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I have been working out how to have my server setup with OSPF routing. I
>>> have two network interfaces each configured with a /30 and one dummy
>>> loop
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 7:35 PM Timothy M Butterworth <
timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 6:46 PM Timothy M Butterworth <
> timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I have been working out how to have
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 6:46 PM Timothy M Butterworth <
timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have been working out how to have my server setup with OSPF routing. I
> have two network interfaces each configured with a /30 and one dummy
> loopback configured wi
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 06:54:10PM -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> I changed the default gateway config to:
> ### Configure Static IP addresses and default gateway's.
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 10.1.1.2/30
> up route add -net default gw 10.1.1.1 metric 1024 dev et
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 06:46:20PM -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> I have been working out how to have my server setup with OSPF routing.
I have no operational experience of OSPF nor FRR. I do what you're doing
but with BIRD, BGP and ECMP. I think you'll probably need to
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 6:46 PM Timothy M Butterworth <
timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have been working out how to have my server setup with OSPF routing. I
> have two network interfaces each configured with a /30 and one dummy
> loopback configured wi
All,
I have been working out how to have my server setup with OSPF routing. I
have two network interfaces each configured with a /30 and one dummy
loopback configured with a /32. The goal is to have the /32 address
advertised in DNS so traffic can use per-session load balancing across both
/30&#
On 22/3/21 5:17 am, Dan Ritter wrote:
ghe2001 wrote:
There are 2 computers on my LAN. I'll call one Fast and the other Slow. When
I, for example, type ping www.cbs.com, Fast pings right away, Slow pauses for
about 5 seconds ('time' says that). When I ping something in /etc/hosts, both
sta
ghe2001 wrote:
> There are 2 computers on my LAN. I'll call one Fast and the other Slow.
> When I, for example, type ping www.cbs.com, Fast pings right away, Slow
> pauses for about 5 seconds ('time' says that). When I ping something in
> /etc/hosts, both start right away. On Slow, 'route'
ng something in /etc/hosts, both
start right away. On Slow, 'route' takes the 5 second pause, but 'route -n' is
fast. On Fast, both are equally snappy.
It didn't used to be that way. They both used to be snappy. And I can't
figure out why.
Routing tables:
Fas
Vincenzo Villa wrote:
> It seem a sort of cache, but no effect with ip route flush or ip rule
> flush.
look at arp
private
> IP address.
>
> I have two routing tables and some rule to select actual route. For
> example:
> ip route add 192.168.111.0/24 dev ens192 table ISPB
> ip route add default via 192.168.111.254 table ISPB
> ip route add 192.168.10.0/24 dev ens256 table ISPA
> ip route add
Hi all
I have a router (Buster) with two Internet connection. Some workstation
use the first connection, others the second one, based on their private
IP address.
I have two routing tables and some rule to select actual route. For
example:
ip route add 192.168.111.0/24 dev ens192 table ISPB
ip
On 17/12/19 5:06 pm, Richard Hector wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a networking issue that's confusing me.
Got it, I think.
I had previously been applying rules before switching to iptables-legacy
- so I'd been adding nftables rules. Then I switched, without flushing
(or rebooting), so both rules
ce of this router being on the same
address range (too many people choose 192.168.1.0/24)
Here's the routing table:
8<
richard@svrouter:~$ sudo ip route
default via 192.168.1.1 dev enp4s0.1 onlink
10.144.1.0/24 dev enp4s0.1441 proto kernel scope link src 1
Hi,
I don’t know if this is the right place to ask, if my problem is not too
specific or something.
Is source-specific routing possible under debian? I think this is what
I need in my case ("multihoming" I think): on my laptop I'm generally
connected too zero up to two differents
On 2018-08-16, john doe wrote:
> This configuration assumes that the clients will get "all configuration"
> from the server.
Initially I had a problem importing my VPN settings to network
manager. Now I see it is working and I was able to fill in the gaps so
I got a working VPN connection.
I di
On 8/16/2018 8:53 AM, Piotr Martyniuk wrote:
On 2018-08-16, john doe wrote:
On the vpn client are you getting the proper DNS in '/etc/resolv.conf'
when connected to your vpn server?
It changes (adds nameserver 192.168.2.1 on top), but this does not
seems to be valid as the IP's I got are from
On 2018-08-16, john doe wrote:
> On the vpn client are you getting the proper DNS in '/etc/resolv.conf'
> when connected to your vpn server?
It changes (adds nameserver 192.168.2.1 on top), but this does not
seems to be valid as the IP's I got are from the network 10.8.0.xx and
the one I got is
On 8/16/2018 7:56 AM, Piotr Martyniuk wrote:
On 2018-08-06, Joe wrote:
I believe it should happen by default, this is almost always what you
want. I'm fairly sure I've never had to ask for this.
When the VPN connects, Network Manager should adjust routing so that
the VPN becomes t
On 2018-08-06, Joe wrote:
> I believe it should happen by default, this is almost always what you
> want. I'm fairly sure I've never had to ask for this.
>
> When the VPN connects, Network Manager should adjust routing so that
> the VPN becomes the default gateway.
ure I've never had to ask for this.
>
> When the VPN connects, Network Manager should adjust routing so that
> the VPN becomes the default gateway. To disable this behaviour, there
> is a tick box somewhere in IP properties of the VPN connection, I think.
>
That is usually somethin
ailable).
>
> The only problem is that I do not know how to do this.
I believe it should happen by default, this is almost always what you
want. I'm fairly sure I've never had to ask for this.
When the VPN connects, Network Manager should adjust routing so that
the VPN becomes th
Hi,
On Debian Stretch I managed to configure VPN connection using network-
manager. Now I would like to redirect all traffic to VPN (whenever VPN is
available) and revert back to current state (if VPN is not available).
The only problem is that I do not know how to do this.
Kind regads,
Piotr
Hi,
On Debian Stretch I managed to configure VPN connection using network-
manager. Now I would like to redirect all traffic to VPN (whenever VPN is
available) and revert back to current state (if VPN is not available).
The only problem is that I do not know how to do this.
Kind regads,
Piotr
[This mail was also posted to linux.debian.user.]
Hi,
On Debian Stretch I managed to configure VPN connection using network-
manager. Now I would like to redirect all traffic to VPN (whenever VPN is
available) and revert back to current state (if VPN is not available).
The only problem is that I
On 05/06/2016 04:43 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 05/05/2016 21:05, ken a écrit :
Working on the Pi just from the bash prompt as root, how do I set the
routing table (etc.) to connect directly to the DSL modem? The routing
table on my router currently shows:
# route -n
Kernel IP routing
Le 05/05/2016 21:05, ken a écrit :
Working on the Pi just from the bash prompt as root, how do I set the
routing table (etc.) to connect directly to the DSL modem? The routing
table on my router currently shows:
# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask
e as the source of the problem except the DSL modem
and the RPi. Since, however, I get the same results on four other nodes
inside the house as I get from the Pi, the problem is likely not the Pi's.
Setting up for testing:
Working on the Pi just from the bash prompt as root, how do I se
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:18:08 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> Here is my routing table:
>
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.25.68 0.0.0.0 UG0 00
> eth0 192.168.24.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 1 0
> 0 eth0
>
> The first entry IS my
On Wednesday 04 March 2015 21:39:16 David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Gene Heskett (ghesk...@wdtv.com):
> > On Wednesday 04 March 2015 18:34:17 Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> > > > That looks 10% legit to me.
> > >
> > > 10% ? Is it a typo or a joke? :-)
> >
> > Thats a genuine typu, s/b 100%. 80yo fingers
Quoting Gene Heskett (ghesk...@wdtv.com):
>
>
> On Wednesday 04 March 2015 18:34:17 Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> > > That looks 10% legit to me.
> >
> > 10% ? Is it a typo or a joke? :-)
>
> Thats a genuine typu, s/b 100%. 80yo fingers don't always type what my
> brain tells them... :(
However, y
Did you mean typo? :P (Yeah I understand typos from you now.)
The table does not appear to have problems, you can always nmap it though,
it tells what it is, in terms of operating system and open ports.
(sudo apt-get install nmap)
nmap -sV [IPv4 Address]
On Thursday, March 5, 2015, Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 04 March 2015 18:34:17 Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> > That looks 10% legit to me.
>
> 10% ? Is it a typo or a joke? :-)
Thats a genuine typu, s/b 100%. 80yo fingers don't always type what my
brain tells them... :(
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense o
Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> Here is my routing table:
>
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.25.68 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0
> 192.168.24.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 1 00 eth0
>
> The first entry IS my default gateway as I expected.
>
>
On 03/04/2015 03:18 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
Here is my routing table:
0.0.0.0 192.168.25.68 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0
192.168.24.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 1 00 eth0
The first entry IS my default gateway as I expected.
The second line
> That looks 10% legit to me.
10% ? Is it a typo or a joke? :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/md84pp$t22$1...@ger.gmane.org
On Wednesday 04 March 2015 18:18:08 Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> Here is my routing table:
>
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.25.68 0.0.0.0 UG0 00
> eth0 192.168.24.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 1 0
> 0 eth0
>
> The first entry IS my
Here is my routing table:
0.0.0.0 192.168.25.68 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0
192.168.24.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 1 00 eth0
The first entry IS my default gateway as I expected.
The second line, however, is something I cannot neither recognize
> On 13/11/14 11:10, Luis Finotti wrote:
> > Ah, that worked! Could you explain the "192.168.29.0/24" syntax
> > though? I'm having a hard time finding what it means. (Is it a range
> > 0 to 24?)
>
> The "/24" means that only the first 24 bits of the address are
> significant for matching purpos
On 13/11/14 11:10, Luis Finotti wrote:
Ah, that worked! Could you explain the "192.168.29.0/24" syntax
though? I'm having a hard time finding what it means. (Is it a range
0 to 24?)
The "/24" means that only the first 24 bits of the address are
significant for matching purposes. So, 192.168
r computers connected to the same router). From
>> within the network, nothing works (SSH, Samba, minidlna...).
>
> Apparently your router is doing a bad job, not forwarding packets from
> LAN to LAN. Anyway, it is better to add an exception to the default
> route for the LAN subn
your router is doing a bad job, not forwarding packets from
LAN to LAN. Anyway, it is better to add an exception to the default
route for the LAN subnet in table 10 to make the routing direct :
ip route add 192.168.29.0/24 dev eth0 table 10
(If required, replace "eth0" with whatever the LAN in
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
>
> On 13/11/2014 6:17 AM, "Luis Finotti" wrote:
>>
>> I'm having problems connecting to my desktop (running actually
>> aptosid, which is virtually simply Debian Sid with a different kernel
>> and a few extra tools and customizations).
>>
>> H
I'm having problems connecting to my desktop (running actually
aptosid, which is virtually simply Debian Sid with a different kernel
and a few extra tools and customizations).
Here is the situation: my desktop is connected to a VPN service. (The
router to which the desktop is connected is not, on
On Ma, 05 aug 14, 13:01:48, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > I'm not very familiar with Gmail's interface, but Outlook definitely
> > does have threaded views.
>
> As of the last time I used Outlook a couple of years ago Outlook did
> not have threads but had "conversations". O
On 20140804_2358+0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 03 aug 14, 13:28:06, Bob Proulx wrote:
> >
> > P.S. I still think digests are less desirable because I don't see a
> > way to view the discussion in a threaded view. Threaded views have
> > been around for so long that I couldn't live without
On 8/5/2014 10:24 PM, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20140805_0004+0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> On Lu, 04 aug 14, 08:52:17, Paul E Condon wrote:
>>>
>>> I've spent some time recently, trying to use the Gmail browser
>>> interface. I would never switch to it from Mutt, excepting only if
>>> Microsoft d
On 20140805_0004+0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 04 aug 14, 08:52:17, Paul E Condon wrote:
> >
> > I've spent some time recently, trying to use the Gmail browser
> > interface. I would never switch to it from Mutt, excepting only if
> > Microsoft does a corporate take-over of Debian (They are
! :)
--
Isaac Freeman - Systems Administrator
IBM SmartCloud Managed Backup
is...@us.ibm.com
919-254-0245
From: Pascal Hambourg
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org,
Cc: Isaac Freeman/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Date: 08/02/2014 02:45 PM
Subject:Re: Network routing on multi-homed system
Hello
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > P.S. I still think digests are less desirable because I don't see a
> > way to view the discussion in a threaded view. Threaded views have
> > been around for so long that I couldn't live without them. Of course
> > Gmail and Outlook users don't have
On Monday 04 August 2014 21:58:36 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> I'm not very familiar with Gmail's interface
Lucky you. ;-)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debi
On Lu, 04 aug 14, 08:52:17, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> I've spent some time recently, trying to use the Gmail browser
> interface. I would never switch to it from Mutt, excepting only if
> Microsoft does a corporate take-over of Debian (They are both
> corporations under the Law, and under the Law,
On Du, 03 aug 14, 13:28:06, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> P.S. I still think digests are less desirable because I don't see a
> way to view the discussion in a threaded view. Threaded views have
> been around for so long that I couldn't live without them. Of course
> Gmail and Outlook users don't have t
On 20140803_1328-0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > I used a variety of mailers back then and I don't recall which ones
> > handled digests nicely and which did not.
>
> I just tested mutt and digests and mutt handles message digests quite
> well. And furthermore because the Debian l
On Sunday 03 August 2014 15:48:54 Steve Litt wrote:
> LOL, Kmail2 breaks your entire email universe:
>
> http://troubleshooters.com/lpm/201202/201202.htm
Steve, that article basically refers to KDE4 (Nepomuk? Akonadi? Ubuntu
11.10?), which we can agree is a monstrosity, IMHO anyway.
Lisi
--
T
On Dom, 03 Ago 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
The inability of people to deal with digest messages these days is the
main reason I think digests should be removed as a mailing list
option.
+1 to that.
I'd also like a filter that rejects mails that have Re: (and
variations) in the Subject and no In-
Bob Proulx wrote:
> I used a variety of mailers back then and I don't recall which ones
> handled digests nicely and which did not.
I just tested mutt and digests and mutt handles message digests quite
well. And furthermore because the Debian lists includes the
individual messages as MIME attemen
David Baron wrote:
> > Replying from the digest breaks threads. I eschew KDE 4, so I don't know
> > about KMail in KDE4, but KDE3 KMail does not break threads.
>
> I do not understand the difference. If I hit reply, so I get the
> title of the digest which I replace with the desired re: Sho
On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 12:38:16 -0400
AW wrote:
Hello AW,
>lists. So, I don't know what I'm doing with regards to top/bottom
>postings, quoting, etc... There are many good reasons why a particular
Based on that and what you go on to say, it's obvious you're willing to
learn about what is or isn'
On Sunday 03 August 2014 15:48:54 Steve Litt wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:41:06 +0100
>
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 July 2014 20:09:41 Brian wrote:
> > > When you reply threading is broken. Surely you can see that. Could
> > > be kmail of course.
> >
> > Replying from the digest break
On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 16:41:17 +0100
Brad Rogers wrote:
>Quite an achievement, given that
>99.% of MUAs quote correctly "out of the box".
I'm fairly old to Debian. I run a few email servers. I know the ins
and outs of lots of things. And yet, I've rarely posted to mailing
lists. So, I don
On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 10:55:00 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
Hello Steve,
>Yes, but *not* changing the Subject is an atrocity. I've often thought
>of piping everything with digest type Subjects to /dev/null. Another
>atrocity is these guys who leave the entire digest intact when replying.
I tend to agre
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:42:53 +0100
Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:14:20 +0300
> David Baron wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
> >Or is there some header or marker I should be hitting as well?
>
> Reference and/or Reply-To headers. The digest, depending on /exactly/
> how it as construct
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:41:06 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 July 2014 20:09:41 Brian wrote:
> > When you reply threading is broken. Surely you can see that. Could
> > be kmail of course.
>
> Replying from the digest breaks threads. I eschew KDE 4, so I don't
> know about KMail in KDE4,
Hello,
Isaac Freeman a écrit :
>
> iface eth1 inet static
> address 172.1.1.40
> netmask 255.255.255.224
>
> # routing
> post-up ip route add 172.1.1.62/32 dev eth1 src 172.1.1.40 table
> external
> post-up ip route add default vi
I'm not subscribed to the list, so please make sure my actual e-mail
address is on copy if you reply.
This is a slightly complicated network routing issue so please bear with me
while I try to organize all the relevant info.
So, I'm setting up a secondary DNS server to act as a s
On Wednesday 30 July 2014 08:14:20 David Baron wrote:
> I do not understand the difference. If I hit reply, so I get the title of
> the digest which I replace with the desired re: Should not this be OK.
No. It gives rise to a new thread, with the digest data, which is not the
same as the he
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:26:04 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
Hello The,
>(References: and In-Reply-To:, surely?)
You are, of course, right. My brain was waaay ahead of my fingers at
the time. My apologies for any confusion caused.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/30/2014 04:42 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:14:20 +0300 David Baron
> wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
>> Or is there some header or marker I should be hitting as well?
>
> Reference and/or Reply-To headers.
(References: and In
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:14:20 +0300
David Baron wrote:
Hello David,
>Or is there some header or marker I should be hitting as well?
Reference and/or Reply-To headers. The digest, depending on /exactly/
how it as constructed and /exactly/ how you reply, won't necessarily
carry the right headers
On Wednesday 30 July 2014 02:52:38 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
wrote:
> > When you reply threading is broken. Surely you can see that. Could be
> > kmail of course.
>
> Replying from the digest breaks threads. I eschew KDE 4, so I don't know
> about KMail in KDE4, but KDE3 KMail
On Tuesday 29 July 2014 20:09:41 Brian wrote:
> When you reply threading is broken. Surely you can see that. Could be
> kmail of course.
Replying from the digest breaks threads. I eschew KDE 4, so I don't know
about KMail in KDE4, but KDE3 KMail does not break threads.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Tue 29 Jul 2014 at 21:44:36 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 July 2014 16:23:21 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
> wrote:
> > system_notification is qualified by the mailname, dovidhalevi.homelinux.net.
> > dovidhalevi.homelinux.net is regarded as a local domain. The mail i
On Tuesday 29 July 2014 16:23:21 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
wrote:
> system_notification is qualified by the mailname, dovidhalevi.homelinux.net.
> dovidhalevi.homelinux.net is regarded as a local domain. The mail is routed
> and transported by procmail.
>
>
> > Sure looks in o
On Mon 28 Jul 2014 at 19:01:16 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> > 'exim -bt ' might help.
>
> ~$ sudo exim4 -bt system_notification
> R: system_aliases for system_notificat...@dovidhalevi.homelinux.net
> R: userforward for system_notificat...@dovidhalevi.homelinux.net
> R: procmail for system_notifica
net
> or, if there is no MX record, whatever machine is reached on port 25
> at the IP address pointed to by
> dovidhalevi.homelinux.net ?
I am not sure I understand the question. In any event, this routing is meant
for internal mail only.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-req
x.homelinux.net pointed to (I used a 3G network), or
(b) set /etc/hosts on the exim machine to point xxx.homelinux.net to
itself so that exim made no attempt to signal externally.
You may already have checked this, but this just seems to me to have a
sense of being a routing problem, rather tha
On Monday 28 July 2014 15:21:36 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
wrote:
> > Now, if I simply send to a user, the mail will be delivered.
> > If I simply send to "root," it gets correctly aliased over to
> > "system_notifications," but then gets returned!
> >
> >
> >
> > So original pr
On Mon 28 Jul 2014 at 10:34:04 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> On Sunday 27 July 2014 23:45:44 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
> wrote:
> > > > /etc/mailname
> > >
> > > localhost.localdomain
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This is the first answer on the reconfig, probably should not be this
On 2014-07-28, David Baron wrote:
>
> Now, if I simply send to a user, the mail will be delivered.
> If I simply send to "root," it gets correctly aliased over to
> "system_notifications," but then gets returned!
I don't know what "aliased over to system notifications" means, but "the
forwarding
On Sunday 27 July 2014 23:45:44 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
wrote:
> > > /etc/mailname
> >
> > localhost.localdomain
> >
> >
> >
> > This is the first answer on the reconfig, probably should not be this?
>
> This is not ok. Exim uses what is in /etc/mailname to qualify an addr
On Sun 27 Jul 2014 at 17:34:54 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> #dc_eximconfig_configtype='internet'
> dc_eximconfig_configtype='smarthost'
> dc_other_hostnames='dovidhalevi.homelinux.net'
> dc_local_interfaces=''
> #dc_readhost='d_baron'
> dc_readhost='dovidhalevi.homelinux.net'
> dc_relay_domains=''
> > Cannot send mail to user@localhost.localdomain. Fully formed address will
> > work.
>
> What is a "Fully formed address"? Please post here the contents of
Something with real name@hostname.domainname rather than
localhost.localdomain.
>
> /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf
#dc_eximconfig
On Sun 27 Jul 2014 at 14:06:21 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> Cannot send mail to user@localhost.localdomain. Fully formed address will
> work.
What is a "Fully formed address"? Please post here the contents of
/etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf
/etc/hosts
/etc/mailname
> Applications suc
Cannot send mail to user@localhost.localdomain. Fully formed address will
work.
Applications such as rkhunter and cron-apt that send mail to root--mail is not
received. There is a "system_notification" user and root is aliased to this.
Explicit send to root using "mail" fails regardless of whet
Hi all,
I have an XCP host based on Debian, that contains a number of virtual
machines for my internal network. A basic diagram of my network is here:
https://www.gently.org.uk/gently-network.jpeg
The 'gateway' vm is the only thing connected directly to the cable modem.
eth0 receives its IP addr
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:09:48PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Paul Scott a écrit :
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:28:41AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> >> As a workaround until an update fixes the bug, I guess you can manually
> >> disable the wired ethernet interface in NetworkManager when
Paul Scott a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:28:41AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>> As a workaround until an update fixes the bug, I guess you can manually
>> disable the wired ethernet interface in NetworkManager when you don't
>> use it.
>
> Do mean in /etc/network/interfaces?
No. I wrot
But hey, this is sid.
> As a workaround until an update fixes the bug, I guess you can manually
> disable the wired ethernet interface in NetworkManager when you don't
> use it.
Do mean in /etc/network/interfaces?
It is disabled there now.
Interestly I just booted Linux to find wire
Paul Scott a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 08:36:04PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>>>
>>> route gives me:
>>>
>>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
>>> Iface
>>> default * 0.0.0.0 U 1002 00 eth0
>> You have a b
-local shouldn't be there).
> > >
> > > I am using isc-dhcp-client.
> >
> > Ok, but is there a functional DHCP _server_ on your LAN?
>
> Yes. This laptop installation worked fine until a couple of weeks
> ago.
>
> Wireless is now workin
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:56:55PM +0200, B wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:19:12 -0700
> Paul Scott wrote:
>
> > No change.
> >
> > > Also set a DHCP server up (link-local shouldn't be there).
> >
> > I am using isc-dhcp-client.
>
> Ok, but is there a functional DHCP _server_ on your LAN?
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:19:12 -0700
Paul Scott wrote:
> No change.
>
> > Also set a DHCP server up (link-local shouldn't be there).
>
> I am using isc-dhcp-client.
Ok, but is there a functional DHCP _server_ on your LAN?
Join your /etc/network/interfaces
--
Nikos : if theree was alcooohlin w
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 08:36:04PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Paul Scott a écrit :
> >
> > I have a sid system on this laptop that I keep updated. A week or two
> > ago an update broke my ability to connect to the Internet through wireless
> > access points. I am now connected wirelessly
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 08:30:19PM +0200, B wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:04:16 -0700
> Paul Scott wrote:
>
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric
> > RefUse Iface default * 0.0.0.0
> > U 1002 00 eth0 default 192.168.
Paul Scott a écrit :
>
> I have a sid system on this laptop that I keep updated. A week or two
> ago an update broke my ability to connect to the Internet through wireless
> access points. I am now connected wirelessly to my server with ssh
> and can access the Internet.
>
> route gives me
Le 22/07/2014 14:30, B a écrit :
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:04:16 -0700
Paul Scott wrote:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric
RefUse Iface default * 0.0.0.0
U 1002 00 eth0 default 192.168.0.1
0.0.0.0 UG1024
1 - 100 of 965 matches
Mail list logo
