On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:48:53AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 14 feb 11, 18:34:01, Mike McClain wrote:
> > >From this I take it you think ecn should be set to 1?
>
> http://www.frozentux.net/ipsysctl-tutorial/chunkyhtml/tcpvariables.html
Thanks Andrei, I'll take a look.
Mike
--
Satis
On Lu, 14 feb 11, 18:34:01, Mike McClain wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:49:13PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > According to a quick search seems to imply that a firewall or a router
> > along the way is the culprit. If you are lucky it's the router and a
> > firmware upgrade might solve th
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:49:13PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> According to a quick search seems to imply that a firewall or a router
> along the way is the culprit. If you are lucky it's the router and a
> firmware upgrade might solve the problem.
>From this I take it you think ecn should b
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 02:18:37AM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
> To get this done automatically at boot, edit /etc/sysctl.conf and add the
> line:
> net.ipv4.tcp_ecn = 0
Done and thank you,
Mike
--
Satisfied user of Linux since 1997.
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.a
Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> 192.168.10.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.10.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0
> make sure it is using the gateway you think it is.
Which assured me the problem was not
On Sb, 12 feb 11, 23:04:59, Mike McClain wrote:
>
> root@/deb40a:~> echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
> now fetchmail works and I can get urls in firefox
According to a quick search seems to imply that a firewall or a router
along the way is the culprit. If you are lucky it's the router an
In <20110213070459.GA4674@playground>, Mike McClain wrote:
>root@/deb40a:~> echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
>now fetchmail works and I can get urls in firefox
To get this done automatically at boot, edit /etc/sysctl.conf and add the
line:
net.ipv4.tcp_ecn = 0
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:45:39PM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
> At this point, I have two ideas : either a problem with TCP connections
> or specifically with HTTP connections. I would first try to connect to
> other TCP-based services such as SMTP, POP3, FTP... If it fails too,
> then the p
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:16:56 -0800, Mike McClain wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:57:17PM +, Camale?n wrote:
>>
>> Some cable providers (at least in Spain) tweak their cable modems to
>> allow only one computer to browse the web (by means of "filters" that
>> restrict the access to only on
Andrei Popescu a écrit :
> On Vi, 11 feb 11, 19:20:40, Mike McClain wrote:
>> root@/deb40a:~> wget -v google.com
>> --16:28:14-- http://google.com/
>>=> `google.com/index.html'
>> Resolving google.com... 74.125.227.20, 74.125.227.16, 74.125.227.17, ...
>> Connecting to google.com[74.12
On Vi, 11 feb 11, 19:20:40, Mike McClain wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:02:32PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Jo, 10 feb 11, 10:12:30, Mike McClain wrote:
> > > I've done something to keep browsers that connect just fine via ppp
> > > from connecting via eth0.
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > No
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:02:32PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Jo, 10 feb 11, 10:12:30, Mike McClain wrote:
> > I've done something to keep browsers that connect just fine via ppp
> > from connecting via eth0.
> > Thoughts?
>
> No, but maybe the output of 'host google.com' and 'wget google.c
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:57:17PM +, Camale?n wrote:
>
> Some cable providers (at least in Spain) tweak their cable modems to
> allow only one computer to browse the web (by means of "filters" that
> restrict the access to only one MAC address). To avoid this, there are
> routers that can
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:06:07PM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Mike McClain a ?crit :
> >
> > I've done something to keep browsers that connect just fine via ppp
> > from connecting via eth0.
> > Thoughts?
>
> An HTTP proxy setting ?
> That was rather common with dialup connections.
I had to
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:51:48AM +, Chris Davies wrote:
> Mike McClain wrote:
> > I've done something to keep browsers that connect just fine via ppp
> > from connecting via eth0.
>
> File > Work offline (or the equivalent) isn't set, is it?
> Chris
No but thanks for the thought.
Mike
--
Mike McClain wrote:
> I've done something to keep browsers that connect just fine via ppp
> from connecting via eth0.
File > Work offline (or the equivalent) isn't set, is it?
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
Mike McClain a écrit :
>
> I've done something to keep browsers that connect just fine via ppp
> from connecting via eth0.
> Thoughts?
An HTTP proxy setting ?
That was rather common with dialup connections.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
On Jo, 10 feb 11, 10:12:30, Mike McClain wrote:
> I've done something to keep browsers that connect just fine via ppp
> from connecting via eth0.
> Thoughts?
No, but maybe the output of 'host google.com' and 'wget google.com' can
help diagnose.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debi
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:32:42PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mi, 09 feb 11, 15:27:48, Mike McClain wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Here is what I'd do to try troubleshooting this:
> - ping some IP on the internet (8.8.8.8 is one of Google's DNS servers)
> If all this works try 'ping google.com' to
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:21:16AM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Mike McClain a ?crit :
> >
> > I can access the windows box through the router via smbclient.
> > Even with IPtables that are ACCEPT, ACCEPT, ACCEPT, ... neither lynx
> > or Firefox can access the inet though they c
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:27:48 -0800, Mike McClain wrote:
(...)
> Windows has no problem but the Debian box can still only see the net
> via the phone modem and dialup.
(...)
Just an additional note on this.
Some cable providers (at least in Spain) tweak their cable modems to
allow only on
On Mi, 09 feb 11, 15:27:48, Mike McClain wrote:
[snip]
Here is what I'd do to try troubleshooting this:
- ping internal ip of the router (192.168.1.1)
- ping external ip of the router (you find it somewhere in its status
page)
- ping the router's default gateway and its DNS servers (also from
Hello,
Mike McClain a écrit :
>
> I can access the windows box through the router via smbclient.
> Even with IPtables that are ACCEPT, ACCEPT, ACCEPT, ... neither lynx
> or Firefox can access the inet though they can access the router.
Web browers are poor tools when it comes to check IP co
After a decade of dialup So Cal. Cox finally made me an offer
I couldn't refuse. I've switched but can't connect on my Debian box.
I've spent the last two weeks reading man pages, HOWTOs, searching
the web and Deb user list archives but still don't get it.
The setup is like so:
cox cable-
Hi
I am trying to create a pptp tunnel over a vpn (work related), it seems
like the work client checks the route table for any changes :(, thats
cool, I have route table 50 setup for all my extra pppd routing I want,
but, it seems like whenever pppd (or is it pptp) starts talking to an end point
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:26:37AM +0700, Khanh Cao Van wrote:
> I've add many rule on route table but when restart my PC , they're
> gone . How to keep them remain ?
Add them in the /etc/network/interfaces file under the appropriate
device, e.g., eth0. Check the man page for i
I've add many rule on route table but when restart my PC , they're
gone . How to keep them remain ?
--
---
Cao Van Khanh
although it did actually function given
enough time. i noticed that my route table on the debian firewall had
entries of '40' for the MSS, a rather odd number, considering that the
MSS is generally 40 *less* than the MTU (which is 1500 for ethernet).
i hadn't set these explicitly, and
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to flush the route table in debian with the route cmd? I
> know its possible in freeBSD. If not what might be some other
> options? Thank you in advance for your time.
>
Hi there,
If
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to flush the route table in debian with the route cmd? I
> know its possible in freeBSD. If not what might be some other
> options? Thank you in advance for your time.
only way i know how to do it is to restart netwo
Hello,
Is it possible to flush the route table in debian with the route cmd? I
know its possible in freeBSD. If not what might be some other
options? Thank you in advance for your time.
Andrew
> Nick Barron wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> I recently installed a fresh potato box from 2.2r
> I need to add:
> route add -host 255.255.255.255 dev eth1 to my route table to make
> windozs boxes happy w/ dhcp allocation
>
> where can I add this line to execute at boot?
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:32:54AM -0600, ktb wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:17:39PM -0800, Nick Barron wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > I recently installed a fresh potato box from 2.2r
> > I need to add:
> > route add -host 255.255.255.255 dev eth1 to my route
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:17:39PM -0800, Nick Barron wrote:
> hello,
>
> I recently installed a fresh potato box from 2.2r
> I need to add:
> route add -host 255.255.255.255 dev eth1 to my route table to make windozs
> boxes happy w/ dhcp allocation
>
> where can I add
hello,
I recently installed a fresh potato box from
2.2r
I need to add:
route add -host 255.255.255.255 dev eth1 to my
route table to make windozs boxes happy w/ dhcp allocation
where can I add this line to execute at
boot?
using 2.1 w/ 2..0.X I was able to add it to
/etc/init.d
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 11:45:56 -
"Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used to have my debian box conected through a gateway, set up with
>
> route add default gw 192.168.0.1
>
> Now that gateway ceased to exist, and each time I want to connect to
> internet I cant. I have to:
>
Hello Fellow Debin Users !
I used to have my debian box conected through a gateway, set up with
route add default gw 192.168.0.1
Now that gateway ceased to exist, and each time I want to connect to
internet I cant. I have to:
route -n (otherwise it tries to resolve names through
On 09-Apr-2000 00:33:46 Beavis wrote:
> doesn't work!
Did you do
'ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0' ? (before the route add
command)
doesn't work!
- Original Message -
From: HENNEQUIN Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2000 5:16 PM
> In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (message
from
> Beavis on Sat, 08 Apr 2000 17:07:53 -0700)
> Subject: Re: routing table
> References: <[EMAIL P
Robert:
Thanks for the correction, and the RFC pointer. I've got it clearly
bookmarked now, so I won't make the same mistake again.
Marc
--
Marc Mongeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unix Specialist
Ban-Koe Systems
9100 W Bloomington Fwy
Bloomington, MN 55431-2200
(612)888-0123, x417 | FAX: (612)
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999 08:02:43 CST, "Marc Mongeon" writes:
>Jason:
>
>You have nothing else on the ethernet segment that contains the router
>internal interface and the debian eth1 interface, right? First, stop
>paying for 2 IP addresses that you don't need. Assign "internal" IP
>addresses to the r
ED]>
Unix Specialist
Ban-Koe Systems
9100 W Bloomington Fwy
Bloomington, MN 55431-2200
(612)888-0123, x417 | FAX: (612)888-3344
--
"It's such a fine line between clever and stupid."
-- David St. Hubbins and Nigel Tufnel of "Spinal Tap"
>>> "Jason"
Here is the current route table, (output of netstat -nr)
131.107.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0 lo
The reason that it doesn't show the 207.158.140.138 address is because it
x address set as
the gateway in the network config. I can post the ifconfig output and the
current route table if needed. Thanks...
-Jason
David Wright wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 1997, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> > My ISP has just changed my IP number, gateway and DNS server. I have
> > manually changed the routing information in /etc/init.d/network to
> > reflect the new numbers yet when I ping the gateway I get Destination
> > Host Unre
My ISP has just changed my IP number, gateway and DNS server. I have
manually changed the routing information in /etc/init.d/network to
reflect the new numbers yet when I ping the gateway I get Destination
Host Unreachable. the route -n command gives me the following output...
DestinationGatew
46 matches
Mail list logo
