Re: revision updates

2002-01-16 Thread David Z Maze
Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think it was just recently that rev. 5 of 2.2 came out. If I > perform apt-get update and upgrade, does that mean I am at rev. 5? > Or, is there some more complex configuration involved? You might do 'apt-get dist-upgrade' instead of just 'upgrade'.

Re: revision updates

2002-01-16 Thread Jerome Acks Jr
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 06:04:40PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan wrote: > A really stupid question: > > I think it was just recently that rev. 5 of 2.2 came out. If I perform > apt-get update and upgrade, does that mean I am at rev. 5? Or, is there some > more complex configuration involved? > > I am

revision updates

2002-01-16 Thread Curtis Vaughan
A really stupid question: I think it was just recently that rev. 5 of 2.2 came out. If I perform apt-get update and upgrade, does that mean I am at rev. 5? Or, is there some more complex configuration involved? I am apt to think that I am not at 2.2 r5 because when I log in, Linux 2.2.17 is