On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:56, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:18, Dotan Cohen wrote:
sidenote:
this year has had probably the worst participation since I've started
this poll in 2005 :-(
>>>
>>> I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
>>>
>>> Me neither. I didn't participate because there wasn't a web based
>>> app. It's not like there isn't any FOSS web based poll software
>>> available ...
>>
>> Out of interest, why? This seems to me like odd grounds on which to not
>> participate.
>
> I don't post/read this list with e-mail softw
>> I, for one, probably wouldn't have participated if I had to open a web
>> browser. I certainly wouldn't have participated if I had to register.
>
> It would be useful if you can choose both methods (mail and doodle
> like system)
>
They will both be supported, and no, there will be no need to
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:21:00 +, Avi Greenbury in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
> S. Fishpaste wrote:
>> Me neither. I didn't participate because there wasn't a web based
>> app. It's not like there isn't any FOSS web based poll software
>> available ...
>
> Out of interest, why? This seems to
> Hi, are there possibilies to do this survey using a internet-based
> user interface. I think, this might give more up-to-date information.
>
Next year's survey will almost certainly be web-based. I am
collaborating with Tshepang on this. In the meantime, to keep one's
answers off the archived we
S. Fishpaste wrote:
> Me neither. I didn't participate because there wasn't a web based
> app. It's not like there isn't any FOSS web based poll software
> available ...
Out of interest, why? This seems to me like odd grounds on which to not
participate.
--
Avi Greenbury
http://aviswebsite.co.uk
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:15:54 +0100, Javier Barroso in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
> I think that a webapp can do the hard work of recollect all the data
> from people that doesn't dislike webapps and then a poor human can
> translate from email replies to the database and get stats from both.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
> In , Gabor Urban
> wrote:
>>Hi, are there possibilies to do this survey using a internet-based
>>user interface.
>
> It has used email traveling over the Internet since it's inception. That's an
> Internet-based user interface in my
In , Gabor Urban
wrote:
>Hi, are there possibilies to do this survey using a internet-based
>user interface.
It has used email traveling over the Internet since it's inception. That's an
Internet-based user interface in my book.
Is it possible your mean "web-based"? That's still a bad term, s
Hi, are there possibilies to do this survey using a internet-based
user interface. I think, this might give more up-to-date information.
--
Linux: Choice of a GNU Generation
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
> Isn't it a good thing? I think it is amazingly good. Take a look at all
> those questions asked in the Ubuntu forum, >90% are tasteless. What's
> worse, (have you flipped down several index pages?), the questions on the
> 4th or 5th pages are just asked hours ago! I think the "huge success" of
>
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:51:31 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>>> my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth of
>>> traffic it has had before. But that's a cursory observation at best.
>>
>> This seem to back that up.
>>
>> http://lists.debian.org/stats/debian-user.png
>
> T
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:01:53 -0500
Tim Tebbit wrote:
> Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >
> > My guess would be the popularity of Ubuntu. Much of the pie went
> > there. As Ubuntu is Debian-derived, how about doing the poll there as
> > well?
> >
>
> Out of curiosity I extracted unique email address from
Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
> My guess would be the popularity of Ubuntu. Much of the pie went
> there. As Ubuntu is Debian-derived, how about doing the poll there as
> well?
>
Out of curiosity I extracted unique email address from ubuntu-users.mbox
available from their archive site. The archive starts
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:01:20 +0200
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >> Would you like me to do it? I am rather active on the Ubuntu and
> >> Kubuntu lists. I have no problem taking responsibility for those
> >> lists every year, and you keep up the good work with Debian. What
> >> do you say?
> >
> > magnifi
>> Would you like me to do it? I am rather active on the Ubuntu and
>> Kubuntu lists. I have no problem taking responsibility for those lists
>> every year, and you keep up the good work with Debian. What do you
>> say?
>
> magnificent! when u going to start it? I'm going to re-subscribe right
> no
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:25, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> I actually once did, but am sure I'll be swamped if I try now - Ubuntu
>> is massive! It would be nice though to compare the response
>> (favourites) from both camps. I'll limit myself to Debian for now;
>> maybe next year :-(
>>
>
> Would you li
> I actually once did, but am sure I'll be swamped if I try now - Ubuntu
> is massive! It would be nice though to compare the response
> (favourites) from both camps. I'll limit myself to Debian for now;
> maybe next year :-(
>
Would you like me to do it? I am rather active on the Ubuntu and
Kubun
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:18, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>>> sidenote:
>>> this year has had probably the worst participation since I've started
>>> this poll in 2005 :-(
>>
>> I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
>>
>> my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth o
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 03:31, Tim Tebbit wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
>>
>> I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
>>
>> my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth of
>> traffic it has had before. But that's a cursory observation at best.
>
> This
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 20:31 -0500, Tim Tebbit wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> >
> > I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
> >
> > my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth of
> > traffic it has had before. But that's a cursory observation at b
>> sidenote:
>> this year has had probably the worst participation since I've started
>> this poll in 2005 :-(
>
> I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
>
> my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth of
> traffic it has had before. But that's a cursory obser
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:31:47PM -0500, Tim Tebbit wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> >
> > I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
> >
> > my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth of
> > traffic it has had before. But that's a cursory observati
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
>
> my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth of
> traffic it has had before. But that's a cursory observation at best.
This seem to back that up.
http://lists.debian.org/stats/de
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:07:21PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following is the results of a poll that has been running for over a
> week, one which questions readers of debian-user to list their
> favourite FLOSS -> Free (Libre) or Open Source Software.
[...]
>
> sidenote:
> thi
Hi,
Following is the results of a poll that has been running for over a
week, one which questions readers of debian-user to list their
favourite FLOSS -> Free (Libre) or Open Source Software.
There's the usual stars in the form of Firefox/Iceweasel, GIMP,
aptitude, and OpenOffice.org's word proce
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Raj Kiran Grandhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> What does "x9" mean? To an American reader, it means "multiply by 9", and
>> that doesn't seem to make sense.
>>
>
> I guess it is the number of votes received for that application.
Sorry, for I t
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 12/01/08 02:36, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
Following is the results of a poll that has been running for about 2
weeks, one which questions readers of debian-user to list their
favourite FLOSS -> Free (Libre) or Open Source Software.
There's the usual stars in the for
On 12/01/08 02:36, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
Following is the results of a poll that has been running for about 2
weeks, one which questions readers of debian-user to list their
favourite FLOSS -> Free (Libre) or Open Source Software.
There's the usual stars in the form of Firefox/Iceweas
Hi,
Following is the results of a poll that has been running for about 2
weeks, one which questions readers of debian-user to list their
favourite FLOSS -> Free (Libre) or Open Source Software.
There's the usual stars in the form of Firefox/Iceweasel and GIMP, as
well as aptitude, and great growt
On Dec 3, 2007 12:57 AM, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 19:36:08 +0200
> "Tshepang Lekhonkhobe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Tomboy. The most favourite non-free piece remains Adobe Acrobat, and
> > one wonders when Evince and other free equivalents will catch
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 05:20:51PM -0500, Christopher Judd wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 December 2007 13:06:36 Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>
> >...
>
> >
> > How sad.
> > ...
>
> >
> > If you can only have one woodworking tool, make it a combination stone.
> > Then you can make every other tool eventually
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 13:06:36 Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>...
>
> How sad.
> ...
>
> If you can only have one woodworking tool, make it a combination stone.
> Then you can make every other tool eventually. To make life easier, if
> you can only have one tool, make it a vertical milling mach
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:06:36PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:25:46AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:45:07AM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:59:52AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> > > For
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:59:52AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > Firefox/Iceweasel and GIMP reign supreme for the third year running
> > but are now joined by aptitude, each having 21 votes.
>
> thy are category killing apps. Intersting is the number of cli web
> browsers populating th
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:25:46AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:45:07AM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:59:52AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > For pure woodworking (as opposed to, say, surface prep prior to
> > repainting
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:45:07AM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:59:52AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> > Interesting. I view it more like this: sudo and grep (find, sort, etc
> > etc etc) are ubiquitous. I'm surprised they made the list at all. I
> > consid
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:59:52AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> Interesting. I view it more like this: sudo and grep (find, sort, etc
> etc etc) are ubiquitous. I'm surprised they made the list at all. I
> consider it equivalent to asking woodworkers what their favorite tool
> is and bei
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:36:08PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi debian-user,
>
> Here is a summary of the mini-poll that I conducted recently on Debian-user:
Very interesting results, and thanks for doing this.
>
> Firefox/Iceweasel and GIMP reign supreme for the third year running
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 19:36:08 +0200
"Tshepang Lekhonkhobe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Tomboy. The most favourite non-free piece remains Adobe Acrobat, and
> one wonders when Evince and other free equivalents will catch up.
http://www.linux.com/feature/122195
http://gnupdf.org/
We can hop
Hi debian-user,
Here is a summary of the mini-poll that I conducted recently on Debian-user:
Firefox/Iceweasel and GIMP reign supreme for the third year running
but are now joined by aptitude, each having 21 votes. I was surprised
by Quod Libet receiving one vote but more surprising was F-Spot wh
Hi debian-user,
Here is a summary of the mini-poll that I conducted recently on Debian-user:
Firefox and GIMP reign as per my expecations, just like they did last
year. I was however surprised that there weren't any Krita, Mono,
Beagle, Tomboy, or Banshee fans, with users sticking to Vim, xpdf,
42 matches
Mail list logo
