On Thursday 01 February 2007 10:57, Pim Bliek wrote:
> Hmm, so that means I am stuck... The system was installed from a
> (modified for 3Ware card + LVM support) Sarge install CD which means
> 1.37 for e2fsprogs (I checked). So this means the -O option wasn't
> used...
>
> Damn.. this will mean I
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:54:14AM +0100, Pim Bliek wrote:
> # mke2fs /dev/vg00/backups -O resize_inode
> # tune2fs -j /dev/vg00/backups
> # lvextend -L 65G /dev/vg00/backups
> # resize2fs /dev/vg00/backups 65G
> resize2fs 1.40-WIP (14-Nov-2006)
> Resizing the filesystem on /dev/vg00/backups to 170
# mke2fs /dev/vg00/backups -O resize_inode
# tune2fs -j /dev/vg00/backups
# lvextend -L 65G /dev/vg00/backups
# resize2fs /dev/vg00/backups 65G
resize2fs 1.40-WIP (14-Nov-2006)
Resizing the filesystem on /dev/vg00/backups to 17039360 (4k) blocks.
The filesystem on /dev/vg00/backups is now 17039360
# ext2online -v /dev/vg00/backup 60G
ext2online v1.1.19 - 2001/03/18 for EXT2FS 0.5b
new filesystem size 15728640
using 0 reserved group descriptor blocks
ext2online: ext2_ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for device
ext2online: unable to resize /dev/mapper/vg00-backup
So ext2online doesn't work eithe
Le mardi 30 janvier 2007 22:21, Pim Bliek a écrit :
> Hi
>
> Since a couple of months I am running Etch on a new production server,
> with the following specs:
>
> - kernel 2.6.18-smp package
> - lvm 2.02.06-3
> - RAID5 on a 3Ware card (3w_9xxx)
>
> I want to grow my /var filesystem ONLINE. I can f
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:57:23AM +0100, Pim Bliek wrote:
> I said this after Pim said that...
> at some point Pim said:
> ># resize2fs -f /dev/vg00/vartest
> >> resize2fs 1.40-WIP (14-Nov-2006)
> >> Filesystem at /dev/vg00/vartest is mounted on /vartest; on-line
> >> resizing required
> >> ol
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:57:23AM +0100, Pim Bliek wrote:
> Hmm, so that means I am stuck... The system was installed from a (modified
> for 3Ware card + LVM support) Sarge install CD which means 1.37 for
> e2fsprogs (I checked). So this means the -O option wasn't used...
>
> Damn.. this will mea
Hmm, so that means I am stuck... The system was installed from a (modified
for 3Ware card + LVM support) Sarge install CD which means 1.37 for
e2fsprogs (I checked). So this means the -O option wasn't used...
Damn.. this will mean I will have to recreate all filesystems on the box...
That's going
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:35:22PM -0500, Drake Mobius wrote:
> of course, only use XFS with a very reliable and stable OS and power supply.
> Being non-journalled, and all.
>
Hmm. Researching what you are talking about might be a good thing.
"XFS is a high-performance journaling file system cre
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 15:35 -0500, Drake Mobius wrote:
> of course, only use XFS with a very reliable and stable OS and power
> supply. Being non-journalled, and all.
WHAT? Stop spreading lies.
XFS is and always has been Journalled.
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-fs9.html
In
of course, only use XFS with a very reliable and stable OS and power supply.
Being non-journalled, and all.
On 1/30/07, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:21:59PM +0100, Pim Bliek wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since a couple of months I am running Etch on a new productio
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 06:07:47PM +0100, Pim Bliek wrote:
> Just tried the -f option on a test partition. Doesn't do the trick. Same
> error:
>
> # resize2fs -f /dev/vg00/vartest
> resize2fs 1.40-WIP (14-Nov-2006)
> Filesystem at /dev/vg00/vartest is mounted on /vartest; on-line
> resizing requi
Just tried the -f option on a test partition. Doesn't do the trick. Same error:
# resize2fs -f /dev/vg00/vartest
resize2fs 1.40-WIP (14-Nov-2006)
Filesystem at /dev/vg00/vartest is mounted on /vartest; on-line
resizing required
old desc_blocks = 1, new_desc_blocks = 1
resize2fs: Kernel does not s
Ehm thanx for all the comments guys. I appreciate it, but I am not
willing nor in the situation to migrate to another fs format. Also,
somehow these kind of questions always seem to start a discussion on
'what fs is best'... as boring as a vi vs. emacs discussion (it is vi,
so quit whining :P).
A
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:43:25PM +0200, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
> On Tue 30 Jan 2007, Pim Bliek wrote:
>
> > So... what is the trick to make this work? I cannot find it.
>
> The trick, though it may not be of much help to you now, is to use ReiserFS
> instead...
>
> I've been using this feat
On Tue 30 Jan 2007, Pim Bliek wrote:
> So... what is the trick to make this work? I cannot find it.
The trick, though it may not be of much help to you now, is to use ReiserFS
instead...
I've been using this feature of ReiserFS for years and it has never failed.
Ray
--
You cannot discover n
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:21:59PM +0100, Pim Bliek wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since a couple of months I am running Etch on a new production server,
> with the following specs:
>
> - kernel 2.6.18-smp package
> - lvm 2.02.06-3
> - RAID5 on a 3Ware card (3w_9xxx)
>
> I want to grow my /var filesystem ONLIN
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:21:59PM +0100, Pim Bliek wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since a couple of months I am running Etch on a new production server,
> with the following specs:
>
> - kernel 2.6.18-smp package
> - lvm 2.02.06-3
> - RAID5 on a 3Ware card (3w_9xxx)
>
> I want to grow my /var filesystem ONLIN
Hi
Since a couple of months I am running Etch on a new production server,
with the following specs:
- kernel 2.6.18-smp package
- lvm 2.02.06-3
- RAID5 on a 3Ware card (3w_9xxx)
I want to grow my /var filesystem ONLINE. I can find tons of docs on
offline resizing, but I am not in the position t
19 matches
Mail list logo
