Hi,
> > Where does this come from? reprepro is version 5.4.6+really5.3.2-1. Did
> > somebody tried to turn back the clock? How can I recover from this?
> >
> PS: Seems this came up with the reprepro "upgrade" 2 days ago:
>
> reprepro:amd64 (5.4.6-3, 5.4.6+really5.3.2-1)
Please see https://
Hi,
> > Please see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100640
> >
> > Summary is: use reprepro from experimental.
> >
>
> This report is from me. The "duplicate sort" message is gone, but reprepro
> version 5.4.7-1 is still buggy.
Sorry for not being clear. I was it by the same e
Hi Alex,
Alexandre Rossi wrote:
Please see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100640
Summary is: use reprepro from experimental.
This report is from me. The "duplicate sort" message is gone, but reprepro
version 5.4.7-1 is still buggy.
Regards
Harri
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Where does this come from? reprepro is version 5.4.6+really5.3.2-1. Did
somebody tried to turn back the clock? How can I recover from this?
PS: Seems this came up with the reprepro "upgrade" 2 days ago:
reprepro:amd64 (5.4.6-3, 5.4.6+really5.3.2-1)
Regards
Harri
Hi folks,
Trying to add or remove a source package in my local sid repository
reprepro returns
% reprepro removesrc sid iproute2
BDB1015 references: duplicate sort specified but not supported in database
db_open(/var/www/debian/db/references.db:references)[22]: Invalid argument
There have been e
5 matches
Mail list logo