On Saturday 08 December 2001 03:40, Alec wrote:
> On Friday 07 December 2001 02:05 pm, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > The following procmail recipe can keep your inbox clear of it:
> > :0
> >
> > * ^X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > /dev/null
> >
> >
> > Craig
>
> Craig, can't you do it on the ser
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 02:40:59PM -0500, Alec wrote:
| On Friday 07 December 2001 02:05 pm, Craig Dickson wrote:
|
| > The following procmail recipe can keep your inbox clear of it:
| > :0
| >
| > * ^X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > /dev/null
|
| Craig, can't you do it on the server side
Alec wrote:
> Craig, can't you do it on the server side?
If you're the list admin, sure. I'm not.
Craig
On Friday 07 December 2001 02:05 pm, Craig Dickson wrote:
> The following procmail recipe can keep your inbox clear of it:
> :0
>
> * ^X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> /dev/null
>
>
> Craig
Craig, can't you do it on the server side?
Alec
___
ben wrote:
> so far today (10am pacific time), i've received about 50 reposts from
> yesterdays mail on this list. it's not coming from anywhere else, so it's not
> my pop connection. what's going on with the list server?
Nothing's wrong with the list server. Some idiot at mail2.secnoc.de
is ec
so far today (10am pacific time), i've received about 50 reposts from
yesterdays mail on this list. it's not coming from anywhere else, so it's not
my pop connection. what's going on with the list server?
6 matches
Mail list logo