Re: Reply to list (was Re: [Somewhat More OT] Closed source software Was [Re: Hmmm. A question.)

2008-04-07 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:04:51AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 02:54:26PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > [..] > Regarding: > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > > yeah, it's tough. It was also a simply avoided mistake. We all make > > simple mist

Reply to list (was Re: [Somewhat More OT] Closed source software Was [Re: Hmmm. A question.)

2008-04-07 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 02:54:26PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: [..] Regarding: > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > yeah, it's tough. It was also a simply avoided mistake. We all make > simple mistakes. One that is so simply avoidable should be, IMO. but > it's only that, my

Re: reply to list was Re:[Somewhat More OT] Closed source software

2008-04-05 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Saturday 05 April 2008, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > Mark Allums wrote: > > It's not my mailer, it's me (I use Thunderbird/Mozilla/Icedove), > > and I have to apologize for it. > > Please be considerate to others and use an email client that is aware > of reply-to-list feature. From > http://w

Re: reply to list was Re:[Somewhat More OT] Closed source software

2008-04-05 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Mark Allums wrote: > > It's not my mailer, it's me (I use Thunderbird/Mozilla/Icedove), and I > have to apologize for it. Please be considerate to others and use an email client that is aware of reply-to-list feature. From http://wiki.debian.org/ReplyToListEmailClients there are many email clie