From: joel.r...@gmail.com
> And Now Google Doesn't Think Users Should Ever Set Headers.
> Progress is progress.
Yeah.
Progress is progress.
ahem. Sorry. I guess I forgot something.
{irony}Progress is progress.{end-irony}
--
Joel Rees
If you live in a cave this may actually have some meaning amo
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Fungi4All wrote:
> UTC Time: June 10, 2017 2:13 AM
>
> From: joel.r...@gmail.com
>
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
>> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
>>> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people
UTC Time: June 10, 2017 2:13 AM
From: joel.r...@gmail.com
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
>> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are
>> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect.
>
> Not
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
>> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are
>> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect.
>
> Not if the list is properly configured.
>
> Debian's lists are
What configuration would avoid this result, when using "Reply to All"?
When using "Reply", a mailing-list configuration which sets Reply-To to
point back to the list (presumably in addition to any Reply-To set by
the user, or only when the user did not set such) would avoid that
Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are
> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect.
Not if the list is properly configured.
Debian's lists are badly configured, it results in burden to all users,
but the users
On Friday 09 June 2017 10:47:29 Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit :
> > When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to
> > All", since that sends individual emails to the person you are
> > answer
UTC Time: June 9, 2017 2:47 PM
From: geo...@nsup.org
To: Charlie Kravetz
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit :
> When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to
> All", since that sends individual emails to th
On 2017-06-09 at 10:47, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit :
>
>> When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to
>> All", since that sends individual emails to the person you are
>> answ
Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit :
> When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to
> All", since that sends individual emails to the person you are
> answering.
This recommendation is unsustainable and should be eliminated from the
I have a message with the header (with domain name hidden):
From:
Geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
michael bane
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and I would expect "Reply to a
t doesn't seem to be set at all (as intended).
Anything else in my headers that makes some MUAs drop the list address
unexpectedly? Thanks for any tips :)
Me too :(
Just use 'reply to all' - although this is slight overkill because the
original poster then gets 2 copies.
I thin
seem to be set at all (as intended).
Anything else in my headers that makes some MUAs drop the list address
unexpectedly? Thanks for any tips :)
Me too :(
Just use 'reply to all' - although this is slight overkill because the
original poster then gets 2 copies.
I think it is something i
13 matches
Mail list logo
