Re: replacing a NIC

2005-06-17 Thread Dave Ewart
On Thursday, 16.06.2005 at 16:21 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We had a 3com NIC go bad and replaced it with and Intel card. > > > > I'm noticing odd behavior. The kernel/NIC runs a self-test and says > > that it's up in 100 Full Duplex mode. [ This is good. ] I try to > > pi

Re: replacing a NIC

2005-06-16 Thread Jacob S
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:33:10 -0700 Marc Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > We had a 3com NIC go bad and replaced it with and Intel card. > > I'm noticing odd behavior. The kernel/NIC runs a self-test and > says that it's up in 100 Full Duplex mode. [ This is good. ] > I try to

Re: replacing a NIC

2005-06-16 Thread Paul E Condon
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:33:10PM -0700, Marc Jackson wrote: > Hello, > > We had a 3com NIC go bad and replaced it with and Intel card. > > I'm noticing odd behavior. The kernel/NIC runs a self-test and > says that it's up in 100 Full Duplex mode. [ This is good. ] > I try to ping some site

replacing a NIC

2005-06-16 Thread Marc Jackson
Hello, We had a 3com NIC go bad and replaced it with and Intel card. I'm noticing odd behavior. The kernel/NIC runs a self-test and says that it's up in 100 Full Duplex mode. [ This is good. ] I try to ping some sites to verify and I get 100% packet loss. I did ping to the broadcast address