Re: reading MS word files

2006-11-02 Thread Carl Fink
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 10:15:47AM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > I get angry every time, I have to explain to someone that it is not true > that the computer is at risk, because of the unavailability of virus > updates as long as the computer is not connected to any network (the > reason

Re: reading MS word files

2006-11-02 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
what extra work there is for them, but I understand that the windows recipients have to do extra work if its not a .doc file. The sender tells me its more work to send .doc to everyone else and something else to me. Obviously, this is a training problem, or a social problem and not a technical

Re: reading MS word files

2006-11-01 Thread Carl Fink
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:31:56PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Nov 01 10:59 -0600]: > > Notes' behavior can also be changed, but as you say, almost no one does. > > By the user or does an administrator have to do it globally? I don't > find its interface v

Re: reading MS word files

2006-11-01 Thread Nate Bargmann
* Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Nov 01 10:59 -0600]: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 06:07:50PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Off topic: How does Lotus Notes fiercely force its users to top post? > > > > I don't know Lotus Notes, so tha

Re: reading MS word files

2006-11-01 Thread Carl Fink
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 06:07:50PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Off topic: How does Lotus Notes fiercely force its users to top post? > > > I don't know Lotus Notes, so that's a not a rhetorical question. [snip] > MS Outlook's default behavi

Re: reading MS word files

2006-11-01 Thread Andrei Popescu
Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Off topic: How does Lotus Notes fiercely force its users to top post? > > I don't know Lotus Notes, so that's a not a rhetorical question. > > Any time one selects Reply With History (essentially including the > message you're replying to), it includ

Re: reading MS word files

2006-11-01 Thread David Jardine
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 06:37:45AM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * David Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Nov 01 03:52 -0600]: > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:30:31PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > > [...] > > > If they have the misfortune to use an MUA that fiercely forces its > > > users to to

Re: reading MS word files

2006-11-01 Thread Nate Bargmann
* David Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Nov 01 03:52 -0600]: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:30:31PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > * Gnu_Raiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Oct 31 17:32 -0600]: > > > > > I kind of see this as the same type of thing as top posting, no matter > > > how > > > many time

Re: reading MS word files

2006-11-01 Thread David Jardine
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:30:31PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * Gnu_Raiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Oct 31 17:32 -0600]: > > > I kind of see this as the same type of thing as top posting, no matter how > > many times you tell them, or post links to why its bad they still do it. > > After about

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread Nate Bargmann
* Gnu_Raiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Oct 31 17:32 -0600]: > I kind of see this as the same type of thing as top posting, no matter how > many times you tell them, or post links to why its bad they still do it. > After about five e-mail returns they complain that my e-mails are hard to > read an

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread Gnu_Raiz
>From: Ken Irving <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >and these in /etc/mailcap: >application/msword; wvMime '%s'; description=Microsoft Word Document; >test=test -n "$DISPLAY" >application/msword; wvText '%s' /dev/stdout; description=Microsoft Word >Document; copiousoutput >application/msword; wordview '%s';

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread Nyizsnyik Ferenc
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 11:11 -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:40:55PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote: > > > >> However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking > > > >> that its the only format around, what works? I need not just the text > > > >> but collum

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread Carl Fink
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:15:55PM +0100, Sjoerd Hiemstra wrote: > I took Word Viewer 2003 from the MS site ("View, print and copy Word > documents, even if you don't have Word installed") and tried to install > it with the version of Wine that is available for Sarge. > Error: "Newer version of Wi

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread Ken Irving
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:13:02PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * Douglas Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Oct 31 10:14 -0600]: > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:40:55PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote: > > > > >> However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me > > > > >> thinking > > > > >>

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread Sjoerd Hiemstra
Douglas Tutty: > to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking that > its the only format around, what works? I need not just the text but > collumns, tables, images, the works. I took Word Viewer 2003 from the MS site ("View, print and copy Word documents, even if you don't have

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread Nate Bargmann
* Douglas Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Oct 31 10:14 -0600]: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:40:55PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote: > > > >> However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking > > > >> that its the only format around, what works? I need not just the text > > > >> but

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/31/06 10:03, steef wrote: > Douglas Tutty wrote: > Douglas Tutty wrote: > [snip] >> How good is Lyx at reading/viewing MS word files, including all >> formatting and images? >> > shouldn't know. never used it: but, i am inte

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:27:20 -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote: > > >>Douglas Tutty wrote: > > >> > > >>>I understand that to __edit__ MS word files, the only fully functional > > >>>option is OpenOffice. > > >>> > > >>>However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking > > >>

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread Douglas Tutty
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:40:55PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote: > > >> However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking > > >> that its the only format around, what works? I need not just the text > > >> but collumns, tables, images, the works. > > Who sends you doc files? Ask

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread steef
Florian Kulzer wrote: On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:27:20 -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote: Douglas Tutty wrote: I understand that to __edit__ MS word files, the only fully functional option is OpenOffice. However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking that it

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread steef
Douglas Tutty wrote: Douglas Tutty wrote: I understand that to __edit__ MS word files, the only fully functional option is OpenOffice. However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking that its the only format around, what works? I need not just the text but

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread ss11223
On Oct 30, 6:50 pm, Douglas Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I understand that to __edit__ MS word files, the only fully functional > option is OpenOffice. > > However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking > that its the only format around, what works? I need not just

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread steef
Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/31/06 05:07, steef wrote: Douglas Tutty wrote: I understand that to __edit__ MS word files, the only fully functional option is OpenOffice. However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking th

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread Zoran Kolic
> >> However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking > >> that its the only format around, what works? I need not just the text > >> but collumns, tables, images, the works. MS word, I think. :-) Going other way, you could find catdoc a nice solution. Stand- alone or in

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread Douglas Tutty
> >>Douglas Tutty wrote: > >> > >>>I understand that to __edit__ MS word files, the only fully functional > >>>option is OpenOffice. > >>> > >>>However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking > >>>that its the only format around, what works? I need not just the text > >

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/31/06 05:07, steef wrote: > Douglas Tutty wrote: >> I understand that to __edit__ MS word files, the only fully functional >> option is OpenOffice. >> >> However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking >> that its the only

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-31 Thread steef
Douglas Tutty wrote: I understand that to __edit__ MS word files, the only fully functional option is OpenOffice. However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking that its the only format around, what works? I need not just the text but collumns, tables, images, the works

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-30 Thread Russell L. Harris
Douglas Tutty wrote: On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:43:29PM -0600, Russell L. Harris wrote: However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking that its the only format around, what works? I need not just the text but collumns, tables, images, the works. Is there a way to conve

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-30 Thread Douglas Tutty
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:43:29PM -0600, Russell L. Harris wrote: > >However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking > >that its the only format around, what works? I need not just the text > >but collumns, tables, images, the works. > > > >Is there a way to convert them t

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-30 Thread Russell L. Harris
Douglas Tutty wrote: I understand that to __edit__ MS word files, the only fully functional option is OpenOffice. However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking that its the only format around, what works? I need not just the text but collumns, tables, images, the works

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-30 Thread Douglas Tutty
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 05:52:39PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/30/06 12:51, Douglas Tutty wrote: > > I understand that to __edit__ MS word files, the only fully functional > > option is OpenOffice. > > > > However, to just read properly .d

Re: reading MS word files

2006-10-30 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/30/06 12:51, Douglas Tutty wrote: > I understand that to __edit__ MS word files, the only fully functional > option is OpenOffice. > > However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking > that its the only format around, wha

reading MS word files

2006-10-30 Thread Douglas Tutty
I understand that to __edit__ MS word files, the only fully functional option is OpenOffice. However, to just read properly .doc files that people email me thinking that its the only format around, what works? I need not just the text but collumns, tables, images, the works. Is there a way to co