Re: re-attaching a terminal to a disconnected process

1997-09-17 Thread Frank Sergeant
Thanks (to Thomas and Greg) for the suggestions to use screen. I'll look into it. I wrote: > Is there a way to tell the process to keep running even if > its terminal is disconnected, and then later re-attach a > terminal to it, [...] -- Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THI

Re: re-attaching a terminal to a disconnected process

1997-09-16 Thread Thomas Baetzler
Frank Sergeant wrote: :I'm thinking about a setup like this: our application would :run on a Linux box at the central office, one instance (process) :for each user. [...] :What happens to the remote user's process on the central Linux :box if the connection between the remote machine and :the cent

Re: re-attaching a terminal to a disconnected process

1997-09-15 Thread Gergely Madarasz
On Mon, 15 Sep 1997, Frank Sergeant wrote: > Is there a way to tell the process to keep running even if > its terminal is disconnected, and then later re-attach a > terminal to it, perhaps the same terminal from the remote > office or perhaps the system administrator's terminal at > the central of

re-attaching a terminal to a disconnected process

1997-09-15 Thread Frank Sergeant
I'm thinking about a setup like this: our application would run on a Linux box at the central office, one instance (process) for each user. Some users would be connected over the central office's ethernet. Other users would be at remote offices connected perhaps directly over a modem to the centr