On 10/07/2017 06:48 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Fred wrote:
I have a Sun Ultra 5 that needs to continue running Wheezy for a
while. I tried to apt-update but binary_sparc is no longer at
http://security.debian.org/dists/wheezy/updates/Release. What do I
need to change the sources list to?
Debian
Fred wrote:
> I have a Sun Ultra 5 that needs to continue running Wheezy for a
> while. I tried to apt-update but binary_sparc is no longer at
> http://security.debian.org/dists/wheezy/updates/Release. What do I
> need to change the sources list to?
Debian Wheezy LTS is only available for i386
On Mi, 18 iul 12, 01:35:25, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Is there a way to find all the Debian packages that depend upon libslang2?
> Like I know that mc and slnr do, but how does one find them all?
aptitude search ~Rlibslang2
or
aptitude search ?reverse-depends(libslang2)
Kind regards,
And
On 2012-07-18, John Hasler wrote:
> apt-cache rdepends libslang2
Thanks John.
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ju587m$c2p$2...@dough.gmane.org
On 2012-07-18, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> Is there a way to find all the Debian packages that depend upon libslang2?
>> Like I know that mc and slnr do, but how does one find them
apt-cache rdepends libslang2
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r4s9n7jw@thumper.dhh.gt.org
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Is there a way to find all the Debian packages that depend upon libslang2?
> Like I know that mc and slnr do, but how does one find them all?
man apt-cache shows:
rdepends pkg...
rdepends shows a listing of each reverse dependency a package has.
And r
On 2012-07-18, ew wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2012, at 9:35 PM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to find all the Debian packages that depend upon libslang2?
>> Like I know that mc and slnr do, but how does one find them all?
>>
>> Hugo
>
> I'm not sure of the most elegant way.
>
> In the comm
On Jul 17, 2012, at 9:35 PM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Is there a way to find all the Debian packages that depend upon libslang2?
> Like I know that mc and slnr do, but how does one find them all?
>
> Hugo
I'm not sure of the most elegant way.
In the command line I'll use -s for simulate the in
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:15:06PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:18:00AM -0400, Robert Wolfe (Debian) wrote:
>
> .snip...
> >
> > Viden, I _believe_ that you can still use RPM with Debian as well,
> > as long as you use alien to convert the pa
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:18:00AM -0400, Robert Wolfe (Debian) wrote:
.snip...
>
> Viden, I _believe_ that you can still use RPM with Debian as well,
> as long as you use alien to convert the packages between RPM and
> DEB. Also, if you want to build your own packages o
Robert Wolfe writes:
> I _believe_ that you can still use RPM with Debian as well, as long as
> you use alien to convert the packages between RPM and DEB.
Be _very_ careful with Alien.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
On 5/11/2011 4:03 AM, Widen-Damian Ivanov wrote:
Hi all,
I'm planning to install Linux on a mid-amount of computers (for now 30-40) and I'm searching for the right distribution. As I would like to package also some stuff for internal use, so I tried to with fedora and with ubuntu and debian testi
On 05/11/2011 10:03 AM, Widen-Damian Ivanov wrote:
Hi all,
I'm planning to install Linux on a mid-amount of computers (for now 30-40) and I'm searching for the right distribution. As I would like to package also some stuff for internal use, so I tried to with fedora and with ubuntu and debian tes
> From: Rogelio [mailto:scubac...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 1:49 AM
> Subject: Debian packages for cool open source collaboration tools?
>
> I'm looking for open source collaboration and project management
tools,
> preferably already packaged in deb or apt-get.
>
> Ideally, I'd
martin f krafft wrote:
Please consider starting a Wiki page where you document your
findings on http://wiki.debian.org/Software, e.g. at
http://wiki.debian.org/Collaboration
Yeah, will certainly do so.
Right now, I'm using Project Pier in lieu of BaseCamp/ActiveCollab, and
I'm liking it a lot
also sprach Rogelio [2009.03.10.0749 +0100]:
> I'm looking for open source collaboration and project management
> tools, preferably already packaged in deb or apt-get.
>
> Ideally, I'd like to build my own internal resources like Google
> Docs, Meeting Wizard, Etherpad, etc. I'd like the idea o
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 22:26:24 +0200, markus reichelt wrote:
> * Richard A Nelson wrote:
>
> > Is this what you want:
>
> Not really, I'm only looking for a link (to replace the old hinterhof
> URL in some guide)
The homepage of the Debian Loop-AES Team is here:
http://alioth.debian.org/proje
* Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this what you want:
Not really, I'm only looking for a link (to replace the old hinterhof
URL in some guide)
I'm happily using Slackware btw :)
--
left blank, right bald
pgpEslwTmtC1p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, markus reichelt wrote:
http://hinterhof.net/debian/ doesn't list loop-aes packages (among
other stuff) anymore, for quite some time now.
Is there a new maintainer? Where are the packages?
Is this what you want:
apt-cache show loop-aes-source
--
Rick Nelson
no... I musn
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 20:02:43 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
> > Florian Kulzer writes:
>
> [...]
>
> [ We are discussing about verifying the content of Debian DVDs. ]
>
> > > First you need to download the files which list these checksums:
> > >
> >
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 20:02:43 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
> Florian Kulzer writes:
[...]
[ We are discussing about verifying the content of Debian DVDs. ]
> > First you need to download the files which list these checksums:
> >
> > wget
> > http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r1/i386/i
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ Felix, I hope this message also helps with your problem. ]
>
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 16:22:06 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
> > Florian Kulzer writes:
> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 21:02:41 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > > Did you try to remove
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 04:22:06PM -0700, Carl Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > I haven't seen any place where aptitude shows any of that
> > information. It just shows me a warning such as:
> >
> > WARNING: This version of acpid
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:40:44 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> [ Felix, I hope this message also helps with your problem. ]
Thank you.
The posting gave a full explanation of my observations and a strategy
for dealing with the (probably non-existent) problem.
Felix
--
Felix Karpfen
Public Key 7
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 04:22:06PM -0700, Carl Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> I haven't seen any place where aptitude shows any of that
> information. It just shows me a warning such as:
>
> WARNING: This version of acpid is from an untrusted source!
>Installing th
[ Felix, I hope this message also helps with your problem. ]
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 16:22:06 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
> Florian Kulzer writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 21:02:41 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
> >
> > Did you try to remove all the DVD-related lines from your
> > /etc/apt/sources.
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 21:02:41 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
>
> Did you try to remove all the DVD-related lines from your
> /etc/apt/sources.list, run "aptitude update" and then add the DVD(s)
> again using the "apt-cdrom" command? I think that should
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:55:17 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 21:02:41 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
>> Is there some way to get the system to re-read the release file? I
>> installed the key after I upgradeed the system to etch, so all
>> packages on my DVDs show as being un
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:02:41PM -0700, Carl Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > dpkg performs no key checking, at least on packages in the Debian
> > > archive. There was some exper
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:02:41PM -0700, Carl Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > dpkg performs no key checking, at least on packages in the Debian
> > archive. There was some experimental code to stick embedded signatures
> > into .de
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 21:02:41 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
> Daniel Burrows writes:
[...]
> > It shouldn't matter which frontend you use. All the major frontends
> > check the signature of the Release file when you download package lists
> > from the archive. The Release file contains a cryp
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 05:37:51AM +, Felix Karpfen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > >> But How do you use the key(s) listed in "/etc/apt/trusted.gpg" to
> > >> authenticate the individual installed packages.
> > >
> > > Oh, dpkg autom
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 05:37:51AM +, Felix Karpfen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> >> But How do you use the key(s) listed in "/etc/apt/trusted.gpg" to
> >> authenticate the individual installed packages.
> >
> > Oh, dpkg automatically checks it for you when you use apt-get/aptitude
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:32:20 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
(Edited)
>
> During etch in testing period, I recall several problems which
> errouneously made to report to be unsigned package.
Since gpg-signed packages is an "etch" innovation, it explains why I
had not encountered before the "warning" de
Hi,
First, missing md5sum values reported by debsums are normal.
Second, signed key feature is nice security feature but it was a new
feature. During etch in testing period, I recall several problems which
errouneously made to report to be unsigned package.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 09:25:39PM +0
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:29:28 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 09:25:39PM +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
>> How do you use the key(s) listed in "/etc/apt/trusted.gpg" to
>> authenticate the individual installed packages.
>
> sorry, beyond me. on my system it just works.
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:29:28 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 09:25:39PM +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
>> How do you use the key(s) listed in "/etc/apt/trusted.gpg" to
>> authenticate the individual installed packages.
>
> sorry, beyond me. on my system it just works.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 09:25:39PM +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:15:53 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:17:59PM +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
> >>
> >> The fault is mine/my setup. My connection to the internet is slow;
> >> hence I am redu
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:15:53 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:17:59PM +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
>>
>> The fault is mine/my setup. My connection to the internet is slow;
>> hence I am reduced to using the DVDs for upgrades. Although I procured
>> the "official"
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:17:59PM +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
>
> The fault is mine/my setup. My connection to the internet is slow;
> hence I am reduced to using the DVDs for upgrades. Although I procured
> the "official" Etch DVD set from a supplier listed by Debian, there were
> numerous not
Hello Ibrahim,
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 06:26:20AM -0700, Ibrahim Mubarak wrote:
> I am trying to get my hands on xserver-xorg-core version 2:1.1.1-8
> (latest is 2:1.1.1-9) as I don't keep old packages. I stumbled upon a
> website or ftp server a while back that had all past versions of
> almost
On (05/10/06 06:26), Ibrahim Mubarak wrote:
> I am having some trouble with my fonts since a recent update (aptitude
> upgrade) of my debian sid system. It's all in bug # 390681.
>
> I am trying to get my hands on xserver-xorg-core version 2:1.1.1-8
> (latest is 2:1.1.1-9) as I don't keep old pack
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 05:08:14AM -0400, Edward J. Shornock wrote:
What i would like to know is how do i solve the apt-setup problem
What's wrong with my source.list config for the "testing" distro?
Try the line in sources.list as
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main
Newer ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> What i would like to know is how do i solve the apt-setup problem
> What's wrong with my source.list config for the "testing" distro?
Try the line in sources.list as
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 01:55:52AM -0400, T wrote:
> Hi
>
> I saw now Debian packages almost all come with tags. E.g.:
>
> Tag: admin::forensics, hardware::storage, interface::commandline,
> role::sw:utility, use::scanning
>
> Is there any tools to search tools based on the tags?
apt-get ins
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:07:16 +
Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:52:38AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:38:49 +
> >Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Is anyone pulling snapshots out of gnucash's SVN and tur
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:52:38AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:38:49 +
>Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is anyone pulling snapshots out of gnucash's SVN and turning it into
>> Debian packages?
>
>nope, but I am building SVN every couple of days, ju
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:38:49 +
Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone pulling snapshots out of gnucash's SVN and turning it into
> Debian packages?
nope, but I am building SVN every couple of days, just to make sure it builds
on unstable, which it does. Also did a make distche
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:19:15 -0500 (EST)
Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a debian based box at home and can't afford to
> to apt-get update/install over a dial-up (too slow..).
> Is there a way to figure out the dependency using apt-get
> and then download .deb files (needed) on
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be really nice to have 7.4 in sarge.. Personally I think there
> should probably be enough time given the lack of messages on d-d-a
> regarding freezes and the like. 7.4 adds alot of nice things and speeds
> up a number of operations, etc.
Fu
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 18:36, Bill Moseley wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:14:45PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
>
> > Debian users wishing to install the new PostgreSQL packages should add
> > experimental to their apt/sources.list and use the -t option to apt-get.
>
> What specific sources sh
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:14:45PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Debian users wishing to install the new PostgreSQL packages should add
> experimental to their apt/sources.list and use the -t option to apt-get.
What specific sources should be used?
I'm seeing this, so I think I'm using the wro
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:13:58PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 13:46, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Do these issues mean that migrating testing from 7.3.4-9 to 7.4-1 is
> > going to be a headache for testing, or that packages built against 7.4-1
> > will depend on >= 7.4-1 due to
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:14:45PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > Debian packages of 7.4 have been uploaded to Debian's experimental
> > archive. Because of certain issues with interlocking dependencies, I
> > will not move them to unstable until versi
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 13:46, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:14:45PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > Debian packages of 7.4 have been uploaded to Debian's experimental
> > archive. Because of certain issues with interlocking dependencies, I
> > will not move them to unstable unti
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:14:45PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Debian packages of 7.4 have been uploaded to Debian's experimental
> archive. Because of certain issues with interlocking dependencies, I
> will not move them to unstable until version 7.3.4-9 is accepted into
> the testing distribu
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:26:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:19:29PM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote:
> > Since the Packages.gz has md5sums for the entire package, one scheme
> > would be to download this file from a trusted source, like the main
> > Debian website, and then
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:19:29PM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote:
> Since the Packages.gz has md5sums for the entire package, one scheme
> would be to download this file from a trusted source, like the main
> Debian website, and then compare these checksums to the downloaded
> packages that come from a
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 11:14:18PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:41:45PM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 02:57:03PM -0500, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 13:54, Scott Henson wrote:
> > > > Try debsums. Not all packages have it, bu
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:41:45PM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 02:57:03PM -0500, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 13:54, Scott Henson wrote:
> > > Try debsums. Not all packages have it, but some do.
>
> I keep seeing this statement often, but I must not be
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 02:57:03PM -0500, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 13:54, Scott Henson wrote:
> > Try debsums. Not all packages have it, but some do. Also a few weeks
> > ago there wa
I keep seeing this statement often, but I must not be understanding it
completely.
If I
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 13:54, Scott Henson wrote:
> Try debsums. Not all packages have it, but some do. Also a few weeks
> ago there wa
You can get the MD5 sums for the current packages by checking
Packages.gz for the appropriate distribution. This is relatively
reliable for Woody and Potato, but
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 00:01, Sandeep Gopal Nijsure wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for MD5 sums of the latest versions of clean Debian packages
> for "testing" distribution. I wanted them so that I could compare them
> with the sums of packages installed on a machine to see if a machine has
> b
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 11:01:01PM -0500, Sandeep Gopal Nijsure wrote:
> I am looking for MD5 sums of the latest versions of clean Debian packages
> for "testing" distribution. I wanted them so that I could compare them
> with the sums of packages installed on a machine to see if a machine has
> b
File a RFP bug... The worst that can happen is nobody takes it.
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
To find out how to request a package.
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Tiago Alves Macambira wrote:
>Now that Kylix is - sort of - free, is there any hope of seeing this
>beast in an apt-getable form?
>
>[]s
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:23:34PM +0200, Andrzej Swedrzynski wrote:
> I'm using RH on my computer but I would like to get full knowled
> ge about Debian packaging system. For example something like
> comparison between RPM and DEB formats. Can you present me with
> www addresses where I ca
Hello!
As it is english-speaking (writing) list I'll try to translate
what the guy wrote to us.
Regards,
Andrzej
--
http://kokosz.horyzont.net
http://www.earthdawn.plOn Mon, 14 May 2001, mec wrote:
> Cześć
Hi
> Używam na swoim komputerze RH ale chciałbym dowiedzieć się dużo na te
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 08:50:01AM +1000, Michael Fox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Problem I am having is with packages. I have an old machine that is still
> running Slink, and at this time I do not wish to upgrade it.
>
> With potato changing to stable, I have since modified my sources.list to
> reflect th
> > "Michael" == Michael Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> Hi, Problem I am having is with packages. I have an old
> Michael> machine that is still running Slink, and at this time I do
> Michael> not wish to upgrade it.
>
> Michael> With potato changing to stable, I have since modi
> "Michael" == Michael Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Hi, Problem I am having is with packages. I have an old
Michael> machine that is still running Slink, and at this time I do
Michael> not wish to upgrade it.
Michael> With potato changing to stable, I have since modified my
Michae
Hi,
Problem I am having is with packages. I have an old machine that is still
running Slink, and at this time I do not wish to upgrade it.
With potato changing to stable, I have since modified my sources.list to
reflect the fact that stable is not what I want, but rather slink
deb http://http.us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Two questions related to whether there are debian packages available for
> things. The first is, is there a debian version of any MP3 encoders or
> "rippers" (disclaimer: I'm only going to "rip" my own CDs for use onl
Why not add a kind of VIEWPATH environment variable to the install tool.
(like in some compilers) The package that is found first in the list of
directories
will be installed
Joop
> I agree with Ben here - the binary distribution should remain _at least_
> 486 compatible, if not 386 compatible.
It should be compatible with anything Linux can run on...
say a i386, 4M RAM, 20M(?) flash drive and late '80s video.
- Bruce
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 06:36:27PM -0600, Eric wrote:
> I was trying to install from the rpms which I converted to debs using
> alien. I didn't try installing from the source...I didn't really want
> to because I don't really want it to take the place of my normal
> gcc...I'd like to be able to r
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 05:16:51PM -0600, Eric wrote:
> That's true, it would most definitely be a "symlink farm," but what's
> so bad about that? Priorities in apt would definitely be cool. Is
> that something that is definitely going to be incorporated?
>
> eric.
>
> On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 0
I was trying to install from the rpms which I converted to debs using
alien. I didn't try installing from the source...I didn't really want
to because I don't really want it to take the place of my normal
gcc...I'd like to be able to remove it from my system easily.
How much of the pentium optim
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 02:41:03PM -0600, Eric wrote:
> I figure that they could have the important processor-intensive
> packages actually recompiled with PGCC and the rest of the things in
> binary-i686 would just be links to the packages in binary-i386.
Definately. Pentium optimised vi or cp
It depends on how it's been optimized. The FAQ on gcc.ml.org tells me
that using -mcpu will produce code which will run on any Intel CPU,
but will run best on whatever CPU you specify. However, the
-march=cpu option, which turns on optimizations which make use of the
specific instructions availa
That's true, it would most definitely be a "symlink farm," but what's
so bad about that? Priorities in apt would definitely be cool. Is
that something that is definitely going to be incorporated?
eric.
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 03:05:56PM -0600, Stephen Pitts wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but
I have heard that pentium optimised code will work on 386's. I have
even heard that I think suse use pentium optimisations on there
release
stuff (and not in its own section). Personally I would think that
would be a bad idea even if it does work though, but it is just my two
cents.
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 02:41:03PM -0600, Eric wrote:
> How about a simple solution? binary-i686 or somthing like that. This
> was actually discussed on the devel list fairly recently. However, it
> got brushed off as something that should be done when the directory
> structure on the FTP (and
How about a simple solution? binary-i686 or somthing like that. This
was actually discussed on the devel list fairly recently. However, it
got brushed off as something that should be done when the directory
structure on the FTP (and HTTP now...) servers is reorganized for dpkg
2.0. I guess th
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 09:51:57AM +0100, Sami Dalouche wrote:
> > recommended) with PGCC. The minority who have a 386/486 now can't probably
> > use
> > these software because their CPU is too slow and if they want, they could
> > use
> > the src to com
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 09:51:57AM +0100, Sami Dalouche wrote:
> recommended) with PGCC. The minority who have a 386/486 now can't probably use
> these software because their CPU is too slow and if they want, they could use
> the src to compile the softs on them own ?
The whole ideal of Linux is t
On Fri, 21 Aug 1998, Brandon Stewart wrote:
> I am looking for a good site that has Debian packages.
>
> I am extremely new to the linux OS environment
Welcome! :)
Depends on where in the world you are http://www.debian.org will be able
to point you to your nearest ftp mirror.
HTH,
Matthew
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> debmake is kind of out of fashion now and has been
> replaced by a different package called debhelper.
Well, debmake may be out of fashion, but perhaps "replaced" would not be
the right word here. They are just diff
On Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 09:43:55PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>
> > unfortunately I just got married
>
> That's not what I meant
Your wife didn't read that, did she? ;-)
Anthony
--
Anthony Fok Tung-LingCivil and Environmental Engin
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> unfortunately I just got married
That's not what I meant
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Julien wrote:
> Hi
> im making my first package using deb-make (im using a doc witch explain
> how to do with the game empire),
I am the author of that document and I have discovered to my chagrin that
the version of the document on the web site is out of date. There is a
later and more accurat
DESTDIR should be debian/tmp and not `pwd`/debian/tmp no ?
How can change it ?
No, DESTDIR should probably be an absolute path, so `pwd` is correct.
The likely cause of the error is that the program's Makefile attempts
to install files into directories that it does not create first. You
can
tony mollica wrote:
>
> Hi. For the last 2 days or so, it seems that I am unable to get to
> the packages directories from the Debian homepage/packages link. Does
> anyone else have this problem, or is the problem at my end?
>
>
>
> thanks
>
> tony mollica
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Last time I
93 matches
Mail list logo
