I don't understand the point of this email -- are you advocating for some
change, or to avoid some change?
(I looked at the bug report and skimmed some of the messages -- it seems like
by posting this to the debian-user list you are looking for comments or
support here, but the issue is not c
Thorsten Glaser:
> Just accept that this idea, originating from the systemd people at
Fedora/Freedesktop, is NOT welcome to classical Unix people.
Ahem! We classical Unix people experienced this idea in the late 1980s,
from where it *really* originated, Sun and AT&T.
* https://groups.googl
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will rep
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:49:37 +0200, Ivan Glushkov wrote:
> FYI:
>
> After updating today testing, I could not reboot with the message:
>
> cannot execute "/etc/init.d/rcS"
>
> The problem is that somehow the link to /bin/sh is missing.
> Remounting / read-w
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Ivan Glushkov wrote:
> FYI:
> After updating today testing, I could not reboot with the message:
> cannot execute "/etc/init.d/rcS"
> The problem is that somehow the link to /bin/sh is missing. Remounting /
> read-write and linking /bin
FYI:
After updating today testing, I could not reboot with the message:
cannot execute "/etc/init.d/rcS"
The problem is that somehow the link to /bin/sh is missing.
Remounting / read-write and linking /bin/bash to /bin/sh does the job.
Cheers,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list
What front end for GNU RCS do you recommend me? I found only Emacs (but
its not my editor of choice).
cheers
Simon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHE8XCEMN/lNE
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 04:57:59PM -0400, Tony Heal wrote:
> I am trying to initialize and update an rcs file manually. Here is what I am
> trying to do.
>
> Debian woody
> rcs v 5.7-13
> TWiki - 24 Nov 2001
>
> I am using the xconf plugin to parse an xconf file. This wo
I am trying to initialize and update an rcs file manually. Here is what I am
trying to do.
Debian woody
rcs v 5.7-13
TWiki - 24 Nov 2001
I am using the xconf plugin to parse an xconf file. This works fine.
I want to create an access page that will show each object in our object
/lcd), the networking file
"interfaces", the ifup/ifdown/ifconfig commands and so on.
Now my question is, what do I have to do to get the programm
started at boot up (with rcS???) having root privileges???
Thanks, best regards,
Michael.
Just put a link to the program in /etc/rcS.d or
file
"interfaces", the ifup/ifdown/ifconfig commands and so on.
Now my question is, what do I have to do to get the programm
started at boot up (with rcS???) having root privileges???
Thanks, best regards,
Michael.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
On 2004-11-29 05:08:19 -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> Arch is especially nice because you don't need a server process
> anywhere, like Subversion does, but it supports changesets, like
> Subversion does.
Subversion doesn't need a server process (unless you want a server):
The svn client can access fi
Colin wrote:
I'm surprised that no one mentioned Subversion yet.
It has been mentioned several times
Regards,
Benedict
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm surprised that no one mentioned Subversion yet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 12:52:25PM -0500, Allan Wind wrote:
> Not sure about that, actually, but integration with my favorite editor
> (vim) would be nice.
CVS, Subversion, and the venerable RCS/SCCS itelf all have available vim
integration tools. I don't know if Arch does... I haven&
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:28:17 +0100, Richard Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch,
> Subversion ...
>
> Thanks for your experiences
Set aside some time to test them all. It isn't easy to test them, you
h
ith idea of having a daemon that
shuts down after a configurable timeout.
> Honestly, you are looking for user friendly (GUI) interface to
> some RCS and no matter what kind of RCS is behind this UI.
Not sure about that, actually, but integration with my favorite editor
(vim) would be nice.
t' tool...
Sorry, I can't help you. Looking on your toughts about all those
RCSs I can say you have a big problem to find the one ;-)
Honestly, you are looking for user friendly (GUI) interface to
some RCS and no matter what kind of RCS is behind this UI.
If you see CVS syntax to dif
I just evaluated prcs, cvs and monotone for a paper, representing
somewhat the single-user scenario, client-server and peer-to-peer.
prcs can be used in a client-server setting too, but requires you to
share disks, but has otherwise a really clean interface Not widely
used, as far as I know.
cvs
User Richard Kemp wrote::
Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch,
Subversion ...
Thanks for your experiences
My favourites (in order):
- subversion
- darcs
- cvs
Here is a very nice comparsion which should help you to make a decision.
Greets
--
Mateusz Łoskot, ma
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:28:17PM +0100, Richard Kemp wrote:
> Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch,
> Subversion ...
I don't know about "best", but so far I like arch, although it is a little
bit "opaque" regarding usage.
Arch
> Richard Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-29 13:28]:
>
> Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch,
> Subversion ...
>
This depends on your requirements. I know CVS, arch and Subversion.
CVS I would not recommend anymore.
arch is reall
Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch,
Subversion ...
Thanks for your experiences
--
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:41:11PM -0800, Gruessle said
> > From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:06:52PM -0800, Gruessle wrote:
> > >
> > > arch comes up as "print machine architecture"
> > > what is the arch you are taking about?
> >
> > apt-cache show arch says loo
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:08:08PM -0800, Nunya said
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:06:52PM -0800, Gruessle wrote:
> >
> > arch comes up as "print machine architecture"
> > what is the arch you are taking about?
>
> apt-cache show arch says look for larch
Arch is the name for the...concept, sort o
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:11:02AM -0800, Gruessle wrote:
>
>
> I found following in the "Configuration HOWTO" manual.
> My question is what software do U use as Logbook and what in RCS?
Regarding keeping a log book - I would highly recommend buying a real,
physical note
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:41:02PM -0800, Gruessle wrote:
>
>
> I been trying my self on RCS
> I read the "man rcs" file
> created an rcs file with "rcs -i rebel" rebel is the name of my Debian
> box
> But I can't figure how this is supposed to wor
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 at 21:41 GMT, Gruessle penned:
>
>
> I been trying my self on RCS I read the "man rcs" file created an rcs
> file with "rcs -i rebel" rebel is the name of my Debian box But I
> can't figure how this is supposed to work. Isn't the
on Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:41:02PM -0800, Gruessle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>
> I been trying my self on RCS
> I read the "man rcs" file
> created an rcs file with "rcs -i rebel" rebel is the name of my Debian
> box
> But I can't figure how th
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 at 17:11 GMT, Gruessle penned:
>
>
> I found following in the "Configuration HOWTO" manual. My question is
> what software do U use as Logbook and what in RCS?
Assuming you mean "what *is* RCS?" ...
RCS is "Revision Control System"
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:41:11PM -0800, Gruessle wrote:
> > From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:06:52PM -0800, Gruessle wrote:
> > >
> > > arch comes up as "print machine architecture"
> > > what is the arch you are taking about?
> >
> > apt-cache show arch says l
> From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:06:52PM -0800, Gruessle wrote:
> >
> > arch comes up as "print machine architecture"
> > what is the arch you are taking about?
>
> apt-cache show arch says look for larch
> apt-cache show larch says you should really use tla
>
>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:06:52PM -0800, Gruessle wrote:
>
> arch comes up as "print machine architecture"
> what is the arch you are taking about?
apt-cache show arch says look for larch
apt-cache show larch says you should really use tla
so I guess you should read apt-cache show tla
--
To
Rob Weir said on Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 08:59:55AM +1100:
> I've started keeping my various /etc's in Arch, and it's working out
> quite well. Arch versions both the symlinks in there and the file
> permissions, as well as file changes/moves/deletions/etc. Not the file
> *ownership*, however, so I'
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:17:27PM -0500, David Z Maze said
> > "Gruessle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Make a backup copy of the system files you touch. Better
> still, use RCS;
> >
> > Ins
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:17:27PM -0500, David Z Maze said
> "Gruessle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Make a backup copy of the system files you touch. Better still, use RCS;
>
> Install the rcs package, then read rcsintro(1). (Again, though, this
> is someth
I been trying my self on RCS
I read the "man rcs" file
created an rcs file with "rcs -i rebel" rebel is the name of my Debian
box
But I can't figure how this is supposed to work.
Isn't there a way to opening the file and editing it?
rcs rebel just gives
"Gruessle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I found following in the "Configuration HOWTO" manual.
> My question is what software do U use as Logbook and what in RCS?
>
> 2.2. Start the Logbook!
> To keep your installation in shape, it's essential
I found following in the "Configuration HOWTO" manual.
My question is what software do U use as Logbook and what in RCS?
2.2. Start the Logbook!
To keep your installation in shape, it's essential that you know exactly
what happened to your machine, which packages you installed
Hi,
May I know how to close a branch in "cvs"?
Eg. branch sequence: 1.1.0.1 --> 1.1.0.2 --> 1.1.0.3
Now, how to start branch 1.2?
In rcs, I can close it with "rcs -b"
May I know how to doit in "cvs"?
thank you,
--
Abdul Latip - Junior Staff - htt
Hi,
May I know, what is "rcs -b" equivalence in "cvs"?
Eg. in a branch, the revisions sequences are as following:
1.1.0.1 --> 1.1.0.2 --> 1.1.0.3
Now, I want to start branch 1.2. In "rcs", I will close the branch
by using "rcs -b".
tha
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:27:43AM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote:
>
> What indication do you have that ntpdate is not running? Maybe you could
> add a line:
> touch /home/user/ntpdateisworking
> to the script. Reboot, if the file exists, ntpdate ran.
>
> If your date is off, try checking your timezo
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:01:39 +0200
Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that when my server gets rebooted the /etc/init.d/ntpdate
> script doesn't get run.
>
> Even though there is a symlink to it in the rcS.d directory.
>
> Where can I see that the rcS.d directory gets called? S
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:01:39 +0200
Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that when my server gets rebooted the /etc/init.d/ntpdate
> script doesn't get run.
>
> Even though there is a symlink to it in the rcS.d directory.
>
> Where can I see that the rcS.d directory gets c
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:29:59 +0200
Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:27:43AM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote:
> >
> > What indication do you have that ntpdate is not running? Maybe you
> > could add a line:
> > touch /home/user/ntpdateisworking
> > to the script. Reb
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:16:21 +0200
Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:04:22AM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:01:39 +0200
> > Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I noticed that when my server gets rebooted the
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:04:22AM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:01:39 +0200
> Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that when my server gets rebooted the /etc/init.d/ntpdate
> > script doesn't get run.
> >
> > Even though there is a symlink t
Hi,
I noticed that when my server gets rebooted the /etc/init.d/ntpdate
script doesn't get run.
Even though there is a symlink to it in the rcS.d directory.
Where can I see that the rcS.d directory gets called? So I am sure
all the scripts in there get run. (I'm actually nearly sure some
don't
hing looks fine until
> >
> > INIT: cannot execute "/etc/init.d/rcS"
> > INIT: Entering runlevel: 2
> > INIT: cannot execute "/etc/init.d/rc"
> > INIT: cannot execute "/bin/sh"
Missed the beginning of the thread, but this would be a ve
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 06:15:24PM -0400, Matt Miller wrote:
> I just installed woody (from a pile of 1.4M floppies) onto my circa 1994
> Intel 486. When trying to boot off the hard drive or off my boot floppy
> everything looks fine until
>
> INIT: cannot execute "/et
I just installed woody (from a pile of 1.4M floppies) onto my circa 1994 Intel
486. When trying to boot off the hard drive or off my boot floppy everything
looks fine until
INIT: cannot execute "/etc/init.d/rcS"
INIT: Entering runlevel: 2
INIT: cannot execute "/etc/init.d/r
ach so! I got it!
thank you very very much!
I just can not understand the '# Ignore dangling symlinks for now'.
>It is just skipping any links in rc?.d where the 'real' file linked to
>has been removed from /etc/init.d
your explaination has solved my question clearly.
Ren Weili wrote:
>
> hallo,
> I can not understand line 41 in /etc/init.d/rcS:
>
> [ ! -f "$i" ] && continue
>
> all files under /etc/rcS.d are symbolinks.
> and [ ! -f "$i" ] equals false.
>
>
hallo,
I can not understand line 41 in /etc/init.d/rcS:
[ ! -f "$i" ] && continue
all files under /etc/rcS.d are symbolinks.
and [ ! -f "$i" ] equals false.
so is this line yet necessary here ?
* xio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.12 11:47:00+]:
> 2. CVS is more difficult to setup and does not work out of the box for
> /etc.
>
> a. you have to first import the whole /etc tree to cvs
> b. symbolic links will be ignored.
> c. automated changes will be de
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 06:55:58PM +0100, Andras BALI wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 11:47:00AM +, xio wrote:
>
> > I have been playing around first with RCS and then CVS for /etc.
>
> Maybe you could check out `changetrack' before trying to implement it
> on you
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 11:47:00AM +, xio wrote:
> I have been playing around first with RCS and then CVS for /etc.
Maybe you could check out `changetrack' before trying to implement it
on your own. I use it for all my important config files and it's
really great.
Regar
Dear debian-users,
I have been playing around first with RCS and then CVS for /etc. I am
interested in comments on some things I have observed, and maybe some
answers to some of my questions:
1. RCS is easy to setup up and work out of the box for /etc. The only
limitations I could find are
Take a look at http://pusa.uv.es/~ulisses/debian
Comments/suggestions wanted
Thanks
Ulisses
Debian/GNU Linux: a dream come true
-
"Computers are useless. They can only give answers."P
"Noah L. Meyerhans" wrote:
> In order to better manage configuration changes, I have decided to place
> /etc/ under control of RCS. Naturally, doing this means that write access
> is removed from most files and 'co -l' is needed in order to edit them. I
> have
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 01:42:59PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Hey all.
> In order to better manage configuration changes, I have decided to place
> /etc/ under control of RCS. Naturally, doing this means that write access
> is remov
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 01:42:59PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Hey all.
> In order to better manage configuration changes, I have decided to place
> /etc/ under control of RCS. Naturally, doing this means that write access
> is remov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hey all.
In order to better manage configuration changes, I have decided to place
/etc/ under control of RCS. Naturally, doing this means that write access
is removed from most files and 'co -l' is needed in order to edit them. I
have placed the /etc
hi everyone,
i'm trying to learn rcs to assist my uni project, however I'm unsure about
the procedure to roll back versions (infact i think i may have found a
bug).
Say I have node_relations.c at version 1.4, but its stuffed. So i want to
go back to version 1.2.1.1 (turned into .1.1
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Griim wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm running potato, and on a vanilla install of it, I get the
> following error message:
>
> /etc/init.d/rcS: /etc/rcS.d/S35devpts.sh: line 63: syntax error:
> unexpected end of file
Known bug (typo) in libc6 package ... Mar
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 03:59:53PM -0500, Griim wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm running potato, and on a vanilla install of it, I get the
> following error message:
>
> /etc/init.d/rcS: /etc/rcS.d/S35devpts.sh: line 63: syntax error:
> unexpected end of file
>
> Anyone el
Hi,
I'm running potato, and on a vanilla install of it, I get the following error
message:
/etc/init.d/rcS: /etc/rcS.d/S35devpts.sh: line 63: syntax error: unexpected end
of file
Anyone else have this problem, or know what's going on with it? Perhaps I
merely have to wait for
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 10:25:17AM +0200, Urban Gabor wrote:
> I'm writing an RCS tutorial in Hungarian and I would like to read a
> somewhat official RCS documentiation. Any texinfo, latex or similar link
> should be wellcome.
I believe the first place to look at is :
man rcs
Hi,
I'm writing an RCS tutorial in Hungarian and I would like to read a
somewhat official RCS documentiation. Any texinfo, latex or similar link
should be wellcome.
Gabor Urban --- Lufthansa Systems Hungaria KfT
mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel : (36)-1-431-2949 Fax :(36)-1-431-2977
I am not
On 12 Aug 1998, Deniz Dogan wrote:
> Currently I`m using RCS with single files (some configuration
> files). And I need CVS to access to a CVS server. Can I purge RCS and
> install CVS and use instead of RCS? Or, do I have to use both of them
> to work with the files under RCS?
Hi,
Currently I`m using RCS with single files (some configuration
files). And I need CVS to access to a CVS server. Can I purge RCS and
install CVS and use instead of RCS? Or, do I have to use both of them
to work with the files under RCS?
Thanks in advance.
--
Deniz Dogan
Ulisses Alonso Camaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ulisses> On 9 Apr 1998, David Z. Maze wrote:
DZM>
DZM> Ulisses Alonso Camaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ulisses> I would like to use RCS within emacs, Where I can more info?
Ulisses> (the RCS Howto doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi all again!
On 9 Apr 1998, David Z. Maze wrote:
>
> Ulisses Alonso Camaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ulisses> I would like to use RCS within emacs, Where I can more info?
> Ulisses> (the RCS Howto doesn't tell too much
Ulisses Alonso Camaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ulisses> I would like to use RCS within emacs, Where I can more info?
Ulisses> (the RCS Howto doesn't tell too much)
Look in the Emacs info, under "Version Control".
--
_
/
Hi all!
I would like to use RCS within emacs, Where I can more info? (the RCS
Howto doesn't tell too much)
Any comment will be greatly appreciated,
Thanks in advance,
Ulisses
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
I did a quick search in the bugs and couldn't find anything about this
problem. If I try to generate a ChangeLog file via C-x v a works fine
on the initial run. After a changelog exists, I get this at the top of
the changelog buffer;
rlog: unknown date/time: 19/12/1997 23:41:45
rlog aborted
I tri
76 matches
Mail list logo
