On Oct 20, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Fab wrote:
Alex Samad samad.com.au> writes:
Lately I tried some different configurations (lvm & partition) to
divide
my raid
5 array.
you might want to check out http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/
BAARF2.html talks
about why you might not want to use raid5 in th
also sprach Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.18.2359 +0200]:
> you might want to check out http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/BAARF2.html talks
> about why you might not want to use raid5 in this config and maybe raid1/0
This document is included in the mdadm package. You can find it
where you
Alex Samad samad.com.au> writes:
> > Lately I tried some different configurations (lvm & partition) to divide
> > my raid
> > 5 array.
> you might want to check out http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/BAARF2.html talks
> about why you might not want to use raid5 in this config and maybe raid1/0
Th
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 07:59:36AM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:07:45PM +, Fab wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Lately I tried some different configurations (lvm & partition) to divide my
> > raid
> > 5 array.
> you might want to check out http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/BA
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:07:45PM +, Fab wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Lately I tried some different configurations (lvm & partition) to divide my
> raid
> 5 array.
you might want to check out http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/BAARF2.html talks
about why you might not want to use raid5 in this config
Hello,
Lately I tried some different configurations (lvm & partition) to divide my raid
5 array.
I noticed that partitioning the array was resulting in far better performances
than using lvm.
I have the following configuration :
-
# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
6 matches
Mail list logo