> joost witteveen wrote:
> >
> > > What on earth is wrong? I have my symlinks (asm, linux, scsi) set
> > to
> > > the kernel's include directories correctly
> >
> > Just as a side note, that isn't correct. Those to asm, linux
> > directories
> > (don't know about scsi, but probably that one too)
joost witteveen wrote:
>
> > What on earth is wrong? I have my symlinks (asm, linux, scsi) set
> to
> > the kernel's include directories correctly
>
> Just as a side note, that isn't correct. Those to asm, linux
> directories
> (don't know about scsi, but probably that one too) are provided by
>
> What on earth is wrong? I have my symlinks (asm, linux, scsi) set to
> the kernel's include directories correctly
Just as a side note, that isn't correct. Those to asm, linux directories
(don't know about scsi, but probably that one too) are provided by
the libc*-dev package, and you shouldn't
I tried using the quota-1.55-8 package and I get a segmentfault when
the quotacheck is ran.. so I decided to compile it from the source
package (I also tried to use the regular distribution file) and this
is what happened:
# make
cc -O6 -fexpensive-opti
4 matches
Mail list logo
