On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 12:09:39AM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
[..]
> I confess my vast ignorance of how all the developers, release
> managers, etc do their work on debian, but isn't the whole point of
> the operation to provide us, as users, with a system that is as
> easy as possible to use
roberto wrote:
On 9/6/05, Frederic Dernbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
roberto a écrit :
On 9/2/05, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
roberto wrote:
Hello, i was using sarge-testing for my laptop but now that sarge is
stable should i modify my sour
On 9/6/05, Frederic Dernbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> roberto a écrit :
>
> >On 9/2/05, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>roberto wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hello, i was using sarge-testing for my laptop but now that sarge is
> >>>stable should i modify my sources.list su
On 9/2/05, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> roberto wrote:
> > Hello, i was using sarge-testing for my laptop but now that sarge is
> > stable should i modify my sources.list substituting "testing" with
> > "stable"??
> >
> > Here is my sources.list
> >
> > # Official Debian
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:24:21AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:32:11PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:46:19AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:40:40PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So, until some time
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:32:11PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:46:19AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:40:40PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > >
> > > So, until some time in the far future, people should not say to
> > > newbies that release c
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:00:39PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
>
> Paul E Condon wrote:
> >
> >>>Personally, I was rather disappointed when I first made this discovery
> >>>in apt/preferences. I thought I had figured out a neat lazy-man's way
> >>>to handle the transitions from one stab
Paul E Condon wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 12:09:39AM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 02:48:33PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
"Don't use release code names in configuring the apt system."
seems to me to be a good general rule.
As a comment to those who have used co
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:11:04PM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:40:40PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 12:09:39AM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> >
> > > Paul, I think you were one of those (forgive me if I'm wrong) who
> > > shot me down a coup
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:46:19AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:40:40PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> >
> > So, until some time in the far future, people should not say to
> > newbies that release code names and release status names ('stable',
> > 'testing', etc.) are in
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:40:40PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 12:09:39AM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
>
> > Paul, I think you were one of those (forgive me if I'm wrong) who
> > shot me down a couple of months ago for suggesting that such words
> > as "stable", "testin
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:40:40PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> So, until some time in the far future, people should not say to
> newbies that release code names and release status names ('stable',
> 'testing', etc.) are interchangeable. They are not. Existing support
> for release code names i
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 12:09:39AM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 02:48:33PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> >
> >
> > "Don't use release code names in configuring the apt system."
> >
> > seems to me to be a good general rule.
> >
> > As a comment to those who have used c
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 02:48:33PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> I have just run a test of the use of 'sarge' in apt.conf.
> On my machine, currently running sarge/stable, the statement
> APT::DefaultRelease "sarge"
> has no effect. Aptitude still goes for the highest version
> number, which ha
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:58:20AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
>
> roberto wrote:
> >Hello, i was using sarge-testing for my laptop but now that sarge is
> >stable should i modify my sources.list substituting "testing" with
> >"stable"??
> >
> >Here is my sources.list
> >
> ># Official
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 07:20:21PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 18:59 +0200, roberto wrote:
> > Hello, i was using sarge-testing for my laptop but now that sarge is
> > stable should i modify my sources.list substituting "testing" with
> > "stable"??
>
> Yes.
> But
Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:58:20AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
yes you need to put
deb http://ftp./debian/ stable main...
deb-src http:///debian/ stable main ...
sources.list tells apt where to find the packages.
but you also need to edit /etc/apt/apt.co
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:58:20AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> yes you need to put
>
> deb http://ftp./debian/ stable main...
> deb-src http:///debian/ stable main ...
>
> sources.list tells apt where to find the packages.
>
> but you also need to edit /etc/apt/apt.conf
My
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 07:20:21PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 18:59 +0200, roberto wrote:
> > Hello, i was using sarge-testing for my laptop but now that sarge is
> > stable should i modify my sources.list substituting "testing" with
> > "stable"??
>
> Yes.
> But
roberto wrote:
Hello, i was using sarge-testing for my laptop but now that sarge is
stable should i modify my sources.list substituting "testing" with
"stable"??
Here is my sources.list
# Official Debian mirror
deb http://ftp.it.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib
deb-src http://
roberto wrote:
Hello, i was using sarge-testing for my laptop but now that sarge is
stable should i modify my sources.list substituting "testing" with
"stable"??
[snip]
--
roberto
debian sarge, kernel 2.6.8
If you want to stay with sarge (and run stable) then yes, I think you
need to.
If
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 18:59 +0200, roberto wrote:
> Hello, i was using sarge-testing for my laptop but now that sarge is
> stable should i modify my sources.list substituting "testing" with
> "stable"??
Yes.
But it would have been simpler if you directly used "sarge", instead of
"testing/unstable/
Hello, i was using sarge-testing for my laptop but now that sarge is
stable should i modify my sources.list substituting "testing" with
"stable"??
Here is my sources.list
I tried also sources.list(5) man page but i did not find things useful
thank you! :)
#
23 matches
Mail list logo
