RE: question about LDAP conventions

2003-03-21 Thread Jeremy Gaddis
> -Original Message- > From: Haim Ashkenazi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:42 AM > To: Debian User > Subject: question about LDAP conventions > > I'm trying to learn to implement ldap in organizations, so > I've read a few

Re: question about LDAP conventions

2003-03-21 Thread Haim Ashkenazi
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:26:30 -0800 (PST) "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > there is nothing significant about them. they are only parts of a tree. > they can be named anything, can have anything stored in them..the name > is not important. So it's accepted to create an organizational unit calle

Re: question about LDAP conventions

2003-03-21 Thread nate
Haim Ashkenazi said: > Hi > > I'm trying to learn to implement ldap in organizations, so I've read a few > ldap howto's and I know how to do some basic stuff. my problem is that I > don't fully understand the naming conventions (maybe due to a lack of > knowledge in english...). In the default debi

question about LDAP conventions

2003-03-21 Thread Haim Ashkenazi
Hi I'm trying to learn to implement ldap in organizations, so I've read a few ldap howto's and I know how to do some basic stuff. my problem is that I don't fully understand the naming conventions (maybe due to a lack of knowledge in english...). In the default debian install there are 2 organiz