On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:34:43AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >Pretty much everything that depends on exim accepts mail-transport-agent
> >as an alternative, unless it has very specialized requirements. If it
> >doesn't, it's a bug. Since the qmail packages built from qmail-s
Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 04:37:19PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
I know that the default installation is to use exim.
But I would like to use qmail in it's place on at least one server.
My question is this:
Are the dependencies for various email needing packages going to be ab
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:10:47AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >Pretty much everything that depends on exim accepts mail-transport-agent
> >as an alternative, unless it has very specialized requirements. If it
> >doesn't, it's a bug. Since the qmail packages built from qmail-s
Colin Watson wrote:
Pretty much everything that depends on exim accepts mail-transport-agent
as an alternative, unless it has very specialized requirements. If it
doesn't, it's a bug. Since the qmail packages built from qmail-src
provide mail-transport-agent, you should be OK.
That's great!
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 04:37:19PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> I know that the default installation is to use exim.
> But I would like to use qmail in it's place on at least one server.
>
> My question is this:
> Are the dependencies for various email needing packages going to be able
> to unders
I know that the default installation is to use exim.
But I would like to use qmail in it's place on at least one server.
My question is this:
Are the dependencies for various email needing packages going to be able
to understand that I'm using qmail instead of exim and still meet the
requiremen
6 matches
Mail list logo
