Dan Ritter writes:
> [...]
> In particular, Debian has the mailfront package, which is Bruce
> Guenter's qmail-compatible set of tools. From the description:
>
> It contains complete SMTP, QMQP, QMTP, and POP3 front-ends as well as
> an authentication module for I
On 2021-12-24 17:00+0200, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> On 12/24/21 14:58, 황병희 wrote:
> > Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
> The software seems unmaintained for a long time [1]. According to
> wikipedia the last release is from 1998 and I think there was
황병희 wrote:
> > 3) Build and install qmail from your preferred source tree.
And I've seen your posts on the qmail list, so you should
definitely take their advice on which version to use.
> > 4) Set up the symlink from /usr/sbin/sendmail to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail
> >
On 12/24/21 14:58, 황병희 wrote:
> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
The software seems unmaintained for a long time [1]. According to
wikipedia the last release is from 1998 and I think there was an
incompatibility with the qmail's license and Debian. I've
Dear Greg,
Greg Wooledge writes:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote:
>> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
>
> If you wish to use qmail, the recommended way to do it is:
>
> 1) Install equivs, and use it to build the "mta-
Andy Smith writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote:
>> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
>
> It was removed from Debian in May 2020 and hasn't been in a release
> since buster:
>
> https://b
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote:
> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
If you wish to use qmail, the recommended way to do it is:
1) Install equivs, and use it to build the "mta-local" package.
There's an example file for it:
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote:
> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
It was removed from Debian in May 2020 and hasn't been in a release
since buster:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961289
If you still have
It seems that netqmail (the package that provides qmail) was removed
last year:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961289
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote:
> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
> Bellow are my environments:
>
Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
Bellow are my environments:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.2
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x8
hi,
I had the following error when running the qmail program
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd: error while loading shared libraries:
libcrypto.so.0.9.8: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot
allocate memory
help me pls.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hello,
I'm migrating an old mail server (qmail) to a new server (new hw). I want to
add some anti-spam and anti-virus filter to qmail. I'm thinking about two
solutions:
- Qmail-ldap + qmail-scanner+clamav+spamassassin
- Qmail-ldap + clamsmtp + spampd + iptables
What do you think ab
Hi guys,
Does anyone know a program similar to this for qmail?
http://pfqueue.sourceforge.net/
Thanks
Hans
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
things like open relays, etc from originating from our IP
space. I would check their first.
Craig Russell
AirDigitalNetwork.com
gaston Rey wrote:
Hello I have a Big problem, I am mounting a Mail
Server with qmail from my house with my personal
conection, the problem is that when I send messages
Hello I have a Big problem, I am mounting a Mail
Server with qmail from my house with my personal
conection, the problem is that when I send messages
from a PC on my LAN configured with pop3 it can send
Ok and I check it was received but if I want to
response this mail it never arrive to
Christopher Pharo Glæserud wrote:
Eric Persson,
I'm having trouble on a new server where I'm trying to remove exim4 and
instead use qmail(which I install from source). How should I do to make
the dependencies of exim4 work but still be able to use qmail?
You could create a dum
Eric Persson,
> I'm having trouble on a new server where I'm trying to remove exim4 and
> instead use qmail(which I install from source). How should I do to make
> the dependencies of exim4 work but still be able to use qmail?
You could create a dummy package that provi
Hi,
I'm having trouble on a new server where I'm trying to remove exim4 and
instead use qmail(which I install from source). How should I do to make
the dependencies of exim4 work but still be able to use qmail?
/eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
orization failure when you use telnet, I'm not as sure.
Have you checked qmail-pop3d's log files for anything indicating the
programs failing to run? Can you try running qmail-popup/checkpassword/
qmail-pop3d using the same softlimits that tcpserver uses to see if
that's the cu
I've been running qmail on testing for some time now (several years
altogether, right at a year on this box.) Recently, following a reboot, I
stopped downloading mail to Kmail via pop3. (Kmail runs on my desktop
machine, and qmail is running on my server.) Some troubleshooting revealed
Hi Guys
I hope somebody could help me with how to install qmail.
I need qmail install with ldap and samba version 3 it must also have kerberos.
Please can someone help me on this topic.
Merhaba Emre,
I think, it is better, if you ask at
because I think, here in the englich list they
are rarly peoples speaking urkish
Salamlar
Michelle
(my father was turkish)
Am 2005-12-21 14:44:57, schrieb Emre Sevinç:
> Bir dostum Qmail ile ilgili so
Bir dostum Qmail ile ilgili sordu:
=
/service/qmail-send: up (pid 2842) 33169 seconds
/service/qmail-send/log: up (pid 2844) 33168 seconds
/service/qmail-smtpd: up (pid 2845) 33168 seconds
/service/qmail-smtpd/log: up (pid 2852) 33168 seconds
Jay Zach wrote:
> Jay Zach wrote:
>
>>For some reason I keep getting multiple messages of the same message to my
>>inbox. Qmail redelivers all messages multiple times, like it thinks that it
>>doesn't deliver them, even though it does. I play around with it and chan
Jay Zach wrote:
> For some reason I keep getting multiple messages of the same message to my
> inbox. Qmail redelivers all messages multiple times, like it thinks that it
> doesn't deliver them, even though it does. I play around with it and change
> permissions, and restart qm
For some reason I keep getting multiple messages of the same message to my
inbox. Qmail redelivers all messages multiple times, like it thinks that it
doesn't deliver them, even though it does. I play around with it and change
permissions, and restart qmail, and it seems to start working,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 05:54:10PM +0300, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to find replacement for qmail/vpopmail (that is, mail server
> with virtual domains and non-system users). the reason I'm doing that is
> that I'm installing many servers with th
Hi
I'm trying to find replacement for qmail/vpopmail (that is, mail server
with virtual domains and non-system users). the reason I'm doing that is
that I'm installing many servers with this configuration, and doing it
from source is a lot of work (installing and searching for s
when I:
# ps waux | grep qmail
I get:
root 1350 0.0 0.020 16 ?S18:07 0:00
supervise qmail-smtpd
root 1352 0.0 0.020 16 ?S18:07 0:00
supervise qmail-send
root 1354 0.0 0.020 16 ?S18:07 0:00
supervise qmail-pop3d
qmaill
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:29:18AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed qmail-src and removed its patched qmail-1.03 folder.
> I unzipped its qmail_1.03.orig.tar.gz file and then patched it with the
> following patches from qmailrocks.org:
> qmail-1.03-force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I installed qmail-src and removed its patched qmail-1.03 folder.
I unzipped its qmail_1.03.orig.tar.gz file and then patched it with the
following patches from qmailrocks.org:
qmail-1.03-forcetls-20040703.patch
qmail-1.03-jms1.5.patch
I also
I found www.QMailRocks.Org
very helpful. J Better have a look at it.
Fateh ud din B. Mehmood,
Dubai – UAE
Ok, I know Postfix is the mail server most people use when they're
leaving qmail, but that's only the first part of the solution I'm
looking for.
My current setup is using qmail in conjunction with vpopmail and
qmailadmin. Vpopmail is handy not just because I host several virtu
On Sunday 14 November 2004 16:40, David Garamond wrote:
> David Garamond wrote:
> > We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 +
> > qmail + vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the
> > choice of MTA to use.
>
> Oh, I should a
Ollie Acheson wrote:
I guess my first question is why do you want to stop using qmail? It's
highly secure and robust, plus you have already climbed its learning curve.
The reasons are partly convenience and partly a political decision. We
try to use only packages from the official main D
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 10:40:13PM +0700, David Garamond wrote:
> David Garamond wrote:
> >We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 + qmail
> >+ vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the choice of
> >MTA to use.
>
>
On Sunday 14 November 2004 21:38, michael wrote:
> Folks - a quite one...
>
> With ssh on my Debian server I do not seem to be able to tunnel X back
> to the client (however, from the client I can successfully tunnel X back
> when connecting to another client). Obviously I'm doing something wrong
>
On Sunday 14 November 2004 15:19, David Garamond wrote:
> We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 + qmail
> + vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the choice of
> MTA to use.
>
> Requirements:
> - Maildir support;
> - Software
Folks - a quite one...
With ssh on my Debian server I do not seem to be able to tunnel X back
to the client (however, from the client I can successfully tunnel X back
when connecting to another client). Obviously I'm doing something wrong
but any ideas? Here's the output from the remote machine:
robin wrote:
Looking via synaptic: qmail-src
Source only package for building qmail binary package
qmail is a secure Secure, reliable, efficient, simple mail transport
system.
Or you can use precompiled binary packages
http://smarden.org/pape/Debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
David Garamond wrote:
Cristi Banciu wrote:
We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 +
qmail + vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the
choice of MTA to use.
Oh, I should add that I'm pretty clueless when it comes to other
MTAs. I've
Cristi Banciu wrote:
We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 +
qmail + vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the
choice of MTA to use.
Oh, I should add that I'm pretty clueless when it comes to other MTAs.
I've used qmail ever since
David Garamond wrote:
David Garamond wrote:
We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 +
qmail + vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the
choice of MTA to use.
Oh, I should add that I'm pretty clueless when it comes to other MTAs.
I've
David Garamond wrote:
We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 + qmail
+ vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the choice of
MTA to use.
Oh, I should add that I'm pretty clueless when it comes to other MTAs.
I've used qmail ever since
We are planning to migrate a bunch of hosting servers from RH73 + qmail
+ vmailmgr to Sarge and I'd appreciate on the comments of the choice of
MTA to use.
Requirements:
- Maildir support;
- Software binary packages are in the main Debian archive (so we are
guaranteed prompt security up
Is anyone else having problems updating Qmail from 1.03-31 to 1.03-32? On 2
Sarge machines the updated -32 source builds fine and produces the .deb, but
upon trying to install it, it hangs at 'Setting up Qmail", at least it hadn't
proceeded after 20 minutes. Tried removing a
Vijaya S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I was wondering if it possible to configure Qmail so it only accepts
>> > e-mails from a specific IP addresses?
>>
>> Take a look at /etc/tcp.smtp. It is mentioned in chapter 5 of
>> the qmail FAQ.
>>
>
Yes it is very much possible.For that u need to do relaying.
Edit
vi /etc/tcp.smtp
x.x.x.x:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
:allow
[x.x.x.x is the ip address]
Regards,
Vijaya
John L Fjellstad wrote:
> "Colin Theseira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I was wonderin
"Colin Theseira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering if it possible to configure Qmail so it only accepts
> e-mails from a specific IP addresses?
Take a look at /etc/tcp.smtp. It is mentioned in chapter 5 of
the qmail FAQ.
And qmail doesn't relay by defa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Colin Theseira wrote:
> Can you help me by telling me where I can find documentation to configure
> our Qmail server so it will only accept inbound e-mails from the Postini
> server? Any help you can offer will b
Hello,
I was wondering if it possible to
configure Qmail so it only accepts e-mails from a specific IP addresses? We use
a spam service called Postini and our MX record now points to the Postini mail servers. However, lately we noticed some e-mails are
being forwarded directly to our Qmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know what the package name is for qmail on sarge? I have
> tried to do an apt-get install qmail but it did not work it said the
> package may not be available any more.
There is no binary package for qmail because of licensing. There is a
qmail-s
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 02:27:14PM -0500 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know what the package name is for qmail on sarge? I have
> tried to do an apt-get install qmail but it did not work it said the
> package may not be available any more.
Perhaps it's
Hi,
I don't know, but did you try
% apt-cache search
and
% apt-cache search | grep qmail
to find out?
hope this helps.
Sylvain.
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 21:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da> Does anyone know what the package name is for qmail on sarge? I have
Da> tried to do an apt-
Does anyone know what the package name is for qmail on sarge? I have
tried to do an apt-get install qmail but it did not work it said the
package may not be available any more.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I'm not that familiar with PHP, but...
"Lars E. D. Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've tried both:
> sendmail -> /var/qmail/bin/sendmail
> and
> sendmail -> qmail-sendmail
What does this mean? Did you create a symlink or something? q
Assuming continued unsuccess in configuring qmail and a broken qmail-run
package, had to reinstall exim4 to keep cron/anacron stuff working. This
looks much easier to configure and just as secure/unsecure as using simple
kmail accesses.
All I have to do is place host:login:password in the
ever, I do
> not know to where the message was successfully sent.
> Qmail is not sitting on my two email providers.
>
> "Used up" the documentation I have seen. I have the webmin qmail module which
> eases entry of items but still do not know how to set this up.
>
Someone
OK, so far, I have gotten:
In syslog:
Unsuccessful attempts by cron runs to send to "anonymous.my_domain.my_domain"
Successful attampts by cron runs to send to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"--however, I do
not know to where the message was successfully sent.
Qmail is not sitting on my
Bill Carlson wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, David Baron wrote:
I have not found understandable documentation. I have the webmin qmail but do
not know what to do with it.
I want qmail as daemon to service a couple of email addresses, sending through
one of them, as well as the system
Karsten M. Self wrote:
> Just say "No" to proprietary mailers.
Sure - as soon as Postfix or Exim implement a simple, flexible delivery
mechanism similar to what qmail offers, and make it as easy as qmail does
to insert filters at various points in the mail-handling routine.
Besid
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, David Baron wrote:
> I have not found understandable documentation. I have the webmin qmail but do
> not know what to do with it.
>
> I want qmail as daemon to service a couple of email addresses, sending through
> one of them, as well as the system not
on Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 10:57:38PM +0300, David Baron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have not found understandable documentation. I have the webmin qmail but do
> not know what to do with it.
>
> I want qmail as daemon to service a couple of email addresses, sending through
>
I have not found understandable documentation. I have the webmin qmail but do
not know what to do with it.
I want qmail as daemon to service a couple of email addresses, sending through
one of them, as well as the system notification email formerly handled
through the smail (removed when
Daniel Guido wrote:
> I downloaded the qmail-src package from unstable and want to know how to
> get SMTP AUTH and TLS to work.
I don't know how to make it work with the Debian package, but if you
download the vanilla qmail sources (or even better - netqmail) from
www.qmail.org, ther
I downloaded the qmail-src package from unstable and want to know how to
get SMTP AUTH and TLS to work.
The patches available on the internet don't patch cleanly to the debian
provided source. After a little investigation I found 3 files in the
/patches/ldap-patches/ directory that are
Thanx, looks like http://smarden.org/pape/Debian/ is the way to go. Thanx
also to Dee.
Anil Gupte
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Weinbender" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 8:22 AM
Subject: Re:
Correction:
should be "apt-get install qmail-run"
*
Rick Weinbender wrote:
> Qmail is kind of a difficult install.
> Some of the references I used were:
> www.qmail.org
> http://smarden.org/pape/Debian/
> http://www.lifewithqmail.org
> *
&g
Qmail is kind of a difficult install.
Some of the references I used were:
www.qmail.org
http://smarden.org/pape/Debian/
http://www.lifewithqmail.org
*
the smarden.org...site has a backport which makes
installation much easier. Once you setup your
sources.list, you just "apt-get install qmai
>-Original Message-
>From: Anil Gupte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 04:27 AM
>To: 'debian-user-list'
>Subject: Error trying to install Qmail on Debian
>
>I used the instructions at
>http://www.pantz.org/email/qmail/qmailondebian.
I used the instructions at
http://www.pantz.org/email/qmail/qmailondebian.shtml to attempt to install
Qmail. Specifically, I used (in that order):
apt-get install ucspi-tcp-src
apt-get install qmail-src
apt-get install procmail
build-ucspi-tcp
build-qmail
At this point it fails. The latter
David Fokkema wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:27:19AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:38:02AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> >> The clamav is not a bad solution (although I wo
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:27:19AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:38:02AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> >> The clamav is not a bad solution (although I wouldn't recommend it to a
> >> c
Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:38:02AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> The clamav is not a bad solution (although I wouldn't recommend it to a
>> company).
>
> This intrigues me. Why wouldn't you recommend it to a company?
Be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:38:02AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> The clamav is not a bad solution (although I wouldn't recommend it to a
> company).
This intrigues me. Why wouldn't you recommend it to a company?
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:14:41PM -0600, Rick Weinbender wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good open source (email)
> anti-virus solution for Qmail running on Debian Stable.
I solved this for exim, if you figure it out for qmail, lemme know an
Rick Weinbender wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good open source (email)
> anti-virus solution for Qmail running on Debian Stable.
> Or even a reasonably priced commercial solution
> if it is good.
Bye
> *
> I see M$ has bought out RAV-anti-virus.
> I've been looki
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:14:41PM -0600, Rick Weinbender wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good open source (email)
> anti-virus solution for Qmail running on Debian Stable.
> Or even a reasonably priced commercial solution
> if it is good.
> *
> I see M$ has bought out RAV-anti-
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Rick Weinbender wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good open source (email)
> anti-virus solution for Qmail running on Debian Stable.
> Or even a reasonably priced commercial solution
> if it is good.
> *
> I see M$ has bought out RAV-anti-virus.
> I've
Can anyone recommend a good open source (email)
anti-virus solution for Qmail running on Debian Stable.
Or even a reasonably priced commercial solution
if it is good.
*
I see M$ has bought out RAV-anti-virus.
I've been looking at Clam anti-virus.
Thanks,
-Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 03:19:44AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:19:28AM -0800, Deryk Barker wrote:
> > enough to contain the axioms of arithmetic, then there are statements
> > which can be made but not proved within that system. It is possible to
> > add further axi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:19:28AM -0800, Deryk Barker wrote:
> enough to contain the axioms of arithmetic, then there are statements
> which can be made but not proved within that system. It is possible to
> add further axioms to prove the statements, but then this richer
> axiomatic base will lea
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:19:28AM -0800, Deryk Barker wrote:
> Thus spake Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> ...
> > I thought it was neither complete (the doesn't capture all truths thing)
> > nor consistent (may contain both a statement and its complement)[1].
> > But I can look that up.
> >
> > The S
Thus spake Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
...
> I thought it was neither complete (the doesn't capture all truths thing)
> nor consistent (may contain both a statement and its complement)[1].
> But I can look that up.
>
> The Stanford prof told me the Lambda calculus (Lisp-ish stuff) almost
> proved o
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:07:18AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:01:16AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:27:37AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:00:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> > >
> > > > ... that in any sufficiently complex formal system the
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:01:16AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:27:37AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:00:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> >
> > > ... that in any sufficiently complex formal system there are no guarantees
> > > it won't grind out falsehoods ...
>
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:27:37AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:00:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
>
> > ... that in any sufficiently complex formal system there are no guarantees
> > it won't grind out falsehoods ...
>
> But Goedel's Theorem actually says that in any formal system
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:00:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> ... that in any sufficiently complex formal system there are no guarantees
> it won't grind out falsehoods ...
But Goedel's Theorem actually says that in any formal system, there will be
true propositions that cannot be proved (without going
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:19:37PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> and you weren't in it for the $$$ ??
> (just that bugs and exploits exists? )
When I learned about Godel's work I really freaked out.
When I learned there are certain true statements which are not
expressible by manipulation of symbo
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Tom wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 09:55:59AM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 04:34:43 -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Bernstein pays $500 for each verifiable security hole in qmail.
> > > Fo
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 08:47:28PM +1100, Andre Marenke wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a minimal Debian install with an Exim in broken configuration. In
> addition, I have installed qmail which is running fine.
>
> Is there a way to uninstall Exim and have dpkg recognize my qmail
> i
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 08:47:28PM +1100, Andre Marenke wrote:
>
> Is there a way to uninstall Exim and have dpkg recognize my qmail
> installation as the system mailer so that I can install other packages
> that rely on an mta?
apt-cache show equivs
--
Jamin W. Collins
To b
Hello Andre!
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 08:47:28PM +1100, Andre Marenke wrote:
I have a minimal Debian install with an Exim in broken configuration. In
addition, I have installed qmail which is running fine.
Is there a way to uninstall Exim and have dpkg recognize my qmail
installation as the
Hi,
I have a minimal Debian install with an Exim in broken configuration. In
addition, I have installed qmail which is running fine.
Is there a way to uninstall Exim and have dpkg recognize my qmail
installation as the system mailer so that I can install other packages
that rely on an mta?
The
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 02:28:40PM +1100, Ross Tsolakidis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently installed qmail, I removed Exim just to be sure.
> Everything is now running fine.
>
> The problem I'm having is every time I try and install another package,
> it always attempts
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 02:28:40PM +1100, Ross Tsolakidis wrote:
> I recently installed qmail, I removed Exim just to be sure.
> Everything is now running fine.
If everything is "running fine", then why the posting?
> The problem I'm having is every time I try and insta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 04:28, Ross Tsolakidis wrote:
Adding to what Collins wrote.
All you need to do is create a "fake" package to meet the requirement of a
MTA. You can create this using the equivs package, or I can send you mine if
you wan
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 02:28:40PM +1100, Ross Tsolakidis wrote:
>
> I recently installed qmail, I removed Exim just to be sure.
> Everything is now running fine.
>
> The problem I'm having is every time I try and install another package,
> it always attempts to re-inst
Hi all,
I recently installed qmail, I removed Exim just to be sure.
Everything is now running fine.
The problem I'm having is every time I try and install another package,
it always attempts to re-install exim.
For example, "apt-get install apache", it will attempt to install
Is there anyway to configure Logrotate to 'skip' certain files?
Logrotate is rotating /var/log/qmail/current once a week, and during
this process it creates a 'previous' file(/var/log/qmail/previous) which
causes qmail to stop processing mail (Fails with 'unable to s
1 - 100 of 432 matches
Mail list logo
