I should have thought to do 'man interfaces' before today. :) I'm not
used to doing 'man ', rather 'man '.
Suggestion -- the default interfaces file should have something like
what is shown below already there, only commented out and something
telling people to 'man interfaces' for even more
* Chad M Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030921 18:10]:
> Where is the proper place in debian to define the default route? I've
> got my own hack, but I'd like to know the 'proper' place.
In the file /etc/network/interfaces with a "gateway"-line.
Yours sincerely
Alexander
pgp0.pgp
Descr
Chad M Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Where is the proper place in debian to define the default route?
> I've got my own hack, but I'd like to know the 'proper' place.
You probably want a 'gateway' line in /etc/network/interfaces on
exactly one interface that's up.
--
David Maze
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 12:10, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> Where is the proper place in debian to define the default route? I've
> got my own hack, but I'd like to know the 'proper' place.
/etc/network/interfaces:
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.1.200
netmask 255.255.255.0
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:10:23PM -0400, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> Where is the proper place in debian to define the default route? I've
> got my own hack, but I'd like to know the 'proper' place.
Unless you're doing something truly outrageous, there should be no reason
to need to define anythin
Where is the proper place in debian to define the default route? I've
got my own hack, but I'd like to know the 'proper' place.
-Chad-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo
