Re: prolonged number crunching

2001-12-07 Thread Andrew Perrin
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Alec wrote: > On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:41 pm, dman wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:21:41PM -0500, Alec wrote: > > | Hi > > | > > | I have a program that produces output to STDOUT and will probably take > > | several days to run. I already figured that it's better t

Re: prolonged number crunching

2001-12-07 Thread Jor-el
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Alec wrote: > Hi > > I have a program that produces output to STDOUT and will probably take > several days to run. I already figured that it's better to run it using "at" > utility and collect the results by email. This way the program will not be > bound to any specific te

Re: prolonged number crunching

2001-12-07 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 20:21, Alec wrote: > Hi > > I have a program that produces output to STDOUT and will probably take > several days to run. I already figured that it's better to run it using "at" > utility and collect the results by email. This way the program will not be > bound to any spe

Re: prolonged number crunching

2001-12-06 Thread Michel Loos
On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 03:00, Alec wrote: > On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:41 pm, dman wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:21:41PM -0500, Alec wrote: > > | Hi > > | > > | I have a program that produces output to STDOUT and will probably take > > | several days to run. I already figured that it's

Re: prolonged number crunching

2001-12-06 Thread Alec
On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:41 pm, dman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:21:41PM -0500, Alec wrote: > | Hi > | > | I have a program that produces output to STDOUT and will probably take > | several days to run. I already figured that it's better to run it using > | "at" utility and collect t

Re: prolonged number crunching

2001-12-06 Thread dman
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:21:41PM -0500, Alec wrote: | Hi | | I have a program that produces output to STDOUT and will probably take | several days to run. I already figured that it's better to run it using "at" | utility and collect the results by email. This way the program will not be | bou

prolonged number crunching

2001-12-06 Thread Alec
Hi I have a program that produces output to STDOUT and will probably take several days to run. I already figured that it's better to run it using "at" utility and collect the results by email. This way the program will not be bound to any specific terminal and, say crashing X, will not interrup