Re: programs using the /proc interface are broken.

2008-08-20 Thread Chris Bannister
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:29:02AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2008-08-19 10:39 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at > > least with the later kernels. > > No, only those that read /proc/acpi/battery. That dire

Re: programs using the /proc interface are broken.

2008-08-19 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Sven Joachim wrote: On 2008-08-19 10:39 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote: Hi, It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at least with the later kernels. No, only those that read /proc/acpi/battery. That directory does not exist in current Debian kernels because of the

Re: programs using the /proc interface are broken.

2008-08-19 Thread Ron Johnson
On 08/19/08 04:29, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2008-08-19 10:39 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote: Hi, It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at least with the later kernels. No, only those that read /proc/acpi/battery. That directory does not exist in current Debian ker

Re: programs using the /proc interface are broken.

2008-08-19 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-08-19 10:39 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at > least with the later kernels. No, only those that read /proc/acpi/battery. That directory does not exist in current Debian kernels because of the reckless decisio

programs using the /proc interface are broken.

2008-08-19 Thread Chris Bannister
Hi, It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at least with the later kernels. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uname -a Linux box 2.6.25-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Jul 18 17:46:56 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux Compare: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# acpi -b Battery 0: Charging, 100%, until charged