Le vendredi 16 décembre 2011 08:26:06 Sthu Deus, vous avez écrit :
> Thank You for Your time and answer, afuentes:
> >> nethogs let you see like ntop which process do network I/O.
> >
> >Awesome program! thanks!
> >This is what the OP was asking for :)
>
> Absolutely!
>
> Thank You very much, Gil
Sthu Deus wrote:
> For I have closed all the user's network app.s - still the machine
> connects to Internet - sends queries to DNS, bittorrent - while the
> user does not ask for it any more.
You've had bittorrent running on this box? That could easily explain the
UDP traffic you're seeing. Your
Thank You for Your time and answer, afuentes:
>> nethogs let you see like ntop which process do network I/O.
>
>Awesome program! thanks!
>This is what the OP was asking for :)
Absolutely!
Thank You very much, Gilles!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 21:20 +0100, Gilles Mocellin wrote:
> nethogs let you see like ntop which process do network I/O.
Awesome program! thanks!
This is what the OP was asking for :)
greets!
aL
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Thank You for Your time and answer, J.A.:
>> How do I find out which process on the system does send/receive
>> network packets?
>>
>>
>> Thanks for Your time.
>Hi Sthu,
>
>The commands lsof and fuser might be just what you are looking for.
May, You can advice/share experience how to narrow its
Thank You for Your time and answer, Joe:
>> For I have closed all the user's network app.s - still the machine
>> connects to Internet - sends queries to DNS, bittorrent - while the
>> user does not ask for it any more.
>>
>
>You do realise that bittorrent is a peer-to-peer service, don't you?
>I
Le mardi 13 décembre 2011 10:00:54 J.A. de vries, vous avez écrit :
> On 2011-12-12 15:43:51 Sthu Deus wrote:
> > Good time of the day.
> >
> >
> > On a desktop system I have noticed a bit of network traffic whereas
> > users do not run any network software...
> >
> > How do I find out which pro
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 01:41, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Kelly:
>
>
> The problem is it does not tell me anything - being run under root
> (sudo). This is all I get:
>
> netstat --inet -ap -n
>
> Active Internet connections (servers and established)
>
> Proto Recv-Q S
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:41:18 +0700
Sthu Deus wrote:
>
> For I have closed all the user's network app.s - still the machine
> connects to Internet - sends queries to DNS, bittorrent - while the
> user does not ask for it any more.
>
You do realise that bittorrent is a peer-to-peer service, don'
Thank You for Your time and answer, John:
>thumper/~ apt-cache search shaper
>shaperd - A user-mode traffic shaper for tcp-ip networks
>trickle - user-space bandwidth shaper
>wondershaper - Easy to use traffic shaping script
>
>thumper/~ apt-cache search netstat
>bwm-ng - small and simple console-
Thank You for Your time and answer, Kelly:
>>>Something like:
>>>netstat --inet -ap
>>>
>>>"--inet" so you are looking at network sockets rather than unix
>>>sockets, "-a" shows both established connections and listening
>>>processes, "-p" shows PID and process name.
>>
>> I have tried this but it
Thank You for Your time and answer, Joe:
>Run netstat as root to see the PIDs and program names of everything,
>otherwise it will only show you that data for processes you own.
>
>If you also use the -n flag, it will run much faster as it won't do DNS
>or service name lookups. Some of the service
On 2011-12-12 15:43:51 Sthu Deus wrote:
> Good time of the day.
>
>
> On a desktop system I have noticed a bit of network traffic whereas
> users do not run any network software...
>
> How do I find out which process on the system does send/receive network
> packets?
>
>
> Thanks for Your time
Thank You for Your time and answer, Kelly:
>> Run netstat as root to see the PIDs and program names of everything,
>> otherwise it will only show you that data for processes you own.
>>
>> If you also use the -n flag, it will run much faster as it won't do
>> DNS or service name lookups. Some of t
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:01, Joe wrote:
>
> Run netstat as root to see the PIDs and program names of everything,
> otherwise it will only show you that data for processes you own.
>
> If you also use the -n flag, it will run much faster as it won't do DNS
> or service name lookups. Some of the s
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 01:07:42 +0700
Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Kelly:
>
> >> On a desktop system I have noticed a bit of network traffic whereas
> >> users do not run any network software...
> >>
> >> How do I find out which process on the system does send/receive
> >>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:07, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Kelly:
>
>>> On a desktop system I have noticed a bit of network traffic whereas
>>> users do not run any network software...
>>>
>>> How do I find out which process on the system does send/receive
>>> network pa
thumper/~ apt-cache search shaper
shaperd - A user-mode traffic shaper for tcp-ip networks
trickle - user-space bandwidth shaper
wondershaper - Easy to use traffic shaping script
thumper/~ apt-cache search netstat
bwm-ng - small and simple console-based bandwidth monitor
gnome-nettool - network in
Thank You for Your time and answer, Kelly:
>> On a desktop system I have noticed a bit of network traffic whereas
>> users do not run any network software...
>>
>> How do I find out which process on the system does send/receive
>> network packets?
>
>Something like:
>netstat --inet -ap
>
>"--inet"
Hey found something[1]... i have still to look it up tho ;)
[1]http://www.freenet.org.nz/python/pyshaper/
greets!
aL
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 18:01 +0100, afuentes wrote:
> ive look for with no luck in the linux world something similar to net
> limiter[1]
>
> It basically tells you what program has
ive look for with no luck in the linux world something similar to net
limiter[1]
It basically tells you what program has a connection stablished in real
time and being able to limit/block uploads/downloads at program/threat
level. And as a bonus, everytime a programs connects, its added to a
list
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:43:51 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> On a desktop system I have noticed a bit of network traffic whereas
> users do not run any network software...
>
> How do I find out which process on the system does send/receive network
> packets?
"tcpdump" can also help to diagnose the net
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:43, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Good time of the day.
>
>
> On a desktop system I have noticed a bit of network traffic whereas
> users do not run any network software...
>
> How do I find out which process on the system does send/receive network
> packets?
Something like:
netst
Good time of the day.
On a desktop system I have noticed a bit of network traffic whereas
users do not run any network software...
How do I find out which process on the system does send/receive network
packets?
Thanks for Your time.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.deb
At 07:05 AM 3/11/02, Sebastiaan wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Chris Jenks wrote:
> I don't see a problem with users seeing everyone else programs. Is there
> a reason why you don't want users to use that command?
>
No, not for me, I have nothing to hide, but it is unimaginable how
paranoia so
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:05:23 +0100, Sebastiaan writes:
>
>> >As above: ps x shows only the processes for the user that gives the
>> >command (root in this case), but ps ax shows all. AFAIK there is no
>> >privacy which user runs which command.
Such is (Linux-) life. This issue was already brought
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Chris Jenks wrote:
> >As above: ps x shows only the processes for the user that gives the
> >command (root in this case), but ps ax shows all. AFAIK there is no
> >privacy which user runs which command.
> >
> >For this case you should be carefull to give passwords in com
At 06:31 AM 3/11/02, Sebastiaan wrote:
High,
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, David Richards wrote:
> hi
> is there a way of making my system only show the proccess that the user
> is running .
> so when user1 does ps aux it only shows user1 proccess?
>
Yes, just don't give th
High,
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, David Richards wrote:
> hi
> is there a way of making my system only show the proccess that the user
> is running .
> so when user1 does ps aux it only shows user1 proccess?
>
Yes, just don't give the option to show all users:
ps x or ps ux
hi
is there a way of making my system only show the proccess that the user
is running .
so when user1 does ps aux it only shows user1 proccess?
and will root be able to see all too ?
> Sure, although probably not in the way you had in mind. AFAIK there is
> currently no tool that lists open connections along with a list of
> processes that created them.
Sure it is.. try "lsof".
Additionally "netstat -tae" will ist the uid which is listening on a socket
(of course this is root
Hi,
> Is it possible to tell which proccess is using a tcp port of the box?
Sure, although probably not in the way you had in mind. AFAIK there is
currently no tool that lists open connections along with a list of
processes that created them. What you can do is use netstat to list
act
Hi,
Is it possible to tell which proccess is using a tcp port of the box?
Regards.
Paul
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
33 matches
Mail list logo
