On 01/05/12 20:02, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 05/01/12 20:26, Rick Thomas wrote:
On 12/27/11 22:04, Scott Ferguson wrote:
It "sounds" like you are running two DHCP servers - in which case you
have four options (none of which involve preseeding).
If you have multiple DHCP servers the problem is *
John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> Rick Thomas wrote:
> > Really, I'm mostly interested in figuring out what's going on and
> > probing to help get it fixed.
>
> That makes sense. In that case, I would suggest putting a protocol
> analyzer on the line and see what is happening on the wire - John
I
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 20:04 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On 01/05/12 16:30, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > Hmm . . . could you install with a manual IP address and then simply
> > change the configuration once the installation is done? - John
>
> Of course. And that's exactly what I usually wind u
On 01/05/12 16:30, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 15:55 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:40 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 12:57 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
A limited amount of redundancy is good. If one goes down, the
network
can still l
On 05/01/12 20:26, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On 12/27/11 22:04, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>
>> It "sounds" like you are running two DHCP servers - in which case you
>> have four options (none of which involve preseeding).
>>
>> If you have multiple DHCP servers the problem is *easily* fixed - please
>> tel
John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> The problem is when they are administering addresses in the same range.
> I've not configured DHCP for a long time so maybe this is common now and
> the problems have all been resolved
I believe the problem is sufficiently resolved now. Time has past and
this is defi
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 15:55 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:40 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 12:57 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >> A limited amount of redundancy is good. If one goes down, the
> >> network
> >> can still limp along.
> >>
> >> Anyway
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:02:45 +1300, Richard wrote in message
<4f060ff5.9050...@walnut.gen.nz>:
> On 06/01/12 06:57, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >
> > A limited amount of redundancy is good. If one goes down, the
> > network can still limp along.
> >
> > Anyway, that's the theory.
>
> My understandin
On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:40 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 12:57 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
A limited amount of redundancy is good. If one goes down, the
network
can still limp along.
Anyway, that's the theory.
Rick
On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I'm n
On 06/01/12 06:57, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> A limited amount of redundancy is good. If one goes down, the network
> can still limp along.
>
> Anyway, that's the theory.
My understanding is that you need to have some sort of failover setup -
so the secondary dhcp server only starts working (respon
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 12:57 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
> A limited amount of redundancy is good. If one goes down, the network
> can still limp along.
>
> Anyway, that's the theory.
>
> Rick
>
> On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> >> I'm not the OP, but I do have this problem.
A limited amount of redundancy is good. If one goes down, the network
can still limp along.
Anyway, that's the theory.
Rick
On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I'm not the OP, but I do have this problem. When I try to do an
install (wheezy) on a network with two DHCP servers,
Hi
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:26:20AM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On 12/27/11 22:04, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >
> >It "sounds" like you are running two DHCP servers - in which case you
> >have four options (none of which involve preseeding).
> >
> >If you have multiple DHCP servers the problem is *
On 12/27/11 22:04, Scott Ferguson wrote:
It "sounds" like you are running two DHCP servers - in which case you
have four options (none of which involve preseeding).
If you have multiple DHCP servers the problem is *easily* fixed - please
tell me the make and model of the primary (router/firewal
14 matches
Mail list logo
