On Friday 15 April 2011 23:49:24 Christian Jakob wrote:
> Can anyone change status of this post to SOLVED ?!
You can - just add SOLVED to the subject line!! It is usually put at the
beginning.
I have done it for you. It is no more complicated than it is to start the
thread in the first place,
>>There is only one question left:
>>Why did this happen? What could I have done, that these values changed to
>>-1?
>
>I don't know any tool that edits that file. I always edit it with (sudo -e
>/etc/apt/preferences). So, my assumption is that you made the change
>yourself, perhaps without knowing
In <1393449085.44289.1302886728608.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb037>, Christian Jakob
wrote:
>>You've pinned all your available repositories to a negative value. APT
>>refuses to install any package with a negative priority, which is why none
>>of your packages have installation candidates.
>>
>>Check /
>You've pinned all your available repositories to a negative value. APT
>refuses to install any package with a negative priority, which is why none of
>your packages have installation candidates.
>
>Check /etc/apt/preferences and /etc/apt/preferences.d/*; you've got at least
>on stanza wrong in
In <406058322.9701.1302882000282.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb034>, Christian Jakob
wrote:
>root@debian # apt-cache policy
>Package files:
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> release a=now
> -1 http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Packages
> release v=5.0,o=Debian,a=oldstable,l=Debian-Security,c=c
TO: scot..
>Um, fsck did what?
First there came a WARNING: sd2 is mounted ... blabla
Then something like this:
/dev/sda2: recovering journal
/dev/sda2: clean, ... files, ... blocks
For me this looked like fsck didn't do anything...
But, I think there is no hardwa
On 15/04/11 01:07, Christian Jakob wrote:
> fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...
Um, fsck did what?
Did it simply optimise directories - or did the file system need repairing?
Did it test the ability of the drive to retain data - find some sections
where failing and add them to t
On 14/04/11 15:46, Christian Jakob wrote:
>> Before trying to replace apt... how about trying a manual install of
>> scons and posting the output?
>
> root@debian # dpkg -i scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb
Selecting previously deselected package scons.
(Reading database ... 175 901 files and directories cur
(TOFU corrected. In general, this list prefers well-trimmed posts with
replies interleaved or underneath the quoted context. Some prefer top-
posting, but I think everyone with an opinion desires posts to be well-
trimmed.)
In <998647986.2435386.1302844626401.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb033>, Christia
root@debian # apt-get update
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release.gpg
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny Release.gpg
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny Release
Ign http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Packages/DiffIndex
I
In <1038309152.3627061.1302793651098.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb038>, Christian
Jakob wrote:
>fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...
>
>root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
>root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
>Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
>Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
>L
fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...
root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
Lese Status-Informationen ein... Fertig
Paket aptitude ist nicht verfügbar, wird aber von einem
>Before trying to replace apt... how about trying a manual install of
>scons and posting the output?
root@debian # dpkg -i scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb
Wähle vormals abgewähltes Paket scons.
(Lese Datenbank ... 175901 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.)
Entpacke scons (aus scons_1.0.0-1_
On 14/04/11 02:59, Christian Jakob wrote:
>> scott@work:~$ python -V
>> Python 2.5.2
>
> this is the same as mine...
>
> root@debian # python -V
> Python 2.5.2
You appear to have all the listed dependancies
>
>> Have you manually installed scons?
>> Did it throw up any errors?
>
> No I d
>Had you temporarily used other repositories around that time?
No, /etc/apt/sources.list~ is empty.
>The dependencies for scons are python... could it be that you have some
>non-standard python on your system??
>Occasionally I've had install problems because I'd forgotten that I'd
>temporarily ma
On 13/04/11 02:26, Christian Jakob wrote:
> Ok, first of all: Thank you for helping me!
>
>> There's the clue.
>> If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
>> install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something you don't know
>> about
>
> Yes, I can not remembe
Ok, first of all: Thank you for helping me!
>There's the clue.
>If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
>install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something you don't know
>about
Yes, I can not remember what I did wrong last time I used Debian.
Maybe it is im
On 12/04/11 15:38, Christian Jakob wrote:
> Good morning,
>
>
> No, the problem occurs since a few weeks/months and not only with this
> package...
There's the clue.
If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something y
Good morning,
>The only things I can think of are:-
>;temporary problem with the repository (it certainly works at the time
>of writing this)
>;your apt database is corrupted
>;weird dependency problem/conflicts
>
>Any non-Lenny perl on your system?
No, the problem occurs since a few weeks/month
On 12/04/11 04:48, Christian Jakob wrote:
> Hi @all,
>
>
> Normally I can handle debian problems by my own, but this time I have a
> really unusual problem with apt-get.
> I use german version of lenny on a 32 bit i386 architecture.
> Internet connection works fine and public keys are up-to-date
Hi @all,
Normally I can handle debian problems by my own, but this time I have a really
unusual problem with apt-get.
I use german version of lenny on a 32 bit i386 architecture.
Internet connection works fine and public keys are up-to-date (see below).
I think the following lines will help you
21 matches
Mail list logo
